Effects of two-phase expander on the thermoeconomics of organic double-flash cycles for geothermal power generation

Energy ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 122346
Author(s):  
Dongyu Meng ◽  
Qiang Liu ◽  
Zhongli Ji
2014 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 229-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vahaji ◽  
A.A. Akbarzadeh ◽  
A. Date ◽  
S.C.P. Cheung ◽  
J.Y. Tu

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 1935
Author(s):  
Vitantonio Colucci ◽  
Giampaolo Manfrida ◽  
Barbara Mendecka ◽  
Lorenzo Talluri ◽  
Claudio Zuffi

This study deals with the life cycle assessment (LCA) and an exergo-environmental analysis (EEvA) of the geothermal Power Plant of Hellisheiði (Iceland), a combined heat and power double flash plant, with an installed power of 303.3 MW for electricity and 133 MW for hot water. LCA approach is used to evaluate and analyse the environmental performance at the power plant global level. A more in-depth study is developed, at the power plant components level, through EEvA. The analysis employs existing published data with a realignment of the inventory to the latest data resource and compares the life cycle impacts of three methods (ILCD 2011 Midpoint, ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint-Endpoint, and CML-IA Baseline) for two different scenarios. In scenario 1, any emission abatement system is considered. In scenario 2, re-injection of CO2 and H2S is accounted for. The analysis identifies some major hot spots for the environmental power plant impacts, like acidification, particulate matter formation, ecosystem, and human toxicity, mainly caused by some specific sources. Finally, an exergo-environmental analysis allows indicating the wells as significant contributors of the environmental impact rate associated with the construction, Operation & Maintenance, and end of life stages and the HP condenser as the component with the highest environmental cost rate.


1993 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 434-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.W. Braun ◽  
H.K. McCluer

Energy ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 501-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Kanoğlu ◽  
Yunus A Çengel

Author(s):  
Xinli Lu ◽  
Arnold Watson ◽  
Joe Deans

Since the first geothermal power plant was built at Larderello (Italy) in 1904, many attempts have been made to improve conversion efficiency. Among innovative technologies, using the Kalina cycle is considered as one of the most effective means of enhancing the thermodynamic performance for both high and low temperature heat source systems. Although initially used as the bottoming cycle of gas turbines and diesel engines, in the late 1980s the Kalina cycle was found to be attractive for geothermal power generation [1, 2, 3]. Different versions (KSC11, KSC12 and KSC13) were designated. Comparison between Kalina cycle and other power cycles can be found in later studies [4, 5, 6]. Here we examine KSC11, because it is specifically designed for geothermal power generation, with lower capital cost [3]. We compare this design with the existing Kawerau ORMAT binary plant in New Zealand. In addition, parametric sensitivity analysis of KCS11 has been carried out for the specific power output and net thermal efficiency by changing the temperatures of both heat source and heat sink for a given ammonia-water composition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document