scholarly journals PD-10 Improvement of Asia-Pacific colorectal screening score combined with fecal immunochemical testing at adjusted thresholds in colorectal cancer screening

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S215
Author(s):  
M. Lu ◽  
H. Chen ◽  
L. Wang ◽  
C. Liu ◽  
Y. Zhang ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3545-3545
Author(s):  
Joseph JY Sung ◽  
Hyun S Kim ◽  
Khean Lee Goh ◽  
Jose Sollano ◽  
Khay Guan Yeoh ◽  
...  

Gut ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 121-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
J J Y Sung ◽  
S C Ng ◽  
F K L Chan ◽  
H M Chiu ◽  
H S Kim ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6078-6078
Author(s):  
Y. Coscas ◽  
D. Serin ◽  
L. Cals ◽  
F. Eisinger ◽  
J. Blay ◽  
...  

6078 Background: The EDIFICE study aimed to allow better understanding of population’s adhesion to the tests available for the 4 most frequent cancers: breast, colorectal, prostate and lung. In 1998 the French National Consensus Conference advocated for mass cancer screening (CS) using Hemoccult II. The departments are divided according to the existence or not of an organized program: this screening was organized in 22 departments (3 “scout” started in 1998, 9 “first wave” in 2003 and 12 “second wave” in 2004). Results are reported hereunder. Methods: This first nationwide observational study was carried out in France from January 18th to February 2nd, 2005 among a representative sample of 1504 subjects aged between 40 and 75 years and a representative sample of 600 general practitioners (GPs). Information about participating subjects included socio-demographic characteristics, attitude towards CS, and about GPs’ medical practice regarding CS. Results: Only 25% of the 970 subjects aged between 50 and 74 years had undergone a colorectal screening test. In the organized departments (OD), the rate of persons who self-report any colorectal cancer screening was 34% vs 20% in unorganized departments (UD) (OR=1.99, CI95% 1.47- 2.69, p<0.001). The rate of recent screening within a range of 2 years was 24% for OD vs 8% for UD (OR=3.35, CI95% 1.91- 5.88, p<0.01). The rate of “fear of the test and/or its results” was higher in OD: 11% versus 6% (OR=1.97, CI95% 1.11–3.49). The rate of GPs who advocated systematically for screening was 40%, 29%, 26% and 13% for scout, first wave, second wave OD and baseline UD respectively. Organization reduced the rate of screening based on colonoscopy alone from 69% persons in UD to 35% in the OD. Conclusions: The main result of this survey comparing data in the same frame of time, in the same country, is that organized programs for colorectal cancer impact of health outcomes. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document