scholarly journals A Genome-wide Study Reveals Copy Number Variants Exclusive to Childhood Obesity Cases

2010 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 661-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph T. Glessner ◽  
Jonathan P. Bradfield ◽  
Kai Wang ◽  
Nagahide Takahashi ◽  
Haitao Zhang ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 816-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jade Chapman ◽  
Elliott Rees ◽  
Denise Harold ◽  
Dobril Ivanov ◽  
Amy Gerrish ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa-Marie Niestroj ◽  
Daniel P. Howrigan ◽  
Eduardo Perez-Palma ◽  
Elmo Saarentaus ◽  
Peter Nürnberg ◽  
...  

AbstractRare and large copy number variants (CNVs) around known genomic ‘hotspots’ are strongly implicated in epilepsy etiology. But it remains unclear whether the observed associations are specific to an epilepsy phenotype, and if additional risk signal can be found outside hotspots. Here, we present the largest CNV burden and first CNV breakpoint level association analysis in epilepsy to date with 11,246 European epilepsy cases and 7,318 ancestry-matched controls. We studied five epilepsy phenotypes: genetic generalized epilepsy, lesional focal epilepsy, non-acquired focal epilepsy, epileptic encephalopathy, and unclassified epilepsy. We discovered novel epilepsy-associated CNV loci and further characterized the CNV burden enrichment among phenotype-specific epilepsies. Finally, we provide evidence for deletion burden outside of known hotspot regions and show that CNVs play a significant role in the genetic architecture of lesional focal epilepsies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian R Marshall ◽  
◽  
Daniel P Howrigan ◽  
Daniele Merico ◽  
Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Angela J. Rogers ◽  
Jen-Hwa Chu ◽  
Katayoon Darvishi ◽  
Iuliana Ionita-Laza ◽  
Barbara J. Klanderman ◽  
...  

Brain ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 143 (7) ◽  
pp. 2106-2118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa-Marie Niestroj ◽  
Eduardo Perez-Palma ◽  
Daniel P Howrigan ◽  
Yadi Zhou ◽  
Feixiong Cheng ◽  
...  

Abstract Cytogenic testing is routinely applied in most neurological centres for severe paediatric epilepsies. However, which characteristics of copy number variants (CNVs) confer most epilepsy risk and which epilepsy subtypes carry the most CNV burden, have not been explored on a genome-wide scale. Here, we present the largest CNV investigation in epilepsy to date with 10 712 European epilepsy cases and 6746 ancestry-matched controls. Patients with genetic generalized epilepsy, lesional focal epilepsy, non-acquired focal epilepsy, and developmental and epileptic encephalopathy were included. All samples were processed with the same technology and analysis pipeline. All investigated epilepsy types, including lesional focal epilepsy patients, showed an increase in CNV burden in at least one tested category compared to controls. However, we observed striking differences in CNV burden across epilepsy types and investigated CNV categories. Genetic generalized epilepsy patients have the highest CNV burden in all categories tested, followed by developmental and epileptic encephalopathy patients. Both epilepsy types also show association for deletions covering genes intolerant for truncating variants. Genome-wide CNV breakpoint association showed not only significant loci for genetic generalized and developmental and epileptic encephalopathy patients but also for lesional focal epilepsy patients. With a 34-fold risk for developing genetic generalized epilepsy, we show for the first time that the established epilepsy-associated 15q13.3 deletion represents the strongest risk CNV for genetic generalized epilepsy across the whole genome. Using the human interactome, we examined the largest connected component of the genes overlapped by CNVs in the four epilepsy types. We observed that genetic generalized epilepsy and non-acquired focal epilepsy formed disease modules. In summary, we show that in all common epilepsy types, 1.5–3% of patients carry epilepsy-associated CNVs. The characteristics of risk CNVs vary tremendously across and within epilepsy types. Thus, we advocate genome-wide genomic testing to identify all disease-associated types of CNVs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 191 ◽  
pp. 153-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.T.M.M. Prinsen ◽  
M.G. Strillacci ◽  
F. Schiavini ◽  
E. Santus ◽  
A. Rossoni ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Erica Soster ◽  
Theresa Boomer ◽  
Susan Hicks ◽  
Samantha Caldwell ◽  
Brittany Dyr ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Pregnant women have unprecedented choices for prenatal screening and testing. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers the option to screen for aneuploidy of all chromosomes and genome-wide copy-number variants (CNVs), expanding screening beyond the common trisomies (“traditional” cfDNA). We sought to review the utilization trends and clinical performance characteristics of a commercially available genome-wide cfDNA test, with a subset having available diagnostic testing outcomes. Methods Retrospective analysis of 55,517 samples submitted for genome-wide cfDNA screening at a commercial laboratory, assessing indications, demographics, results, and performance. The cohort was broken into three “testing years”’ to compare trends. Results Indications shifted over time, with a decrease in referrals for ultrasound findings (22.0% to 12.0%) and an increase in no known high-risk indication (3.0% to 16.6%). Of the positive results, 25% would be missed with traditional cfDNA screening. High sensitivity and specificity were observed with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 72.6% for genome-wide CNVs and 22.4% for rare autosomal trisomies (RATs). Conclusion A broader patient population is utilizing genome-wide cfDNA, yet positivity rates and the contribution of genome-wide events have remained stable at approximately 5% and 25%, respectively. Test performance in a real-world clinical population shows high PPVs in those CNVs tested, with diagnostic outcomes in over 40% of positive cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document