Allopurinol as Adjunctive Therapy in Intractable Epilepsy: A Double-blind and Placebo-controlled Trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansoureh Togha ◽  
Shahin Akhondzadeh ◽  
Mahmood Motamedi ◽  
Babak Ahmadi ◽  
Soodeh Razeghi
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 606-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Somayeh Arabzadeh ◽  
Niusha Ameli ◽  
Atefeh Zeinoddini ◽  
Farzin Rezaei ◽  
Mehdi Farokhnia ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 217-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Faught

Safety and Efficacy of Two Pregabalin Regimens for Add-on Treatment of Partial Epilepsy Beydoun A, Uthman BM, Kugler AR, Greiner MJ, Knapp LE, Garofalo EA; Pregabalin 1008-009 Study Group Neurology 2005;64:475–480 Objective To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of two pregabalin regimens administered as adjunctive therapy to that of placebo in patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy. Methods A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial was performed. After a prospective 8-week baseline phase, patients were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with placebo or pregabalin, 600 mg/day, administered twice daily (BID) or 3 times daily (TID). Primary efficacy was measured as change in seizure frequency from baseline of either pregabalin regimen compared with placebo. Secondary efficacy comparisons included the proportion of patients experiencing ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (responder rate) and median percentage change from baseline in seizure frequency. Safety/tolerability assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical and neurologic examinations, and clinical laboratory evaluation. Efficacy and safety analyses were performed on the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Results Pregabalin treatment resulted in seizure frequency reductions: 53% for pregabalin TID ( P ≤ 0.0001) and 44% for pregabalin BID ( P ≤ 0.0001) compared with a 1% increase for placebo. Responder rates were 49% for pregabalin TID and 43% for pregabalin BID compared with 9% for placebo ( P ≤ 0.001). Both pregabalin regimens were similar in efficacy and tolerability. The most common AEs were dizziness, somnolence, and ataxia. Conclusions Pregabalin administered at 600 mg/day is safe, generally well tolerated, and efficacious as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of patients with partial seizures, with or without secondary generalizations. This dose can be administered on a twice-daily or 3-times-daily schedule with similar efficacy and tolerability results.


Author(s):  
Ramesh L. Sahjpaul ◽  
Jeff Mahon ◽  
Samuel Wiebe

Background:Invasive monitoring with subdural electrodes (SDE) for investigation of medically intractable epilepsy may be associated with undesirable immediate postoperative morbidity such as headache, nausea, vomiting, fever, and meningism. We undertook to evaluate the potential beneficial role of perioperative dexamethasone in reducing these symptoms.Methods:In a double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial 30 patients undergoing SDE insertion were randomized to receive either placebo or a course of dexamethasone beginning one hour prior to surgery and tapering to discontinue over 72 hours postoperatively. Pain, pain relief, nausea, nausea relief, temperature, and meningism were assessed regularly in the postoperative period, and analgesic, antipyretic, and antiemetic drug requirements were tabulated.Results:One patient was withdrawn from the dexamethasone group due to lack of data. With regards to postoperative pain, the direction of benefit favoured dexamethasone but a significant treatment by time interaction prevented further analysis of treatment effect. The dexamethasone group did have significantly lower temperatures and higher nausea relief scores. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regards to pain relief, nausea, and meningism scores. The beneficial effects of dexamethasone were delayed in onset, of limited duration, and not uniform over the observation period.Conclusion:Dexamethasone appears to have a role in reducing immediate morbidity following SDE insertion but its effect is not uniform in the postoperative period; it appears to be delayed in onset, and of limited duration. Further study is necessary to determine the ideal dosing schedule.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nakisa Mohammadpour ◽  
Shima Jazayeri ◽  
Mehdi Tehrani-Doost ◽  
Mahmoud Djalali ◽  
Mostafa Hosseini ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 494-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Yaser Mousavi ◽  
Rasoul Khezri ◽  
Mohammad-Ali Karkhaneh-Yousefi ◽  
Payam Mohammadinejad ◽  
Faezeh Gholamian ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Gilda Kianimehr ◽  
Farzad Fatehi ◽  
Sara Hashempoor ◽  
Mohammad-Reza Khodaei-Ardakani ◽  
Farzin Rezaei ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 208 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lakshmi N. Yatham ◽  
Eduard Vieta ◽  
Guy M. Goodwin ◽  
Michel Bourin ◽  
Christian de Bodinat ◽  
...  

BackgroundAdjunctive antidepressant therapy is commonly used to treat acute bipolar depression but few studies have examined this strategy.AimsTo examine the efficacy of agomelatine v. placebo as adjuncts to lithium or valproate in bipolar depression.MethodPatients who were currently depressed despite taking lithium or valproate for at least 6 weeks were randomised to treatment with agomelatine (n = 172) or placebo (n = 172) for 8 weeks of acute therapy and 44 weeks of continuation therapy (trial registration: ISRCTN28588282).ResultsNo significant differences in improvement of depressive symptoms were observed between the two groups either at 8 weeks or 52 weeks on the primary efficacy measure of change in Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale scores from baseline to end-point. Adverse events including switches into mania/hypomania were low and similar in both groups.ConclusionsAgomelatine adjunctive therapy was not superior to placebo adjunctive therapy for acute bipolar depression.


2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 441 ◽  
Author(s):  
SharleneHelene H. Chua ◽  
GiselleMarie S. Tioleco ◽  
CarmelaAugusta F. Dayrit ◽  
WinloveP Mojica ◽  
BelenL Dofitas ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atefeh Zeinoddini ◽  
Maryam Sorayani ◽  
Elmira Hassanzadeh ◽  
Mohammad Arbabi ◽  
Mehdi Farokhnia ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document