Red cell distribution width is a predictor of mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 989-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sevket Balta ◽  
Sait Demirkol ◽  
Mustafa Hatipoglu, ◽  
Sukru Ardic ◽  
Zekeriya Arslan ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 545-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
You Hwan Jo ◽  
Kyuseok Kim ◽  
Jae Hyuk Lee ◽  
Changwoo Kang ◽  
Taegyun Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajan Ghimire ◽  
Yogendra Man Shakya ◽  
Tirtha Man Shrestha ◽  
Ram Prasad Neupane

Abstract Background: Sepsis is a common problem encountered in the emergency room which needs to be intervened early. Predicting prognosis is always a difficult task in busy emergency rooms using present scores, which has several variables to calculate. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is an easy, cheap, and efficacious score to predict the severity and mortality of patients with sepsis.Methods: This prospective analytical study was conducted in the emergency room of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital among the patients age ≥16 years and with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis using qSOFA score. 148 patients were analyzed in the study by using a non-probability purposive sampling method. Results: RDW has fair efficacy to predict the mortality in sepsis (Area under the Curve of 0.734; 95% C. I= 0.649-0.818; p-value=0.000) as APACHE II (AUC of 0.728; 95% C. I= 0.637 to 0.819; p-value=0.000) or SOFA (AUC of 0.680, 95% C.I =0.591-0.770; p-value=0.001). Youden Index was maximum (37%) at RDW value 14.75, which has a sensitivity of 83% (positive likelihood ratio=1.81) and specificity of 54% (negative likelihood ratio=0.32). Out of 44 patients with septic shock 16 died (36.4 %) and among 104 patients without septic shock, 24 died (22.9%) which had the odds ratio of 0.713 (p=0.555, 95% C. I= 0.231-2.194). Overall mortality was 27.02% (n=40). RDW group analysis showed no mortality in RDW <13.1 group, 3.6% mortality in 13.1 to 14 RDW group, 22.0% mortality in 14 to >15.6 RDW group and 45.9% mortality in >15.6 RDW group. Significant mortality difference was seen in 14 to >15.6 and >15.6 RDW subgroups with a p-value of 0.003 and 0.008 respectively.Conclusion: Area under the curve value for RDW is fair enough to predict the mortality of patients with sepsis in the emergency room. It can be integrated with other severity scores (APACHE II or SOFA score) for better prediction of prognosis of septic patients.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajan Ghimire ◽  
Yogendra Man Shakya ◽  
Tirtha Man Shrestha ◽  
Ram Prasad Neupane

Abstract Background Sepsis is common problem encountered in emergency room which needs to be intervened early. Predicting prognosis is always a difficult task in busy emergency room using present scores which has numbers of variables to calculate. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is easy, cheap and efficacious score to predict severity and mortality of patients with sepsis. Method This prospective analytical study was conducted in emergency room of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital among patients of age ≥16 years with clinical diagnosis of sepsis using qSOFA score. 148 patients were analyzed in study by using nonprobability purposive sampling method. Result RDW is more efficacious test to predict mortality in sepsis (Area under the Curve of 0.734; 95% C. I= 0.649-0.818) than APACHE II (AUC of 0.728; 95% C. I= 0.637 to 0.819) or SOFA (AUC of 0.680, 95% C.I =0.591-0.770). Cutoff of RDW 15.05 has sensitivity of 73% (positive likelihood ratio 1.82) and specificity of 60% (negative likelihood ratio 0.45) while cutoff of RDW 16.1 has Sensitivity of 56% (PLR 2.07) and specificity of 73% (NLR 0.6). Out of 44 patients with septic shock 16 died (36.4%) and among 104 patients without septic shock,24 died (22.9%) with odds ratio of 0.713 (p=0.555, 95% C. I= 0.231-2.194). Overall mortality was 27.02% (n=40). RDW subgroup analysis showed no mortality in low RDW (<13.1) subgroup, 3.6% mortality in moderate (13.1 to 14) RDW group, 22.0% mortality in high (14 to >15.6) RDW group and 45.9% mortality in very high (>15.6) RDW group. Significant mortality difference seen in high and very high RDW subgroup with p value 0.003 and 0.008 respectively. Conclusion RDW is more efficacious test to predict mortality in sepsis than APACHE II or SOFA. Cutoff of RDW 15.05 has sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 60%. So RDW can be used as a good prognostic score to predict severity and mortality of patients with sepsis in emergency room.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajan Ghimire ◽  
Yogendra Man Shakya ◽  
Tirtha Man Shrestha ◽  
Ram Prasad Neupane

