An approach to capturing and reusing tacit design knowledge using relational learning for knowledge graphs

2022 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. 101505
Author(s):  
Jia Jia ◽  
Yingzhong Zhang ◽  
Mohamed Saad
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenhan Xiong ◽  
Mo Yu ◽  
Shiyu Chang ◽  
Xiaoxiao Guo ◽  
William Yang Wang

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyang Chen ◽  
Wen Zhang ◽  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Qiang Chen ◽  
Huajun Chen

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (05) ◽  
pp. 8673-8680
Author(s):  
Pengda Qin ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Wenhu Chen ◽  
Chunyun Zhang ◽  
Weiran Xu ◽  
...  

Large-scale knowledge graphs (KGs) are shown to become more important in current information systems. To expand the coverage of KGs, previous studies on knowledge graph completion need to collect adequate training instances for newly-added relations. In this paper, we consider a novel formulation, zero-shot learning, to free this cumbersome curation. For newly-added relations, we attempt to learn their semantic features from their text descriptions and hence recognize the facts of unseen relations with no examples being seen. For this purpose, we leverage Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) to establish the connection between text and knowledge graph domain: The generator learns to generate the reasonable relation embeddings merely with noisy text descriptions. Under this setting, zero-shot learning is naturally converted to a traditional supervised classification task. Empirically, our method is model-agnostic that could be potentially applied to any version of KG embeddings, and consistently yields performance improvements on NELL and Wiki dataset.


Author(s):  
Sebastijan Dumancic ◽  
Alberto Garcia-Duran ◽  
Mathias Niepert

Many real-world domains can be expressed as graphs and, more generally, as multi-relational knowledge graphs. Though reasoning and learning with knowledge graphs has traditionally been addressed by symbolic approaches such as Statistical relational learning, recent methods in (deep) representation learning have shown promising results for specialised tasks such as knowledge base completion. These approaches, also known as distributional, abandon the traditional symbolic paradigm by replacing symbols with vectors in Euclidean space. With few exceptions, symbolic and distributional approaches are explored in different communities and little is known about their respective strengths and weaknesses. In this work, we compare distributional and symbolic relational learning approaches on various standard relational classification and knowledge base completion tasks. Furthermore, we analyse the properties of the datasets and relate them to the performance of the methods in the comparison. The results reveal possible indicators that could help in choosing one approach over the other for particular knowledge graphs.


Author(s):  
Hai Dang Tran ◽  
Daria Stepanova ◽  
Mohamed H. Gad-Elrab ◽  
Francesca A. Lisi ◽  
Gerhard Weikum

Author(s):  
Honghai LI ◽  
Jun CAI

The transformation of China's design innovation industry has highlighted the importance of design research. The design research process in practice can be regarded as the process of knowledge production. The design 3.0 mode based on knowledge production MODE2 has been shown in the Chinese design innovation industry. On this cognition, this paper establishes a map with two dimensions of how knowledge integration occurs in practice based design research, which are the design knowledge transfer and contextual transformation of design knowledge. We use this map to carry out the analysis of design research cases. Through the analysis, we define four typical practice based design research models from the viewpoint of knowledge integration. This method and the proposed model can provide a theoretical basis and a path for better management design research projects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document