Efficiency of a two-phase nozzle for geothermal power generation

2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 229-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vahaji ◽  
A.A. Akbarzadeh ◽  
A. Date ◽  
S.C.P. Cheung ◽  
J.Y. Tu
1993 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 434-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.W. Braun ◽  
H.K. McCluer

Energy ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 501-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Kanoğlu ◽  
Yunus A Çengel

Author(s):  
Xinli Lu ◽  
Arnold Watson ◽  
Joe Deans

Since the first geothermal power plant was built at Larderello (Italy) in 1904, many attempts have been made to improve conversion efficiency. Among innovative technologies, using the Kalina cycle is considered as one of the most effective means of enhancing the thermodynamic performance for both high and low temperature heat source systems. Although initially used as the bottoming cycle of gas turbines and diesel engines, in the late 1980s the Kalina cycle was found to be attractive for geothermal power generation [1, 2, 3]. Different versions (KSC11, KSC12 and KSC13) were designated. Comparison between Kalina cycle and other power cycles can be found in later studies [4, 5, 6]. Here we examine KSC11, because it is specifically designed for geothermal power generation, with lower capital cost [3]. We compare this design with the existing Kawerau ORMAT binary plant in New Zealand. In addition, parametric sensitivity analysis of KCS11 has been carried out for the specific power output and net thermal efficiency by changing the temperatures of both heat source and heat sink for a given ammonia-water composition.


Author(s):  
Nicola Maceli ◽  
Lorenzo Arcangeli ◽  
Andrea Arnone

Abstract The whole energy market, from production plants to end-users, is marked by a strong impulse towards a sustainable use of raw materials and resources, and a reduction of its carbon foot-print. Increasing the split of energy produced with renewables, improving the efficiency of the power plants and reducing the waste of energy appear to be mandatory steps to reach the goal of sustainability. The steam turbines are present in the power generation market with different roles: they are used in fossil, combined cycles, geothermal and concentrated solar plants, but also in waste-to-energy and heat recovery applications. Therefore, they still play a primary role in the energy production market. There are many chances for efficiency improvement in steam turbines, and from a rational point of view, it is important to consider that the LP section contributes to the overall power delivered by the turbine typically by around 40% in industrial power generation. Therefore, the industry is more than ever interested in developing methodologies capable of providing a reliable estimate of the LP stages efficiency, while reducing development costs and time. This paper presents the results obtained using a CFD commercial code with a set of user defined subroutines to model the effects of non-equilibrium steam evolution, droplets nucleation and growth. The numerical results have been compared to well-known test cases available in literature, to show the effects of different modeling hypotheses. The paper then focuses on a test case relevant to a cascade configuration, to show the code capability in terms of bladerow efficiency prediction. Finally, a comprehensive view of the obtained results is done through comparison with existing correlations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document