Effect of National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Definition Changes on Colon Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Rates

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. S12
Author(s):  
Jeanne A. Yegge ◽  
Kathleen Gase ◽  
Melinda Hohrein ◽  
Raya Khoury ◽  
Hilary Babcock
2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 907-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Olsen ◽  
Katelin B. Nickel ◽  
Ida K. Fox ◽  
Julie A. Margenthaler ◽  
Kelly E. Ball ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVEThe National Healthcare Safety Network classifies breast operations as clean procedures with an expected 1%–2% surgical site infection (SSI) incidence. We assessed differences in SSI incidence following mastectomy with and without immediate reconstruction in a large, geographically diverse population.DESIGNRetrospective cohort studyPATIENTSCommercially insured women aged 18–64 years with ICD-9-CM procedure or CPT-4 codes for mastectomy from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2011METHODSIncident SSIs within 180 days after surgery were identified by ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. The incidences of SSI after mastectomy with and without immediate reconstruction were compared using the χ2 test.RESULTSFrom 2004 to 2011, 18,696 mastectomy procedures among 18,085 women were identified, with immediate reconstruction in 10,836 procedures (58%). The incidence of SSI within 180 days following mastectomy with or without reconstruction was 8.1% (1,520 of 18,696). In total, 49% of SSIs were identified within 30 days post-mastectomy, 24.5% were identified 31–60 days post-mastectomy, 10.5% were identified 61–90 days post-mastectomy, and 15.7% were identified 91–180 days post-mastectomy. The incidences of SSI were 5.0% (395 of 7,860) after mastectomy only, 10.3% (848 of 8,217) after mastectomy plus implant, 10.7% (207 of 1,942) after mastectomy plus flap, and 10.3% (70 of 677) after mastectomy plus flap and implant (P<.001). The SSI risk was higher after bilateral compared with unilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (11.4% vs 9.4%, P=.001) than without (6.1% vs 4.7%, P=.021) immediate reconstruction.CONCLUSIONSSSI incidence was twice that after mastectomy with immediate reconstruction than after mastectomy alone. Only 49% of SSIs were coded within 30 days after operation. Our results suggest that stratification by procedure type facilitates comparison of SSI rates after breast operations between facilities.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;36(8):907–914


Author(s):  
Antoinette A. A. Bediako-Bowan ◽  
David K. Warren ◽  
Katelin B. Nickel ◽  
Victoria J. Fraser ◽  
Margaret A. Olsen

Abstract More than 50% of women with clinically apparent infection after mastectomy did not meet the 2020 National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definition for surgical site infection (SSI). Implant loss was similar whether the 2020 NHSN SSI definition was met or not, suggesting equivalent adverse outcomes regardless of restriction to the surveillance definition.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chanu Rhee ◽  
Rui Wang ◽  
Maximilian S. Jentzsch ◽  
Carly Broadwell ◽  
Heather Hsu ◽  
...  

AbstractNational policies target healthcare-associated infections using medical claims and National Healthcare Safety Network surveillance data. We found low concordance between the 2 data sources in rates and rankings for surgical site infection following colon surgery in 155 hospitals, underscoring the limitations in evaluating hospital quality by claims data.


2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 970-986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Mu ◽  
Jonathan R. Edwards ◽  
Teresa C. Horan ◽  
Sandra I. Berrios-Torres ◽  
Scott K. Fridkin

Background.The National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) has provided simple risk adjustment of surgical site infection (SSI) rates to participating hospitals to facilitate quality improvement activities; improved risk models were developed and evaluated.Methods.Data reported to the NHSN for all operative procedures performed from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2008, were analyzed. Only SSIs related to the primary incision site were included. A common set of patient- and hospital-specific variables were evaluated as potential SSI risk factors by univariate analysis. Some ific variables were available for inclusion. Stepwise logistic regression was used to develop the specific risk models by procedure category. Bootstrap resampling was used to validate the models, and the c-index was used to compare the predictive power of new procedure-specific risk models with that of the models with the NHSN risk index as the only variable (NHSN risk index model).Results.From January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2008, 847 hospitals in 43 states reported a total of 849,659 procedures and 16,147 primary incisional SSIs (risk, 1.90%) among 39 operative procedure categories. Overall, the median c-index of the new procedure-specific risk was greater (0.67 [range, 0.59–0.85]) than the median c-index of the NHSN risk index models (0.60 [range, 0.51–0.77]); for 33 of 39 procedures, the new procedure-specific models yielded a higher c-index than did the NHSN risk index models.Conclusions.A set of new risk models developed using existing data elements collected through the NHSN improves predictive performance, compared with the traditional NHSN risk index stratification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document