Treatment of a Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the combination of a myofunctional trainer and fixed appliances

2019 ◽  
Vol 156 (4) ◽  
pp. 545-554
Author(s):  
Xiaowei Li ◽  
Hongmei Wang ◽  
Song Li ◽  
Yuxing Bai
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

scholarly journals Class II, Division 1 Angle malocclusion with severe proclination of maxillary incisors

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kátia Montanha
Keyword(s):  
Female Patient ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Adolescent Female ◽  
Common Complaint ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Maxillary Incisors ◽  
Dentofacial Orthopedics ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Protrusion of maxillary incisors is a common complaint among patients seeking orthodontic treatment. This report addresses the correction of Class II Angle malocclusion with excessively bucally proclined maxillary incisors, in an adolescent female patient, through the use of extraoral and fixed appliances. This case was presented to the Brazilian Board of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (BBO) as part of the requirements for obtaining the title of certified by the BBO.

First Premolar Extractions and Fixed Appliances in the Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel E. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Lower Face ◽  
Face Height ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Facial Pattern ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Cephalometric Study ◽  
Main Effects ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

This cephalometric study investigates the changes in the facial skeleton and dento-alveolar structures which occur during orthodontic treatment of the Class II Division 1 malocclusion by extraction of four first premolars followed by fixed appliances. The Begg and edgewise appliances are compared, and both are contrasted with a group of untreated Class II Division 1 subjects. The main effects of treatment were in the dento-alveolar structures, the changes in the overall facial pattern being small and largely due to extrusion of the molars during overbite reduction. Molar extrusion tended to interrupt forward growth rotation of the mandible, temporarily making it more backwards in direction, and increasing the lower anterior face height. An increase in the posterior lower face height was also noted in the edgewise group. Whilst SNA, and therefore ANB, reduced significantly during treatment, this was probably the result of palatal root torque to the upper incisors. The Begg appliance was more successful than edgewise in this respect.

scholarly journals Orthodontic management of a young girl with Class II div-1 malocclusion with spacing of upper anterior segment: A case report

2016 ◽  
pp. 42-47
Author(s):  
Kohinur Akther ◽  
Md Zakir Hossain
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Anterior Segment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Young Girl ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Leveling And Alignment ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

We describe the treatment of a young girl age, 24 years, with class II division 1 malocclusion and spacing of upper anterior segment. Treatment consisted mainly of space closing, arch contraction, leveling and alignment with Edgewise fixed appliances by multiloop technique.  Due to patient good cooperation, treatment time reduced (10 months). The treatment resulted in proper alignment of upper & lower anterior segment, an ideal overjet, overbite and incisor angulations. Ban J Orthod & Dentofac Orthop, April 2016; Vol-6 (1-2), P.42-47

scholarly journals Contemporary treatment of a Class II division 1 case

1970 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-65
Author(s):  
MK Alam
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Lower Arch ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

A 17 year-old Bangladeshi female presented with a severe Class II division 1 incisor relationship on a mild Skeletal II base. Crowding was moderate in the upper arch. The lower arch was well aligned. Treatment was commenced using fixed appliances and followed by extractions of upper first premolars. This case illustrates the versatility of the fixed appliances in the treatment of those cases exhibiting Class II division 1 malocclusion with crowding. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v11i1.9827 BJMS 2012; 11(1): 63-65

Long-term occlusal and soft-tissue profile outcomes after treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with fixed appliances

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 362-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niall J.P. McGuinness ◽  
Donald J. Burden ◽  
Orlagh T. Hunt ◽  
Chris D. Johnston ◽  
Mike Stevenson
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

scholarly journals Cephalometric changes in Class II division 1 patients treated with two maxillary premolars extraction

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 61-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisana Piano Seben ◽  
Fabricio Pinelli Valarelli ◽  
Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas ◽  
Rodrigo Hermont Cançado ◽  
Aristeu Correa Bittencourt Neto
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Upper Lip ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Maxillary Premolars ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Cephalometric Changes ◽  
Tissue Alterations ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cephalometric alterations in patients with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion, orthodontically treated with extraction of two maxillary premolars. METHODS: The sample comprised 68 initial and final lateral cephalograms of 34 patients of both gender (mean initial age of 14.03 years and mean final age of 17.25 years), treated with full fixed appliances and extraction of the first maxillary premolars. In order to evaluate the alterations due the treatment between initial and final phases, the dependent t test was applied to the studied cephalometric variables. RESULTS: The dentoskeletal alterations due to extraction of two maxillary premolars in the Class II division 1 malocclusion were: maxillary retrusion, improvement of the maxillomandibular relation, increase of lower anterior face height, retrusion of the maxillary incisors, buccal inclination, protrusion and extrusion of the mandibular incisors, besides the reduction of overjet and overbite. The tissue alterations showed decrease of the facial convexity and retrusion of the upper lip. CONCLUSIONS: The extraction of two maxillary premolars in Class II division 1 malocclusion promotes dentoskeletal and tissue alterations that contribute to an improvement of the relation between the bone bases and the soft tissue profile.

scholarly journals Influence of fixed appliances on two-phase orthopedic-orthodontic treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. e18922
Author(s):  
Leniana Santos Neves ◽  
Luiz Filiphe Gonçalves Canuto ◽  
Rodrigo Hermont Cançado ◽  
Guilherme Janson ◽  
Alexandre Fortes Drummond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Maxillary Incisor ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Fixed Appliances ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Aim: The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the effects of phase 2 with fixed appliances, after phase 1 Bionator treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion, as compared to a matching control group. Methods: The experimental group consisted of 20 patients who were evaluated after orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances subsequently to functional therapy with the Bionator in phase 1.  A control group consisting of 20 Class II, division 1 individuals. Results: During phase 1 there was significant forward growth restriction in the maxillary complex, improvement of the maxillomandibular relationship and decrease in facial convexity.  There was also significant reduction of the maxillary incisor proclination and protrusion, protrusion of the mandibular incisors, and vertical development of the mandibular molars.  The overjet was significantly reduced and the molar relationship was significantly improved.  Treatment during phase 2, with fixed appliances, resulted in significant maxillary forward growth restriction and facial convexity reduction. Conclusion:  Major Class II skeletal and dentoalveolar anteroposterior correction was obtained during phase 1, with the Bionator.  Phase 2, with fixed appliances only produced a significant maxillary forward growth restriction and facial convexity reduction, without any significant dentoalveolar change.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document