Comparison of spectra and mean glandular dose (MGD) with tube voltage used in digital mammography for simulated, metrological and clinical cases

2021 ◽  
pp. 109862
Author(s):  
Leandro Barbosa da Silveira Gatto ◽  
Delson Braz ◽  
Leonardo Pacifico ◽  
Paulo Cesar Travassos ◽  
Luis Alexandre Goncalves Magalhaes
2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-232
Author(s):  
Anna Wysocka-Rabin ◽  
Magdalena Dobrzyńska ◽  
Katarzyna Pasicz ◽  
Witold Skrzyński ◽  
Ewa Fabiszewska

Abstract Introduction: Advances in digital detector technology and methods of image presentation in digital mammography now offer the possibility of implementing mathematical assessment methods to quantitative image analysis. The aim of this work was to develop new software to simplify the application of the existing international standard for DQE in digital mammography and show in detail how it can be applied, using a Siemens Mammomat Inspiration as a model. Material and methods: Consistent with the IEC standard a 2 mm Al filter at the tube exit and images in DICOM format as raw data, without applying any additional post-processing were used. Measurements were performed for W/Rh anode/filter combination and different tube voltage values (26 ÷ 34 kV) without any anti-scatter grid. To verify new software doses ranging from 20-600 µGy were used in measurements. Exposure (air kerma) was measured using a calibrated radiation meter (Piranha Black 457, RTI Electronics AB, Sweden). MTF was determined, using an edge test device constructed specifically for this work. Results: It has been demonstrated that with the new software the DQE can be measured with the accuracy required by the international standard IEC 62220-1-2. DQE has been presented as a function of spatial frequency for W/Rh anode/filter combination and different tube voltage. Conclusions: New software was used successfully to analyze image quality parameters for the Siemens Mammomat Inspiration detector. This was done on the basis of an internationally accepted methodology. In the next step, mammographs with different detector types can be compared.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 013502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moayyad E. Suleiman ◽  
Patrick C. Brennan ◽  
Mark F. McEntee

Radiology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 271 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie Weigel ◽  
Shoma Berkemeyer ◽  
Ralf Girnus ◽  
Alexander Sommer ◽  
Horst Lenzen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2695-2700
Author(s):  
Mie Ishii ◽  
Mai Nakamura ◽  
Rie Ishii ◽  
Keiichi Shida ◽  
Toshikazu Hatada ◽  
...  

We constructed a mammography database of 807 Japanese women and 2,772 images obtained using five commercial full-field digital mammography (FFDM) devices at four different facilities. Five types of mammography devices fabricated by four manufacturers were used: one with a Mo target (AMULET F), one with Mo and Rh targets (Senographe DS), one with Mo and W targets (AMULET), and two with a W target (MAMMOMAT Fusion and Selenia Dimensions). The purpose of this study was to focus on the mean glandular dose (MGD) in the database and analyze the difference in the MGD of Japanese women radiographed by mammographic devices with different targets or target/filter combinations. Furthermore, we clarify the difference between the displayed and measured MGDs for the three types of mammography devices. The average compression pressure and compression breast thickness of the Japanese women in the mammography in this study were 90.9±21.7 N and 43.3±12.9 mm, respectively. The breast compression pressure slightly varied depending on the facility or FFDM device, while the compression breast thickness decreased with the increase in the compression pressure for all FFDM devices. Differences in breast compression thickness existed depending on the mammography devices. The MGDs of the two types of mammography devices using the W target were smallest (1.335±0.358, 1.218±0.464 mGy). The displayed and measured MGDs of the three types of FFDM devices had a good correlation. However, the difference between the displayed and measured MGDs of the two devices increased with the MGD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document