Pain Management in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Computerized Decision Support Tool

Author(s):  
Lara Dhingra ◽  
Robert Schiller ◽  
Raymond Teets ◽  
Sarah Nosal ◽  
Nathan F. Dieckmann ◽  
...  
Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Rieckert ◽  
Annette Becker ◽  
Norbert Donner-Banzhof ◽  
Annika Viniol ◽  
Bettina Bücker ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are increasingly being prescribed, although long-term use is associated with multiple side effects. Therefore, an electronic decision support tool with the aim of reducing the long-term use of PPIs in a shared decision-making process between general practitioners (GPs) and their patients has been developed. The developed tool is a module that can be added to the so-called arriba decision support tool, which is already used by GPs in Germany in routine care. In this large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial we evaluate the effectiveness of this arriba-PPI tool. Methods The arriba-PPI tool is an electronic decision support system that supports shared decision-making and evidence-based decisions around the long-term use of PPIs at the point of care. The tool will be evaluated in a cluster-randomized controlled trial involving 210 GP practices and 3150 patients in Germany. GP practices will be asked to recruit 20 patients aged ≥ 18 years regularly taking PPIs for ≥ 6 months. After completion of patient recruitment, each GP practice with enrolled patients will be cluster-randomized. Intervention GP practices will get access to the software arriba-PPI, whereas control GPs will treat their patients as usual. After an observation period of six months, GP practices will be compared regarding the reduction of cumulated defined daily doses of PPI prescriptions per patient. Discussion Our principal hypothesis is that the application of the arriba-PPI tool can reduce PPI prescribing in primary care by at least 15% compared to conventional strategies used by GPs. A positive result implies the implementation of the arriba-PPI tool in routine care. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00016364. Registered on 31 January 2019.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 1071-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Areej El-Jawahri ◽  
Susan L. Mitchell ◽  
Michael K. Paasche-Orlow ◽  
Jennifer S. Temel ◽  
Vicki A. Jackson ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo E. Volandes ◽  
Michael K. Paasche-Orlow ◽  
Susan L. Mitchell ◽  
Areej El-Jawahri ◽  
Aretha Delight Davis ◽  
...  

Purpose Decision making regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is challenging. This study examined the effect of a video decision support tool on CPR preferences among patients with advanced cancer. Patients and Methods We performed a randomized controlled trial of 150 patients with advanced cancer from four oncology centers. Participants in the control arm (n = 80) listened to a verbal narrative describing CPR and the likelihood of successful resuscitation. Participants in the intervention arm (n = 70) listened to the identical narrative and viewed a 3-minute video depicting a patient on a ventilator and CPR being performed on a simulated patient. The primary outcome was participants' preference for or against CPR measured immediately after exposure to either modality. Secondary outcomes were participants' knowledge of CPR (score range of 0 to 4, with higher score indicating more knowledge) and comfort with video. Results The mean age of participants was 62 years (standard deviation, 11 years); 49% were women, 44% were African American or Latino, and 47% had lung or colon cancer. After the verbal narrative, in the control arm, 38 participants (48%) wanted CPR, 41 (51%) wanted no CPR, and one (1%) was uncertain. In contrast, in the intervention arm, 14 participants (20%) wanted CPR, 55 (79%) wanted no CPR, and 1 (1%) was uncertain (unadjusted odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.7 to 7.2; P < .001). Mean knowledge scores were higher in the intervention arm than in the control arm (3.3 ± 1.0 v 2.6 ± 1.3, respectively; P < .001), and 65 participants (93%) in the intervention arm were comfortable watching the video. Conclusion Participants with advanced cancer who viewed a video of CPR were less likely to opt for CPR than those who listened to a verbal narrative.


Circulation ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 134 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Areej El-Jawahri ◽  
Michael K. Paasche-Orlow ◽  
Dan Matlock ◽  
Lynne Warner Stevenson ◽  
Eldrin F. Lewis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document