Asymmetric responses of soil respiration in three temperate steppes along a precipitation gradient in northern China revealed by soil-monolith transplanting experiment

2020 ◽  
Vol 294 ◽  
pp. 108126
Author(s):  
Ying Li ◽  
Zhenxing Zhou ◽  
Lingjie Lei ◽  
Jingyi Ru ◽  
Jian Song ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 420 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 105-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Li Yu ◽  
Dafeng Hui ◽  
Qi Deng ◽  
E. Kudjo Dzantor ◽  
Philip A. Fay ◽  
...  

Geoderma ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 364 ◽  
pp. 114200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Zhang ◽  
Zhaoliang Song ◽  
Qian Hao ◽  
Changxun Yu ◽  
Hongyan Liu ◽  
...  

Geoderma ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 329 ◽  
pp. 20-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunlong He ◽  
Yuchun Qi ◽  
Yunshe Dong ◽  
Qin Peng ◽  
Shufang Guo ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (18) ◽  
Author(s):  
阚雨晨 KAN Yuchen ◽  
武瑞鑫 WU Ruixin ◽  
钟梦莹 ZHONG Mengying ◽  
王建勋 WANG Jianxun ◽  
蒲小鹏 PU Xiaopeng ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyang Hou ◽  
Zhen Wang ◽  
Schellenberg P. Michael ◽  
Lei Ji ◽  
Xiangjun Yun

Soil respiration is a major process for organic carbon losses from arid ecosystems. A field experiment was conducted in 2010 and 2012 on the responses to continuous grazing, rotational grazing and no grazing on desert steppe vegetation in northern China. The growing season in 2010 was relatively dry and in 2012 was relatively wet. The results showed that mean soil respiration was the highest with no grazing in both growing seasons. Compared with no grazing, the soil respiration was decreased by 23.0% under continuous grazing and 14.1% under seasonal rotational grazing. Soil respiration increased linearly with increasing soil water gravimetric content, aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP), belowground net primary productivity (BNPP) and soil carbon and nitrogen contents across the 2 years, whereas a negative correlation was detected between soil respiration and soil temperature. A significant decrease in soil respiration was observed under both continuous grazing and in seasonal rotational grazing in the dry growing season, but no significant difference was detected in the wet growing season. In the wet year, only a non-significant difference in soil respiration was observed between different grazing types. Patterns of seasonal precipitation strongly affected the temporal changes of soil respiration as well as its response to different grazing types. The findings highlight the importance of differences in abiotic (soil temperature, soil water gravimetric content and soil carbon and nitrogen contents) and biotic (ANPP, BNPP and litter mass) factors in mediating the responses of soil respiration to the different grazing regimes.


BioResources ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 9303-9323
Author(s):  
Zhihui Wang ◽  
Dawei Yin ◽  
Hongyi Wang ◽  
Changjiang Zhao ◽  
Zuotong Li

Saline-alkali soils of northern China are prone to waterlogging after degradation caused by overuse. The effects of biochar (40 t/ha) were tested relative to the physico-chemical properties of maize rhizosphere soil, the composition and function of the soil bacterial community, and its response to sudden waterlogging. Biochar treatment decreased the pH and bulk density of the soil and increased soil organic carbon (SOC), available nitrogen (AN), and available phosphorus (AP). The relative abundance of bacteria (Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Nitrospirae) also increased, along with the activities of soil enzymes, such as dehydrogenase, β-glucosidase, and alkaline phosphomonoester. The response of soil microbial enzymes to biochar addition was induced by changes in the soil physical properties (pH, soil moisture content, and soil respiration (BR)). Changes in the bacterial community structure were driven by soil nutrients and physical characteristics (AN, AP, SOC, pH, moisture, water-stable aggregate stability rate, BR, and bulk density). After waterlogging, soil with biochar demonstrated high water permeability and improved soil respiration. The relative abundance of soil bacteria and enzyme activities remained higher in the biochar plot than in the no-biochar plot. Biochar maintained the growth and vitality of maize roots in unfavorable environmental conditions, thus ensuring high yields.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document