Major abdominal surgery for cancer: Does epidural analgesia have a long-term effect on recurrence-free and overall survival?

2013 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. e81-e88 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Binczak ◽  
E. Tournay ◽  
V. Billard ◽  
A. Rey ◽  
C. Jayr
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000465
Author(s):  
C.Tji-Joong Gan ◽  
Chris Ward ◽  
Gerard Meachery ◽  
James Laurence Lordan ◽  
Andrew J Fisher ◽  
...  

IntroductionAzithromycin stabilises and improves lung function forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in lung transplantation patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). A post hoc analysis was performed to assess the long-term effect of azithromycin on FEV1, BOS progression and survival .MethodsEligible patients recruited for the initial randomised placebo-controlled trial received open-label azithromycin after 3 months and were followed up until 6 years after inclusion (n=45) to assess FEV1, BOS free progression and overall survival.ResultsFEV1 in the placebo group improved after open-label azithromycin and was comparable with the treatment group by 6 months. FEV1 decreased after 1 and 5 years and was not different between groups. Patients (n=18) with rapid progression of BOS underwent total lymphoid irradiation (TLI). Progression-free survival (log-rank test p=0.40) and overall survival (log-rank test p=0.28) were comparable. Survival of patients with early BOS was similar to late-onset BOS (log-rank test p=0.74).DiscussionLong-term treatment with azithromycin slows down the progression of BOS, although the effect of TLI may affect the observed attenuation of FEV1 decline. BOS progression and long-term survival were not affected by randomisation to the placebo group, given the early cross-over to azithromycin and possibly due to TLI in case of further progression. Performing randomised placebo-controlled trials in lung transplantation patients with BOS with a blinded trial duration is feasible, effective and safe.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2791-2791
Author(s):  
Timo Schinkothe ◽  
Michael J. Hallek ◽  
Peter Staib

Abstract Fludarabine is the most successful drug in patients with relapsed, progradient or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). But also the use of fludarabine in primary therapy as an alternative to chlorambucil is in trial. Fludarabine induces higher response rates, but showed no improvement in overall survival. The reason for this clinical observation is unclear. In the present study we wanted to answer the question, if the induction of secondary resistance might be the cause for this contradiction. METHODS. Peripheral blood samples from 42 patients with B-CLL were tested in the in-vitro chemosensitivity-test DiSC-assay with 11 drugs. 10 patients had received no therapy before the time of carrying out the In vitro test. 23 patients were pre-treated with prednisone, 8 patient with fludarabine and 5 patients with vincristine. Most of the patients received more then one drug before testing. The chemosensitivity were determined using the LC90. RESULTS. The patients were divided into those who were pre-treated vs. not pre-treated with the fludarabine, prednisone or vincristine. The influences of pre-treatment to the sensitivity were analysed using the Mann-Whitney-U test for two independent groups. With fludarabine pre-treated patients had an significantly increased chemoresistance against fludarabine (2.4-fold; p=.004). The increase was also significant for bendamustin (4.4-fold), 2-CdA (3.4-fold), Gemcitabine (2.7-fold) and daunorubicin (1.5-fold). There was no significant influence observed onto the other drugs. Pre-treatment with vincristine or prednisone had no impact onto the chemosensitivity of any tested drug. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS. The results of this study demonstrate the capability of fludarabine to increase the chemoresistance against various drugs in CLL. The use of fludarabine in primary therapy should be discussable. The fact that fludarabine induces higher response rates, without an improvement in overall survival, might be understandable if the fludarabine treatment induces a negative long-term effect. The widely increase of the chemoresistance is such a negative long-term effect. Based on the presented data, we postulate that fludarabine induces a so called secondary resistance by selecting leukemic cells with a lower chemosensitivity under treatment.


2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas T. Breuer ◽  
Michael E. J. Masson ◽  
Glen E. Bodner
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document