scholarly journals Many countable support iterations of proper forcings preserve Souslin trees

2014 ◽  
Vol 165 (2) ◽  
pp. 573-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heike Mildenberger ◽  
Saharon Shelah
Keyword(s):  
Countable Support ◽  
Souslin Trees

Shelah's work on non-semi-proper iterations, II

2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1865-1883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaz Schlindwein
Keyword(s):  
Closed Subset ◽  
Stationary Subset ◽  
Finite Support ◽  
Countable Support ◽  
Final Model ◽  
Axiom A ◽  
Mahlo Cardinal ◽  
The One ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Special Case

One of the main goals in the theory of forcing iteration is to formulate preservation theorems for not collapsing ω1 which are as general as possible. This line leads from c.c.c. forcings using finite support iterations to Axiom A forcings and proper forcings using countable support iterations to semi-proper forcings using revised countable support iterations, and more recently, in work of Shelah, to yet more general classes of posets. In this paper we concentrate on a special case of the very general iteration theorem of Shelah from [5, chapter XV]. The class of posets handled by this theorem includes all semi-proper posets and also includes, among others, Namba forcing.In [5, chapter XV] Shelah shows that, roughly, revised countable support forcing iterations in which the constituent posets are either semi-proper or Namba forcing or P[W] (the forcing for collapsing a stationary co-stationary subset ofwith countable conditions) do not collapse ℵ1. The iteration must contain sufficiently many cardinal collapses, for example, Levy collapses. The most easily quotable combinatorial application is the consistency (relative to a Mahlo cardinal) of ZFC + CH fails + whenever A ∪ B = ω2 then one of A or B contains an uncountable sequentially closed subset. The iteration Shelah uses to construct this model is built using P[W] to “attack” potential counterexamples, Levy collapses to ensure that the cardinals collapsed by the various P[W]'s are sufficiently well separated, and Cohen forcings to ensure the failure of CH in the final model.In this paper we give details of the iteration theorem, but we do not address the combinatorial applications such as the one quoted above.These theorems from [5, chapter XV] are closely related to earlier work of Shelah [5, chapter XI], which dealt with iterated Namba and P[W] without allowing arbitrary semi-proper forcings to be included in the iteration. By allowing the inclusion of semi-proper forcings, [5, chapter XV] generalizes the conjunction of [5, Theorem XI.3.6] with [5, Conclusion XI.6.7].

Constructible lattices of c-degrees

1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 739-754
Author(s):  
C.P. Farrington
Keyword(s):  
Set Theory ◽  
Regular Cardinal ◽  
Boolean Algebras ◽  
Combinatorial Complexity ◽  
Generic Extension ◽  
Transitive Model ◽  
Perfect Set ◽  
Consistency Results ◽  
Combinatorial Principles ◽  
Souslin Trees

This paper is devoted to the proof of the following theorem.Theorem. Let M be a countable standard transitive model of ZF + V = L, and let ℒ Є M be a wellfounded lattice in M, with top and bottom. Let ∣ℒ∣M = λ, and suppose κ ≥ λ is a regular cardinal in M. Then there is a generic extension N of M such that(i) N and M have the same cardinals, and κN ⊂ M;(ii) the c-degrees of sets of ordinals of N form a pattern isomorphic to ℒ;(iii) if A ⊂ On and A Є N, there is B Є P(κ+)N such that L(A) = L(B).The proof proceeds by forcing with Souslin trees, and relies heavily on techniques developed by Jech. In [5] he uses these techniques to construct simple Boolean algebras in L, and in [6] he uses them to construct a model of set theory whose c-degrees have orderlype 1 + ω*.The proof also draws on ideas of Adamovicz. In [1]–[3] she obtains consistency results concerning the possible patterns of c-degrees of sets of ordinals using perfect set forcing and symmetric models. These methods have the advantage of yielding real degrees, but involve greater combinatorial complexity, in particular the use of ‘sequential representations’ of lattices.The advantage of the approach using Souslin trees is twofold: first, we can make use of ready-made combinatorial principles which hold in L, and secondly, the notion of genericity over a Souslin tree is particularly simple.

scholarly journals Closed maximality principles: implications, separations and combinations

2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 276-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter Fuchs
Keyword(s):  
Equivalence Relation ◽  
Regular Cardinal ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
Souslin Trees ◽  
Maximality Principles ◽  
Automorphism Tower

AbstractI investigate versions of the Maximality Principles for the classes of forcings which are <κ-closed, <κ-directed-closed, or of the form Col(κ, <λ). These principles come in many variants, depending on the parameters which are allowed, I shall write MPΓ (A) for the maximality principle for forcings in Γ, with parameters from A. The main results of this paper are:• The principles have many consequences, such as <κ-closed-generic (Hκ) absoluteness, and imply, e.g., that ◊κ holds. I give an application to the automorphism tower problem, showing that there are Souslin trees which are able to realize any equivalence relation, and hence that there are groups whose automorphism tower is highly sensitive to forcing.• The principles can be separated into a hierarchy which is strict, for many κ.• Some of the principles can be combined, in the sense that they can hold at many different κ simultaneously.The possibilities of combining the principles are limited, though: While it is consistent that MP<κ-closed(Hκ +) holds at all regular κ below any fixed α, the “global” maximality principle, stating that MP<κ-closed (Hκ ∪ {κ} ) holds at every regular κ, is inconsistent. In contrast to this, it is equiconsistent with ZFC that the maximality principle for directed-closed forcings without any parameters holds at every regular cardinal. It is also consistent that every local statement with parameters from Hκ⊦ that's provably <κ-closed-forceably necessary is true, for all regular κ.

scholarly journals Higher Souslin trees and the GCH, revisited

2017 ◽  
Vol 311 ◽  
pp. 510-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assaf Rinot
Keyword(s):  
Souslin Trees

scholarly journals REDUCED POWERS OF SOUSLIN TREES

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
ARI MEIR BRODSKY ◽  
ASSAF RINOT
Keyword(s):  
Prime Number ◽  
Microscopic Approach ◽  
Tree Construction ◽  
Souslin Trees ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Single Power

We study the relationship between a $\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}$-Souslin tree $T$ and its reduced powers $T^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}}/{\mathcal{U}}$.Previous works addressed this problem from the viewpoint of a single power $\unicode[STIX]{x1D703}$, whereas here, tools are developed for controlling different powers simultaneously. As a sample corollary, we obtain the consistency of an $\aleph _{6}$-Souslin tree $T$ and a sequence of uniform ultrafilters $\langle {\mathcal{U}}_{n}\mid n<6\rangle$ such that $T^{\aleph _{n}}/{\mathcal{U}}_{n}$ is $\aleph _{6}$-Aronszajn if and only if $n<6$ is not a prime number.This paper is the first application of the microscopic approach to Souslin-tree construction, recently introduced by the authors. A major component here is devising a method for constructing trees with a prescribed combination of freeness degree and ascent-path characteristics.

On fake Souslin trees

1969 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 571-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. B. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Souslin Trees
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document