Does the presence of oral care guidelines affect oral care delivery by intensive care unit nurses? A survey of Saudi intensive care unit nurses

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 921-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed K. Alotaibi ◽  
Mohammed Alshayiqi ◽  
Sundar Ramalingam
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista Wolcott Altaker ◽  
Jill Howie-Esquivel ◽  
Janine K. Cataldo

Background Intensive care unit nurses experience moral distress when they feel unable to deliver ethically appropriate care to patients. Moral distress is associated with nurse burnout and patient care avoidance. Objectives To evaluate relationships among moral distress, empowerment, ethical climate, and access to palliative care in the intensive care unit. Methods Intensive care unit nurses in a national database were recruited to complete an online survey based on the Moral Distress Scale–Revised, Psychological Empowerment Index, Hospital Ethical Climate Survey, and a palliative care delivery questionnaire. Descriptive, correlational, and regression analyses were performed. Results Of 288 initiated surveys, 238 were completed. Participants were nationally representative of nurses by age, years of experience, and geographical region. Most were white and female and had a bachelor’s degree. The mean moral distress score was moderately high, and correlations were found with empowerment (r = −0.145; P = .02) and ethical climate scores (r = −0.354; P < .001). Relationships between moral distress and empowerment scores and between moral distress and ethical climate scores were not affected by access to palliative care. Nurses reporting palliative care access had higher moral distress scores than those without such access. Education, ethnicity, unit size, access to full palliative care team, and ethical climate explained variance in moral distress scores. Conclusions Poor ethical climate, unintegrated palliative care teams, and nurse empowerment are associated with increased moral distress. The findings highlight the need to promote palliative care education and palliative care teams that are well integrated into intensive care units.


2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Karen-leigh Edward ◽  
Alessandra Galletti ◽  
Minh Huynh

Background Nurses in the intensive care unit are central to clinical care delivery and are often the staff members most accessible to family members for communication. Family members’ ratings of satisfaction with the intensive care unit admission are affected more by communication quality than by the level of care for the patient. Family members may feel that communication in the intensive care unit is inconsistent. Objectives To use a shared decision-making model to deliver a communication education program for intensive care unit nurses, evaluate the confidence levels of nurses who undertook the education, and examine changes in family members’ satisfaction with communication from intensive care unit nurses after the nurses received the education. Methods A mixed-methods design was used. Seventeen nurses and 81 family members participated. Results Staff members were overall very confident with communicating with family members of critically ill patients. This finding was likely linked to staff members’ experience in the position, with 88% of nurses having more than 11 years’ experience. Family members were happy with care but dissatisfied with the environment. Conclusions Environmental factors can negatively affect communication with family members in the intensive care unit.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-139
Author(s):  
Kathy M. Baker ◽  
Natalia Sullivan Vragovic ◽  
Robert B. Banzett

Background Dyspnea (breathing discomfort) is commonly experienced by critically ill patients and at this time is not routinely assessed and documented. Intensive care unit nurses at the study institution recently instituted routine assessment and documentation of dyspnea in all patients able to report using a numeric scale ranging from 0 to 10. Objective To assess nurses’ perceptions of the utility of routine dyspnea measurement, patients’ comprehension of assessment questions, and the impact on nursing practice and to gather nurses’ suggestions for improvement. Methods Data were obtained from interviews with intensive care unit nurses in small focus groups and an anonymous online survey randomly distributed to nurses representing all intensive care units. Results Intensive care unit nurses affirmed the importance of routine dyspnea assessment and documentation. Before implementing the measurement tool, nurses often assessed for breathing discomfort in patients by using observed signs. Most nurses agreed that routine assessment can be used to predict patients’ outcomes and improve patient-centered care. Nurses found the assessment tool easy to use and reported that it did not interfere with workflow. Nurses felt that patients were able to provide meaningful ratings of dyspnea, similar to ratings of pain, and often used patients’ ratings in conjunction with observed physical signs to optimize patient care. Conclusion Our study shows that nurses understand the importance of routine dyspnea assessment and that the addition of a simple patient report scale can improve care delivery and does not add to the burden of work-flow.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norkhafizah Saddki ◽  
Farah Elani Mohamad Sani ◽  
Mon Mon Tin-Oo

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 355-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Freda DeKeyser Ganz ◽  
Raanan Ofra ◽  
Rabia Khalaila ◽  
Hadassa Levy ◽  
Dana Arad ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document