scholarly journals “Tocilizumab-an option for patients with COVID-19 associated cytokine release syndrome: A single center experience”, a retrospective study-original article

2021 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 102165
Author(s):  
Aijaz Zeeshan Khan Chachar ◽  
Khurshid Ahmed Khan ◽  
Javeid Iqbal ◽  
Adnan Hussain Shahid ◽  
Mohsin Asif ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110282
Author(s):  
Karan Raja ◽  
Nicole Daniel ◽  
Susan Morrison ◽  
Ruben Patel ◽  
Jessica Gerges ◽  
...  

Background: Tocilizumab is an interleukin-6 receptor antagonist hypothesized to blunt the uncontrolled immune response, cytokine release syndrome, in severe COVID-19 and prevent attributable morbidity and mortality. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of tocilizumab on clinical outcomes in COVID-19-associated cytokine release syndrome. Methods: Single-center, retrospective cohort study assessing sixty-nine adult patients receiving tocilizumab for suspected COVID-19 cytokine release syndrome. The primary outcome was change in WHO clinical status scale on day seven post-dose analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Secondary outcomes assessed impact of timing of administration on clinical outcome. Safety analyses included development of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and sepsis within 7 days post-dose. Statistical analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel. Results: No aggregate clinical change was found between day 0 and day 7. Eleven patients improved, twenty-seven worsened, and thirty-one showed no change. Clinical outcomes were weakly correlated with time from symptom onset (rs = 0.21; p = 0.08) or hospital admission (rs = -0.08; p = 0.49) to dose. In-hospital mortality was 63%. Sepsis was diagnosed in 21 patients, five of which were post-dose. Transaminitis, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in seven, one, and six patients, respectively. Conclusion: Tocilizumab did not appear to influence clinical outcomes in our study population, irrespective of timing of administration. Adverse events were not considered drug-related.


2014 ◽  
Vol 156 (6) ◽  
pp. 1189-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehab Shiban ◽  
Insa Janssen ◽  
Maria Wostrack ◽  
Sandro M Krieg ◽  
Florian Ringel ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. AB328
Author(s):  
Amine Benmassaoud ◽  
Mark S. Sasson ◽  
Jean C. Pamphile ◽  
Myriam Martel ◽  
Constantine A. Soulellis ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. S233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amandeep Salhotra ◽  
Michelle Afkhami ◽  
Dongyun Yang ◽  
Sally Mokhtari ◽  
Dongqing Gu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20007-e20007
Author(s):  
Jung Kye ◽  
Magdalena Seyer ◽  
Samit Patel ◽  
Eun-Jeong Kim ◽  
Rhonda Hewitt ◽  
...  

e20007 Background: Daratumumab (Dara) is a CD38-directed monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and light-chain amyloidosis (AL). Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) have been reported in 28-56% of individuals receiving the conventional intravenous (IV) formulation, necessitating slow infusions and frequent use of rescue medications to mitigate complications. Recently subcutaneous (SC) Dara received approval in MM, and randomized data suggests a lower rate of IRRs compared to IV Dara. Guidelines regarding post-injection monitoring with SC Dara are not well established. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the safety of SC Dara in patients with MM and AL, and to suggest guidelines for monitoring following SC Dara administration. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included patients treated with MM or AL receiving SC Dara between June 2020 and December 2020. The primary outcome of the study was incidence of IRRs. Secondary outcomes include timing and severity of IRRs based on CTCAE version 4.0. Results: A total of 82 patients received SC Dara during the study period. Of these 82, forty-nine (60%) had previously received Dara (Dara-exposed), and 33 patients (40%) were Dara-naïve. Eight of the 82 patients (9.8%) experienced an IRR. All were grade 1 (n=5, 63%) or grade 2 (n=3, 38%) in severity. Seven patients in the Dara-naïve group experienced an IRR (21%), and one patient in the Dara-exposed group (2%) experienced injection-site erythema with the second SC dose after transitioning from IV. Three patients experienced reactions immediately after SC Dara administration, and four patients experienced delayed reactions >4 hours after SC Dara administration (median 11.9 hours; range 5-24). Among those with delayed reactions, three experienced reactions after being discharged from the treatment area but symptoms resolved without any intervention. Conclusions: In this single-center study of patients receiving SC Dara, IRRs occurred in about 10% of patients, and were more likely with a patient’s first dose of SC Dara. All reactions were mild to moderate in severity and could be managed in the outpatient setting. We suggest that Dara-naïve patients receiving their 1st SC Dara dose be monitored for one hour after SC Dara administration. Monitoring does not appear necessary for patients transitioning from IV to SC Dara or receiving subsequent doses of SC Dara. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document