Low Rates of Follow-Up With Primary Care Providers After Pediatric Emergency Department Visits for Respiratory Tract Illnesses

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 956-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danica B. Liberman ◽  
Deborah Q. Shelef ◽  
Jianping He ◽  
Robert McCarter ◽  
Stephen J. Teach
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Respiratory Tract ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Department ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Respiratory Tract Illnesses

scholarly journals Adjacent Primary Care May Reduce Less Urgent Pediatric Emergency Department Visits

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 215013272092627
Author(s):  
Julia Ellbrant ◽  
Jonas Åkeson ◽  
Helena Sletten ◽  
Jenny Eckner ◽  
Pia Karlsland Åkeson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Department ◽  
Hospital Data ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Ed Visits

Aims: Pediatric emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a challenge. This study was designed to evaluate if a hospital-integrated primary care unit (HPCU) reduces less urgent visits at a pediatric ED. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out at a university hospital in Sweden, where the HPCU, open outside office hours, had been integrated next to the ED. Children seeking ED care during 4-week high- and low-load study periods before (2012) and after (2015) implementation of the HPCU were included. Information on patient characteristics, ED management, and length of ED stay was obtained from hospital data registers. Results: In total, 3216 and 3074 ED patient visits were recorded in 2012 and 2015, respectively. During opening hours of the HPCU, the proportions of pediatric ED visits (28% lower; P < .001), visits in the lowest triage group (36% lower; P < .001), patients presenting with fever ( P = .001) or ear pain ( P < .001), and nonadmitted ED patients ( P = .033), were significantly lower in 2015 than in 2012, whereas the proportion of infants ≤3 months was higher in 2015 ( P < .001). Conclusions: By enabling adjacent management of less urgent pediatric patients at adequate lower levels of medical care, implementation of a HPCU outside office hours may contribute to fewer and more appropriate pediatric ED visits.

Is Continuity of Care Preserved in Children Who Utilize the Pediatric Emergency Department?

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-41
Author(s):  
Patrick M. Vivier ◽  
William J. Lewander ◽  
Stanley H. Block ◽  
Peter R. Simon ◽  
Anthony J. Alario ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Inner City ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Continuity Of Care ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Health Centers ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Department ◽  
Primary Care Site

Objective. Inner city families often use multiple sites for nonemergent medical care, including the pediatric emergency department. This practice raises concerns about continuity of care. The present study examined one aspect of continuity of care: Do children who receive care in a pediatric emergency department return to their primary care site so that appropriate follow up may be obtained? Methods. Over a 4-week period two groups of neighborhood health center children were studied: Those who sought care at the pediatric emergency department and those who were "walk-ins" at the health centers. All visits during the 4-week study period which resulted in a recommendation for the child to be seen within 6 weeks at the health centers were included in the analysis. Results. During the study period there were 87 patient visits to the pediatric emergency department with a documented physician instruction to be seen at their health center within 6 weeks. In 66 (76%) of the cases, the patient was seen at one of the health centers during the 6 weeks following the pediatric emergency department visit. There were 146 "walk-in" visits to the health centers with a documented physician instruction to be seen again at the health centers during the 6 weeks following the walk-in visit. In 111 (76%) of the cases, the patient was seen during the 6-week period. Conclusion. Our study shows that revisit rates were comparable for the two groups. We conclude that the rate of compliance with follow-up recommendations is similar for those who utilized the pediatric emergency department versus those who used the primary care site.

Access to Outpatient Follow-Up Orthopedic Care After Pediatric Emergency Department Visits

2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 659-663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse J. Sturm ◽  
Daniel A. Hirsh ◽  
Robert Massey ◽  
Naghma S. Khan ◽  
Harold K. Simon
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Department ◽  
Orthopedic Care

scholarly journals Evaluation of a multidisciplinary lipid clinic to improve the care of individuals with severe lipid conditions: a RE-AIM framework analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laney K. Jones ◽  
Megan McMinn ◽  
David Kann ◽  
Michael Lesko ◽  
Amy C. Sturm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Program Effectiveness ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Lipid Levels ◽  
Framework Analysis ◽  
Lipid Clinic ◽  
Adherence Counseling ◽  
Clinically Significant

Abstract Background Individuals with complex dyslipidemia, or those with medication intolerance, are often difficult to manage in primary care. They require the additional attention, expertise, and adherence counseling that occurs in multidisciplinary lipid clinics (MDLCs). We conducted a program evaluation of the first year of a newly implemented MDLC utilizing the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework to provide empirical data not only on program effectiveness, but also on components important to local sustainability and future generalizability. Methods The purpose of the MDLC is to increase the uptake of guideline-based care for lipid conditions. Established in 2019, the MDLC provides care via a centralized clinic location within the healthcare system. Primary care providers and cardiologists were invited to refer individuals with lipid conditions. Using a pre/post-study design, we evaluated the implementation outcomes from the MDLC using the RE-AIM framework. Results In 2019, 420 referrals were made to the MDLC (reach). Referrals were made by 19% (148) of the 796 active cardiology and primary care providers, with an average of 35 patient referrals per month in 2019 (SD 12) (adoption). The MDLC saw 83 patients in 2019 (reach). Additionally, 50% (41/82) had at least one follow-up MDLC visit, and 12% (10/82) had two or more follow-up visits in 2019 (implementation). In patients seen by the MDLC, we found an improved diagnosis of specific lipid conditions (FH (familial hypercholesterolemia), hypertriglyceridemia, and dyslipidemia), increased prescribing of evidence-based therapies, high rates of medication prior authorization approvals, and significant reductions in lipid levels by lipid condition subgroup (effectiveness). Over time, the operations team decided to transition from in-person follow-up to telehealth appointments to increase capacity and sustain the clinic (maintenance). Conclusions Despite limited reach and adoption of the MDLC, we found a large intervention effect that included improved diagnosis, increased prescribing of guideline-recommended treatments, and clinically significant reduction of lipid levels. Attention to factors including solutions to decrease the large burden of unseen referrals, discussion of the appropriate number and duration of visits, and sustainability of the clinic model could aid in enhancing the success of the MDLC and improving outcomes for more patients throughout the system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document