Abstract Background: Sepsis is a common problem encountered in the emergency room which needs to be intervened early. Predicting prognosis is always a difficult task in busy emergency rooms using present scores, which has several variables to calculate. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is an easy, cheap, and efficacious score to predict the severity and mortality of patients with sepsis.Methods: This prospective analytical study was conducted in the emergency room of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital among the patients age ≥16 years and with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis using qSOFA score. 148 patients were analyzed in the study by using a non-probability purposive sampling method. Results: RDW has fair efficacy to predict the mortality in sepsis (Area under the Curve of 0.734; 95% C. I= 0.649-0.818; p-value=0.000) as APACHE II (AUC of 0.728; 95% C. I= 0.637 to 0.819; p-value=0.000) or SOFA (AUC of 0.680, 95% C.I =0.591-0.770; p-value=0.001). Youden Index was maximum (37%) at RDW value 14.75, which has a sensitivity of 83% (positive likelihood ratio=1.81) and specificity of 54% (negative likelihood ratio=0.32). Out of 44 patients with septic shock 16 died (36.4 %) and among 104 patients without septic shock, 24 died (22.9%) which had the odds ratio of 0.713 (p=0.555, 95% C. I= 0.231-2.194). Overall mortality was 27.02% (n=40). RDW group analysis showed no mortality in RDW <13.1 group, 3.6% mortality in 13.1 to 14 RDW group, 22.0% mortality in 14 to >15.6 RDW group and 45.9% mortality in >15.6 RDW group. Significant mortality difference was seen in 14 to >15.6 and >15.6 RDW subgroups with a p-value of 0.003 and 0.008 respectively.Conclusion: Area under the curve value for RDW is fair enough to predict the mortality of patients with sepsis in the emergency room. It can be integrated with other severity scores (APACHE II or SOFA score) for better prediction of prognosis of septic patients.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajan Ghimire ◽  
Yogendra Man Shakya ◽  
Tirtha Man Shrestha ◽  
Ram Prasad Neupane

Abstract Background: Sepsis is a common problem encountered in the emergency room which needs to be intervened early. Predicting prognosis is always a difficult task in busy emergency rooms using present scores, which has several variables to calculate. Red cell distribution width (RDW) is an easy, cheap, and efficacious score to predict the severity and mortality of patients with sepsis. Methods: This prospective analytical study was conducted in the emergency room of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital among the patients age ≥16 years and with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis using qSOFA score. 148 patients were analyzed in the study by using a non-probability purposive sampling method. Results: RDW has fair efficacy to predict the mortality in sepsis (Area under the Curve of 0.734; 95% C. I= 0.649-0.818; p-value=0.000) as APACHE II (AUC of 0.728; 95% C. I= 0.637 to 0.819; p-value=0.000) or SOFA (AUC of 0.680, 95% C.I =0.591-0.770; p-value=0.001). Youden Index was maximum (37%) at RDW value 14.75, which has a sensitivity of 83% (positive likelihood ratio=1.81) and specificity of 54% (negative likelihood ratio=0.32). Out of 44 patients with septic shock 16 died (36.4 %) and among 104 patients without septic shock, 24 died (22.9%) which had the odds ratio of 0.713 (p=0.555, 95% C. I= 0.231-2.194). Overall mortality was 27.02% (n=40). RDW group analysis showed no mortality in RDW <13.1 group, 3.6% mortality in 13.1 to 14 RDW group, 22.0% mortality in 14 to >15.6 RDW group and 45.9% mortality in >15.6 RDW group. Significant mortality difference was seen in 14 to >15.6 and >15.6 RDW subgroups with a p-value of 0.003 and 0.008 respectively. Conclusion: Area under the curve value for RDW is fair enough to use it as a good prognostic score to predict the mortality of patients with sepsis in the emergency room. Keywords: red cell distribution width, sepsis, emergency care, mortality


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document