scholarly journals Estimating tourism social carrying capacity

2020 ◽  
pp. 102971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksana Tokarchuk ◽  
Roberto Gabriele ◽  
Oswin Maurer
2021 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 02004
Author(s):  
Mohamad Pirdaus bin Yusoh ◽  
Jabil Mapjabil ◽  
Nurhazliyana Hanafi ◽  
Mohd Azmi bin Muhammed Idris

In driving sustainable tourism, the concept of carrying capacity in tourism needs to be applied. This concept of carrying capacity gives a comprehensive emphasis in the development of tourism whether in physical, social or economic aspects. If this concept is applied, it is in determining the situation in a tourist destination whether it is still in a state that can be accepted by the stakeholders in tourism, namely tourists, locals and tour operators. In this paper, emphasis is given to social carrying capacity in tourism which is one of the parts in tourism carrying capacity. This social capacity is the most difficult part to examine because it involves unequal perceptions and views from various parties. It involves interactions between tourists and tourists that cover issues of congestion and the quality of their tourism and interactions between tourists and locals or hosts that involve issues of their quality of life. Due to that, this social capacity is quite difficult to implement in some tourist areas.


2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 77-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Manning ◽  
William Valliere ◽  
Benjamin Wang ◽  
Steven Lawson ◽  
Peter Newman

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 2429-2445
Author(s):  
Jose Ruiz‐Chico ◽  
José Maria Biedma‐Ferrer ◽  
Antonio Rafael Peña‐Sánchez ◽  
Mercedes Jiménez‐García

1983 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-5
Author(s):  
Susan Duda

In 1979, the University of Kentucky Department of Anthropology began two projects: The Big South Fork Folklife Study and Two Kentucky Wild Rivers: Present and Anticipated Demand, Public Preferences and Social Carrying Capacity. Although the two projects differed in scope, in sources of funding, in specific objectives, and in methodology, they shared the goal of providing sociocultural data necessary for adequate recreational planning and management of the region's water resources. Billie DeWalt has served as co-principal investigator of both projects, sharing that responsibility with Benita Howell in the Big South Fork study and with Eugenie Scott in the Kentucky Wild Rivers study. In addition to providing management data for planners, both projects have provided employment and research opportunities for numerous graduate assistants. So far, the products of both projects include four masters theses, numerous papers presented at meetings, and various technical reports. A symposium on recreational development in Eastern Kentucky, presented at the 1982 Society for Applied Anthropology Meetings, focused on interrelating the issues and findings common to both projects. The final report of the Big South Fork Folklife Study has been published (Howell 1981), and the final report of the Wild Rivers Project is forthcoming.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document