Improved breast cancer survival among hormone replacement therapy users is durable after 5 years of additional follow-up

2008 ◽  
Vol 196 (4) ◽  
pp. 505-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dara Christante ◽  
SuEllen Pommier ◽  
Jennifer Garreau ◽  
Patrick Muller ◽  
Brett LaFleur ◽  
...  
2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 541-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. DiSaia ◽  
Wendy R. Brewster ◽  
Argyrios Ziogas ◽  
Hoda Anton-Culver

2006 ◽  
Vol 154 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kati Pentti ◽  
Risto Honkanen ◽  
Marjo T Tuppurainen ◽  
Lorenzo Sandini ◽  
Heikki Kröger ◽  
...  

Objectives: To analyze prospectively the association between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and mortality in women before old age. Design and methods: A group of 11 667 women (91% of the age cohort of the area) aged 52–62 years from the population-based Kuopio Osteoporosis Risk Factor and Prevention Study were followed for 7 years in 1994–2001. Information about HRT use and health events was obtained from two repeated questionnaires in 1989 and 1994. Information about deaths and causes of death from the follow-up period was obtained from the Statistics Finland. Cox’s proportional-hazards models were used to calculate risk of death related to the use of HRT. Results: At the start of follow-up, 2203 women had used HRT >5 years, 3945 women ≤5 years and 5519 women had never used it. During the follow-up, 361 deaths occurred. Compared with non-users of HRT, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of death from any cause was 1.05 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80–1.36) in women who used HRT ≤5 years and 1.06 (95% CI 0.78–1.46) in women who used HRT >5 years. The adjusted HR for coronary heart disease (CHD) mortality in women who used HRT ≤5 years was 0.79 (95% CI 0.36–1.73), and in women who used HRT >5 years, 2.16 (95% CI 0.93–4.98). For breast cancer mortality the adjusted HR for ≤5 years of HRT use was 0.96 (95% CI 0.32–2.82) and 2.62 (95% CI 0.98–7.00) for >5 years of HRT use. Conclusions: History of HRT use does not affect overall or CHD mortality in women. More than 5 years of HRT use may increase the risk of breast cancer mortality.


2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia Fahlén ◽  
Tommy Fornander ◽  
Hemming Johansson ◽  
Ulla Johansson ◽  
Lars-Erik Rutqvist ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10518-10518 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Y. Chen ◽  
S. E. Hankinson ◽  
B. Rosner ◽  
G. A. Colditz

10518 Background: Although current use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with a greater risk of breast cancer than past use, the effects of longer term past use of HRT are not well quantified. Methods: We examined the relationship between past HRT use and invasive breast cancer risk within the Nurses’ Health Study, a prospective cohort of 121,700 registered nurses aged 30–55 in 1976 who update information on cancer risk factors and outcomes through biennial questionnaires. For this analysis, the follow-up period was 1980 through 2004 and only included person-time for postmenopausal women. Status of HRT use (never, past, or current), type of HRT (oral unopposed estrogen (E alone) or combination oral estrogen + progesterone (E+P)), and duration of HRT use were assessed every 2 years and defined prospectively. Proportional hazards models controlled for age, body mass index, parity, age at first birth, family history of breast cancer, benign breast disease, alcohol consumption, type of menopause, and ages at menarche and menopause. Results: During 1,388,368 person-years of follow-up among postmenopausal women, invasive breast cancer was diagnosed among 1,554 women who had never used HRT, 459 past users of E+P and 527 past users of E alone. Regardless of duration of use, past use of E alone was not associated with breast cancer risk. Although past use of E+P for less than 10 years was not associated with breast cancer risk (RR (95% CI) 1.01 (0.88–1.17) for < 5 years and 0.95 (0.74–1.21) for 5–9.9 years), past use of E+P for greater than 10 years was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer (RR 1.53 (1.09–2.16) for 10–14.9 years and 1.48 (0.87–2.51) for 15 or more years). Results were similar regardless of time since last use, although power was limited for this subgroup analysis. Conclusions: Past use of E+P for greater than 10 years was associated with a persistent elevation in breast cancer risk. The relationship between duration of past use and breast cancer risk did not appear linear, but suggested a possible threshold effect. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 3991-3996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivana Sestak ◽  
Roseann Kealy ◽  
Robert Edwards ◽  
John Forbes ◽  
Jack Cuzick

Purpose Tamoxifen is an effective drug, but its role in prevention is limited by its adverse effect profile. Non–life-threatening adverse effects, such as vasomotor symptoms, have an important influence in its use for prevention. Vasomotor symptoms were evaluated according to follow-up time, severity, and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in a retrospective analysis. Patients and Methods In the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study-I study, 7,154 women at increased risk of breast cancer were randomly assigned to either tamoxifen 20 mg/d or placebo for 5 years. Women gave detailed information on any vasomotor symptoms at each 6-month follow-up visit. Results Hot flushes were reported more often in the tamoxifen group than in the placebo group (70.6% v 57.1%, respectively; odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.63 to 1.99). Severe hot flushes were more strongly related to tamoxifen. In the tamoxifen arm, more women taking HRT at entry experienced hot flushes in the first 6 months than those who did not take HRT (60.8% v 49.2%, respectively; P = .09). In contrast, women on placebo taking HRT at entry experienced fewer hot flushes than women who stopped HRT (22.9% v 34.3%, respectively; P = .03). Furthermore, for women who first began HRT in the first 6 months of the trial compared with women who did not begin HRT, HRT seemed to be much more effective in controlling hot flushes in months 6 to 12 in the placebo arm (47.9% v 20.4%, respectively) than in the tamoxifen arm (51.4% v 39.0%, respectively). Conclusion HRT use at entry or during the trial was not effective in alleviating hot flushes for women in the tamoxifen arm. Our retrospective study suggests that estrogen-based HRT has limited effectiveness among women receiving tamoxifen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document