scholarly journals Femur-sparing pattern of abnormal fetal growth in pregnant women from New York City after maternal Zika virus infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 219 (2) ◽  
pp. 187.e1-187.e20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christie L. Walker ◽  
Audrey A. Merriam ◽  
Eric O. Ohuma ◽  
Manjiri K. Dighe ◽  
Michael Gale ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (2) ◽  
pp. 487-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin E. Conners ◽  
Ellen H. Lee ◽  
Corinne N. Thompson ◽  
Emily McGibbon ◽  
Jennifer L. Rakeman ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Valkova

ObjectiveDemonstrate the value of consolidated claims data from communityhealthcare providers in Zika Virus Disease surveillance at local level.IntroductionZika virus disease and Zika virus congenital infection arenationally notifiable conditions that became prominent recently as agrowing number of travel-associated infections have been identifiedin the United States. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) have dedicated significant time and effort on determining andaddressing the risks and impact of Zika on pregnant women and theirbabies who are most vulnerable to the disease. CDC relies on twosources of information, reported voluntarily by healthcare providers,to monitor Zika virus disease: ArboNET and the newly establishedU.S. Zika Pregnancy Registry. A study by IMS Health compared U.S.trends of the Zika virus disease in general and pregnant women withZika virus disease in particular observed in an IMS healthcare claimsdatabase and the CDC ArboNET and the newly established U.S. ZikaPregnancy Registry.MethodsIMS used for this analysis claims for reimbursement from office-based healthcare providers, which are widely accepted standardbusiness practice records throughout the healthcare industry. IMSclaims data is collected daily from office-based providers throughoutthe U.S. and processed, stored and analyzed in a centralized database.The information is available at the patient and visit level, with theability to characterize deidentified patients by age, gender andZIP3 location and to trace a patient’s history of visits, diagnoses,procedures, drugs prescribed and tests performed or ordered.The general IMS study sample captured all patients throughout thecontinental United States covered in claims between October 1, 2016and May 24, 2016 with ICD 10 diagnosis code A92.8, Other SpecifiedMosquito-Borne Viral Fevers. This sample was compared to thesample of laboratory-confirmed Zika virus disease cases reportedto ArboNET by state or territory from the CDC Arboviral DiseaseBranch from January 1, 2015 through May 18, 2016. In addition,IMS compared the subset of patients with both a Zika virus diseasediagnosis and any ICD 10 pregnancy diagnosis to the CDC sampleof patients captured by the U.S. Zika Pregnancy Registry with anylaboratory evidence of possible Zika virus infection in the UnitedStates and territories.ResultsThroughout the continental United States, the IMS claims-basedsample captured 875 patients with a Zika virus disease diagnosiscompared to 548 travel-associated cases reported by CDC. At thestate level, especially in New York, New Jersey, Illinois and Texas,the IMS data captured a much larger number of cases that the CDCreported cases. Most of these possible Zika cases are concentratedin the large metropolitan areas around New York City, Chicagoand Houston. Many of them are diagnosed and treated by the samehealthcare providers.The IMS sample captured 577 pregnant women with a possibleZika virus infection compared to the 168 pregnant women with apossible Zika virus infection reported in the U.S. Zika PregnancyRegistry as of May 24, 2016. Many of the pregnant women in the IMSsample had multiple visits, often in consecutive months, associatedwith the Zika virus disease diagnosis. Pregnant women are morelikely to be tested and diagnosed with a Zika virus infection due tothe risk of fetal malformations from the disease. As many as 250 ofthe 577 pregnant women with a possible Zika virus infection also hada diagnosis of suspected fetal damage due to a viral disease. Of allwomen with a possible Zika virus infection in the IMS sample, 120were in New Jersey, 111 in New York, 93 in Illinois and 74 in Texas,and most were concentrated in the large metropolitan areas aroundNew York City, Chicago and Houston.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that all-payer claims data can be usedsuccesfully to monitor Zika transmission trends at local and statelevel, especially with a focus on pregnant women. Healthcare claimsdata is fast, granular, relevant at local level and can be used tosupplement CDC ArboNET data for local and state level surveillanceand response to the evolving Zika virus infection outbreak. Thisstudy is an example of a novel approach to surveillance for Zika virusdisease and potentially many other infectious diseases.


2019 ◽  
Vol 113 (7) ◽  
pp. 290-290
Author(s):  
Carlo Ticconi ◽  
Giovanni Rezza

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 (S4) ◽  
pp. S327-S335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy S. Tang ◽  
Janice Lyu ◽  
Su Wang ◽  
Qingqing He ◽  
Perry Pong ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
Guilherme Sacchi De Camargo Correia ◽  
Sridevi Rajeeve ◽  
Lawrence Cytryn

