Effect of Chronic Kidney Disease on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Lower Extremity Peripheral Vascular Intervention

2017 ◽  
Vol 119 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe X. Xie ◽  
Thomas J. Glorioso ◽  
Philip B. Dattilo ◽  
Vikas Aggarwal ◽  
P. Michael Ho ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 1308-1316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis I. Narcisse ◽  
Elizabeth Hope Weissler ◽  
Jennifer A. Rymer ◽  
Ehrin J. Armstrong ◽  
Eric A. Secemsky ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nikhil Singh ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
Gregory A. Magee ◽  
David M. Shavelle ◽  
Vikram S. Kashyap ◽  
...  

Background: Despite current guidelines suggesting a benefit for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following peripheral vascular intervention (PVI), there are limited data on antiplatelet prescribing patterns post-procedure. We attempted to determine variables associated with DAPT prescription following lower extremity PVI. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients undergoing lower extremity PVI in the Vascular Quality Initiative (2017–2018) was performed. Participants not on anticoagulation or DAPT before the procedure were considered for the final analysis. Postdischarge antiplatelet therapy regimen rates were determined (none, aspirin only, P2Y12 inhibitor only, and DAPT). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine variables associated with DAPT initiation compared with those discharged on single-agent or no antiplatelet therapy. Results: A total of 16 597 procedures were included for analysis, with 49% initiated on DAPT post-PVI. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.12 [95% CI, 1.05–1.20]), smoking (OR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.09–1.32]), and coronary artery disease (OR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.11–1.27]) were associated with an increased likelihood of post-PVI DAPT prescription. Procedures requiring multiple types of interventions (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.15–1.42]), stent placement (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.06–1.27]), and with complications (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14–1.52]) were also positively associated with DAPT prescription. Conclusions: In patients not already receiving anticoagulation or on DAPT at the time of lower extremity PVI, prescription of DAPT following intervention is ≈50%. Multiple factors were associated with the decision for DAPT versus single antiplatelet therapy, and further study is required to understand how this affects postintervention adverse limb and cardiovascular events.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace J Wang ◽  
Dejah R Judelson ◽  
Philip P Goodney ◽  
Daniel J Bertges

Loss to follow-up (LTF) has been associated with worse outcomes after procedures. We sought to identify differences in lower extremity peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) patients with and without LTF, and to determine if LTF impacted survival. Patients in the PVI registry of the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) were included ( n = 39,342), where t-test and chi-squared analysis were used to compare those with and without LTF. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with LTF while Cox regression analysis was applied to compare survival among those with and without LTF. The overall 1-year follow-up rate was 91.6%. LTF patients were more often male, Hispanic, of black race, and had a higher rate of diabetes, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, and dialysis. LTF patients had a higher prevalence of critical limb ischemia, underwent popliteal or distal intervention, and were intervened upon urgently. There was also a higher rate of postoperative complications, and a lower rate of technical success for LTF patients. After controlling for center effects, the independent variables associated with LTF included male sex, age, diabetes, dialysis dependence, ASA class 3 or greater, as well as complications requiring admission. Preoperative aspirin, preadmission home living status, prior carotid intervention, and discharge aspirin were protective against LTF. Adjusted survival analysis showed decreased survival in LTF, with those returning face-to-face surviving longer than those with phone follow-up. Efforts should be focused on understanding these differences to improve follow-up rates and help improve overall survival.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Nakamura ◽  
Kenjiro Sato ◽  
Hideaki Endo

Abstract BackgroundPositioning a patient on the catheterization table is important for proper cardiac or respiratory function during peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs). Fowler’s position, where the patient’s head is a 45-degree angle, is more effective in reducing venous blood volume returning to the heart from the periphery compared to the supine position. The Terumo R2P® system has been developed for transradial PVI.Case presentationTwo patients with heart failure (HF) underwent lower-extremity PVI in Fowler’s position to prevent worsening HF. Because their head position was opposite the C-arm of the X-ray machine, the left radial artery was selected as the access site. The Terumo R2P® system was used for transradial PVI. We successfully treated superficial artery diseases with long shaft balloons and rapid-exchange Terumo R2P® Misago® stents. ConclusionsAlthough lower-extremity PVI using Fowler’s position and the Terumo R2P® system has several limitations, including device availability and technical complexity, it may be effective for particular patients who have higher risk of worsening HF in the supine position.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document