Patterns and causes of breeding dispersal in a declining population of Canada jays, Perisoreus canadensis, over 55 years

2021 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 31-41
Author(s):  
Matthew Fuirst ◽  
Dan Strickland ◽  
D. Ryan Norris
Bird Behavior ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Waite ◽  
John D. Reevet

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Strickland ◽  
Henri R. Ouellet

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 332-339
Author(s):  
D. Strickland ◽  
E. Brouwer ◽  
T.M. Burg

A neglected question in the study of communal breeding concerns why alloparental behaviour begins at variously late stages in the breeding cycle. In group-living corvids, the delay tends to be longer in species that are small and (or) typically have only a small nonbreeder complement. This pattern has been attributed to the relatively poor defensive capabilities of such species and their consequently greater need to minimize predator-attracting traffic to the nest or fledglings. We tested this predator avoidance hypothesis with the Canada Jay (Perisoreus canadensis (Linnaeus, 1766)), a species in which the feeding of young by any nonbreeders in the family group is delayed until the fledgling period. We reasoned that, on Anticosti Island, Quebec (Canada), in the absence of squirrels and other nest predators, nonbreeders might be permitted to feed nestlings as well as fledglings, and that breeders might feed nestlings more frequently (with smaller food loads) than on the mainland. We found no evidence for either prediction and thus no support for the predator avoidance hypothesis but suggest that Anticosti Canada Jays may have had insufficient time to evolve behaviour more appropriate for their predator-free environment. Secondarily, we confirmed that in all observed instances, the nonbreeders were offspring of the breeding pair from previous years and that they therefore failed to provision nestlings in spite of an apparent genetic interest to do so.


2017 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 204-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rowan Mott ◽  
Ashley Herrod ◽  
Rohan H. Clarke
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Waite ◽  
K. L. Field

2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Adrian L. Wolf ◽  
Gary L. Slater ◽  
Scott F. Pearson ◽  
Hannah E. Anderson ◽  
Randall Moore

The Condor ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (3) ◽  
pp. 566-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Seamans ◽  
R.J. Gutiérrez

Abstract Abstract. Understanding the effect of habitat alteration on avian behavior is important for understanding a species' ecology and ensuring its conservation. Therefore, we examined the relationship between Spotted Owl habitat selection and variation in habitat in the Sierra Nevada. We estimated habitat selection by modeling the probability of territory colonization (γ), territory extinction (ε), and breeding dispersal in relation to the amount of mature conifer forest within and among territories. Alteration of ≥20 ha of mature conifer forest (coniferous forest with >70% canopy cover dominated by medium [30.4–60.9 cm dbh] and large [>60.9 cm dbh] trees) within individual territories (n  =  66) was negatively related to territory colonization and positively related to breeding dispersal probability. Although territory extinction was negatively related to the amount of mature conifer forest, it was not clear whether this relationship was due to variation of mature conifer forest within or among territories. Although modeling results for territory colonization and extinction generally supported the hypothesis that individuals are “ideal” when selecting a habitat in the sense that they settle in the highest-quality site available, we did not find a clear benefit in terms of habitat quality for Spotted Owls that exhibited breeding dispersal.


2005 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn L. Rogers

During 16 August to 21 September 1984, I determined how Gray Jays (Perisoreus canadensis) carried flight-loads of different weights. Three individually identifiable Gray Jays weighing 60, 68, and 80 grams, used their bills to carry flight-loads weighing up to 33 percent of bodyweight but transferred heavier flight-loads from their bills to their feet 1-2 meters after takeoff. They had difficulty carrying flight-loads over 57 percent of bodyweight, and none attempted to carry flight-loads over 66 percent of bodyweight. By using their feet to bring heavy flight-loads closer to the center of lift, Gray Jays can carry heavier loads of meat, relative to body weight, than can Common Ravens (Corvus corax) which compete with Gray Jays at carcasses in winter and which do not carry objects with their feet. During 1969-2003, year-round observations near the southern edge of the Gray Jay range in northeastern Minnesota showed that caching behavior begins in August, continues over-winter, and ends at the onset of insect activity and green-up in early May. Gray Jays’ propensity to approach larger animals, including people, may not indicate unwariness but rather a superior ability and willingness to assess risks and food benefits. In the boreal forest in winter, risk of starvation is greater and risk of predation is lower than in relatively food-rich ecoregions farther south.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document