Factor XI (FXI) deficiency is a rare bleeding disorder. In the general population, prevalence is estimated to be 1:1 million people for the homozygous presentation (PMID: 25100430). Nonetheless, in individuals of Ashkenazi and Iraqi Jewish ancestry, the prevalence of heterozygous cases is approximately 8% (PMID: 7811996). However, these numbers may be underestimates, as some patients are asymptomatic and, so, not accounted for. Pregnant women are a special population, as FXI deficiency may pose an increased risk during pregnancy and delivery. This study describes the experience of a General Hematology Outpatient Service to which pregnant women with FXI deficiency are referred. This case series aims to describe the clinical course of these patients, and any complications and interventions they may have experienced during pregnancy and delivery. This retrospective study identified a group of 49 patients with FXI deficiency who were evaluated by a single practitioner at the Hematology Outpatient Service at Mount Sinai West, in New York City, between October 2016 and February 2020. Patients were found to be FXI deficient on routine genetic screening early in their obstetric care. Their charts were reviewed, including epidemiological data, notes from Hematology and Obstetric Clinics and from the admission for delivery and laboratory results. Four patients were excluded from the final analysis: 3 who were not pregnant, and 1 who did not have FXI deficiency. Patients were seen in by the Hematology Service at least once during their pregnancy. FXI activity was measured at least twice during pregnancy: at the initial visit, and at about gestational week 37. The data were analyzed to obtain the mean and standard deviation for the most relevant clinical parameters. A comparison between FXI activity at the first visit and at last visit near term was made with a paired T-test. The included group of 45 patients presented a mean age at delivery of 34.09 years (range 26-45 years). Genetic data was available for 42 patients, with 2.38% being homozygous. Ethnicities were described for 39 patients, and 71.79% were identified as Ashkenazi Jewish. Among 39 patients who had their FXI gene (gene NM_000128.3) mutations described, the c.901T>C, p.F301L mutation was present in 61.54% of them. The mean FXI activity measured in the first appointment was 60.18%, (range 4-220%), while the mean FXI activity in week 37 of pregnancy was 52.08% (range 13-118%). When comparing the FXI activity on the first appointment and around week 37, no statistically significant difference was found (p=0.17). Four patients received preventive interventions on delivery. One patient was treated with Tranexamic Acid (TXA) and Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) transfusion due to a FXI activity of 21% on week 37, and received general anesthesia. Two patients received transfusion of FFP alone: 1 of them due to an elevated aPTT (57.4s) on delivery date, with no anesthesia on delivery; and the other one as a preventive measure in a patient with a FXI of 45% on week 37, but who was planned for a neuraxial block. A FXI activity of 40% is the cutoff for a neuraxial block by the Anesthesiology Department at our hospital. One patient was treated with TXA due to a borderline FXI activity of 42% and a personal history of bleeding on surgical procedures. She had an opioid patient-controlled analgesia on delivery. For the detailed data regarding mean blood loss on delivery, postpartum blood loss, and complete Hematologic and Obstetric data, see tables 1 and 2, and figures 1 and 2. Figure 3 presents a data comparison between the 2 most common genotypes observed. In our case series, no patient experienced bleeding complications during pregnancy or delivery. Monitoring FXI levels and aPTT throughout pregnancy and before delivery remains as the standard medical care (PMID: 27699729). The difference between FXI levels earlier in pregnancy and near delivery was not statistically significant, as noted in previous studies (PMID: 15199489). Checking FXI activity throughout pregnancy may not be necessary, and one measurement might be enough. Further study might be able to answer this question, as the optimal management of these patients remains a work in progress. Evidence for a reliable threshold FXI activity at which neuraxial anesthesia could be safely performed will be a valuable finding. Continuation of our study will allow for further data regarding the management of FXI deficient pregnant women. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (07) ◽  
pp. 731-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey A. Merriam ◽  
Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang ◽  
B. Isabel Huerta-Bogdan ◽  
Ronald Wapner ◽  
Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman

Objective Our institution is in an area of New York City with a large population of immigrants from Zika virus endemic areas. With the recent Zika virus outbreak, we sought to examine our center's experience with screening for Zika virus and outcomes among patients who tested positive for the disease during pregnancy. Study Design We performed a chart review of all pregnant patients who tested positive (positive serum or urine polymerase chain reaction [PCR]) or presumed positive (immunoglobulin M [IgM] enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] positive or IgM ELISA equivocal with positive plaque reduction neutralization test) for Zika virus. All tests were performed by the Department of Health (DOH) and followed Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines in effect at the time of specimen collection. Testing of cord blood, placenta, and/or neonatal blood were/was performed by the DOH for New York County. Prenatal ultrasounds for fetal head size and surveillance for calcifications were performed by maternal–fetal medicine specialists. Infant head ultrasound results were included when available. Results Between March 2016 and April 2017, 70 pregnant patients were positive or presumed positive for Zika infection during pregnancy. Of those, 16 women had positive urine or serum PCR and the remaining 54 were presumed positive. Among positive cases, five women tested positive via urine PCR only, nine women tested positive via serum PCR only, and two women had both positive urine and serum PCR. Fifteen of 67 infants (22%) born during the study period were born to mothers with positive urine or serum PCR testing. Sixty-five newborns were clinically normal with normal head measurements. Of the intracranial ultrasound performed, one infant had a grade 1 intraventricular hemorrhage, four had incidental choroid plexus cysts, and one had severe ventriculomegaly that was also noted antenatally. There were 2 positive and 15 equivocal infant serum IgM samples and 1 positive placental PCR from these pregnancies. There were four pregnancy terminations and two cases with fetal anomalies in this population that were split evenly between patients who tested positive and those who tested presumed positive for Zika virus during pregnancy. Conclusion We found no differences in pregnancy or neonatal outcomes between women who tested positive and presumed positive for Zika virus during pregnancy. Testing of infants and placenta tissue after delivery was largely inconclusive. Improvement in testing for Zika virus infection is needed to determine which pregnancies are at risk for congenital anomalies. Further research is still needed to determine which children are at risk for poor neurodevelopmental outcomes related to Zika virus and how to best coordinate care among the immigrant population during a new disease epidemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document