Poster 270 The significance of motor evoked potentials in early stroke patients in association with the locations and the volume of brain lesion In Sung Choi (Chonnam National Univ Med Sch & Hosp, Gwangju, Republic of Korea); So Young Lee; Jae Hyung Kim; Sam Gyu Lee, [email protected]

2004 ◽  
Vol 85 (9) ◽  
pp. e52-e53
2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette A. van Kuijk ◽  
Jaco W. Pasman ◽  
Henk T. Hendricks ◽  
Machiel J. Zwarts ◽  
Alexander C. H. Geurts

Objective. The primary aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and early clinical assessment with regard to long-term hand motor recovery in patients with profound hemiplegia after stroke. Methods. The sample was an inception cohort of 39 stroke patients with an acute, ischemic, supratentorial stroke and an initial upper-extremity paralysis admitted to an academic hospital. Hand motor function recovery was defined at 26 weeks poststroke as a Fugl–Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA) hand score >3 points. The following prognostic factors were compared at week 1 and week 3 poststroke: motor functions as assessed by the FMA upper-extremity and lower-extremity subscores, and the presence of an MEP in the abductor digiti minimi and biceps brachii muscle. Results. Both the presence of an abductor digiti minimi–MEP and any motor recovery in the FMA upper-extremity subscore showed a positive predictive value of 1.00 at weeks 1 and 3. The FMA lower-extremity subscore showed the best negative predictive value (0.90; 95% CI 0.78-1.00 at week 1 and 0.95; 95% CI 0.87-1.00 at week 3). Conclusions. In stroke patients with an initial paralysis of the upper extremity the presence or absence of an MEP has similar predictive value compared with early clinical assessment with regard to long-term hand motor recovery.


2020 ◽  
pp. 026921552097294
Author(s):  
Yan Gong ◽  
Xian-Ming Long ◽  
Ying Xu ◽  
Xiu-Ying Cai ◽  
Ming Ye

Objective: To explore effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on motor function and cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Inpatient hospitals. Subjects: Sixty-five participants were randomly assigned to four groups: sham, 1Hz rTMS, cathodic tDCS combined with 1Hz rTMS (tDCS-/rTMS-) and anodic tDCS combined with 1Hz rTMS (tDCS+/rTMS-). Interventions: Four interventions were used, including sham, 1Hz rTMS, and cathodal or anodal tDCS, followed by 1Hz rTMS over contralesional motor cortex, which continued for four weeks. Main measures: Outcome measures were motor function and cortical excitability, evaluated by Fugl-Meyer Assessment, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Barthel Index, resting Motion Threshold, Motor Evoked Potentials and Central Motor Conduction Time, assessed at baseline, four weeks and eight weeks. Results: At four weeks after interventions, Fugl-Meyer Assessment lower limb change score in tDCS+/rTMS- group was significantly larger than other three groups ( P < 0.001). There were significant differences in bilateral Motor Evoked Potentials changes between tDCS+/rTMS- group and sham group ( P < 0.05). At eight weeks, compared to other groups, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ( P = 0.003), Barthel Index ( P = 0.002), FMA lower limb score ( P < 0.001), and bilateral resting Motion Threshold, Motor Evoked Potentials ( P < 0.05) showed significant changes in tDCS+/rTMS- group. Furthermore, Fugl-Meyer Assessment lower limb change score was associated with increased ipsilesional Motor Evoked Potentials ( r = 0.703 P < 0.001) in tDCS+/rTMS- group. Conclusion: 1Hz rTMS combined with anode tDCS stimulation protocol could be a preferable rehabilitative strategy for motor recovery in subacute stroke patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document