Insurance Status and Access to Urgent Primary Care Follow-up After an Emergency Department Visit in 2016

Background: The objective of this study was to compare health care utilization and costs between matched cohorts of chronic pain patients treated with the opioids tapentadol extended release (ER) or oxycodone controlled release (CR). Methods: This retrospective study used claims data from the Optum Research Database. Commercial and Medicare Advantage adult patients with ≥1 prescription fill for oxycodone CR or tapentadol ER between September 1, 2011 and September 30, 2012 were eligible. The date of the first observed oxycodone CR or tapentadol ER claim was the index date. Patients had continuous health plan enrollment for 6 months before and after the index date, ≥ 90 days supply of opioid therapy, and no index drug claims in the preindex period. Patients were propensity score matched in a 1:2 ratio (tapentadol ER : oxycodone CR). Results: The attributes of the matched cohorts (1,120 tapentadol ER and 2,240 oxycodone CR patients) appeared similar. In the 6 month post-index period, lower proportions of the tapentadol ER cohort than the oxycodone CR cohort had ≥1 inpatient stay (14.6% versus 20.5%; p<0.001) and ≥1 emergency department visit (33.4% versus 37.5%; p=0.021). The tapentadol ER compared with the oxycodone CR cohort had higher mean pharmacy costs ($4,263 versus $3,694; p <0.001), lower mean inpatient costs ($3,625 versus $6,309; p<0.001), and lower mean total healthcare costs ($16,510 versus $19,330; p=0.004). Conclusions: During follow-up, total mean healthcare costs were lower among tapentadol ER patients than oxycodone CR patients, and tapentadol ER patients were less likely to have an inpatient admission or emergency department visit.

Download Full-text

Emergency Department Visit Rates for Motor Vehicle Crashes by Selected Characteristics in the United States, 2017-2018

10.15620/cdc:106460 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Danielle Davis ◽

Christopher Cairns

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Emergency Department ◽

Emergency Department Visit ◽

Race And Ethnicity ◽

Motor Vehicle ◽

The United States ◽

Motor Vehicle Crashes ◽

Insurance Status ◽

Vehicle Crashes ◽

Health Insurance Status

This report presents emergency department visit rates for motor vehicle crashes by age, race and ethnicity, health insurance status, and region.

Download Full-text

Abstract TP356: Post-Acute Stroke Experience Survey- Development and Pilot Testing

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.51.suppl_1.tp356 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Jane A Anderson ◽

Barbara Kimmel ◽

Kirt Martin ◽

Anette Ovalle ◽

Chizoba Ifeorah ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Health Insurance ◽

Care Provider ◽

Primary Care Provider ◽

Claims Data ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Insurance Status ◽

Stroke Survivors ◽

Health Insurance Status

Background: Administrative claims data show variability in post-acute stroke care. Stroke survivors without health insurance are not included in claims data statistics. The PASES survey was developed and tested to describe stroke care experience of underserved survivors participating in V-STOP a telehealth self-management program. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were completed to elicit feedback from survivors on experiences during their stroke event, emergency and hospital care, and after discharge. Items on PASES were established based on participants’ responses and survey was piloted in a sample of underserved survivors (N=95). Descriptive statistics and Chi-square analysis were applied to describe stroke survivors’ experiences and differences based on health insurance status. Results: The sample was 45% female, mean age 57, 18% Black and 60% Hispanic. Most (60%) had an annual income of less than $25,000 and 44% had no insurance. Only 25% reported calling 911. However (60%) report presenting to a hospital within 2 hours of stroke symptoms recognition. Nearly half (42%) reported not knowing whether they received a “clot dissolving” medication. Fifty-four percent did not receive rehabilitation after discharge. Eighty-percent reported seeing a healthcare provider after discharge. Most (61%) saw a primary care provider and 22% saw a neurologist. However, only 24% reported seeing a provider within one month of hospital discharge. No significant differences were identified between insured vs. uninsured with respect to race, ethnicity, income, calling 911, receiving inpatient rehab, seeing a provider after discharge and follow up with primary care provider vs. neurologist. Significant differences were identified between insured vs. uninsured with respect to presenting to a hospital within 2 hours of stroke symptoms (35 vs 18 [p=0.023]) and in receiving no rehab after discharge (27 vs 12 [p=0.02]). Conclusion: Results suggest low utilization of EMS, delayed presentation to hospital, limited access to rehabilitation after discharge and limited access to timely follow-up with stroke specialist among underserved stroke survivors. Health insurance status may influence delayed hospital presentation and access to rehabilitation services.

Download Full-text