scholarly journals Letter to Editor: “Does Insert Type Affect Clinical and Functional Outcome in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial With 5-Year Follow-Up”

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1614-1615
Author(s):  
Anil Mehtani ◽  
Jatin Prakash
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andri M. T. Lubis ◽  
Rangga B. V. Rawung ◽  
Aida R. Tantri

Acute pain is the most common early complication after total knee arthroplasty causing delayed mobilization and increased demands of morphine, leading to higher operative cost. Several studies have assessed the effectiveness, side-effects, and ease of use of various analgesics. Preemptive analgesia with combined celecoxib and pregabalin has been reported to yield positive outcomes. In this randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial, 30 subjects underwent surgery for total knee arthroplasty using 15-20mg bupivacaine 5% epidural anesthesia. All subjects were divided into three groups. Group 1 was given celecoxib 400mg and pregabalin 150mg 1 hour before the operation, Group 2 was given celecoxib 200mg and pregabalin 75mg twice daily starting from 3 days before the operation, and Group 3 was given a placebo. The outcome was measured with Visual Analog Scale, knee range of motion, and postoperative mobilization. There was a significant difference in postoperative morphine usage between the groups that were administered with preemptive analgesia and the placebo group, but no significant difference was found between Group 1 and Group 2 that were given preemptive analgesia at different doses. ROM and postoperative mobilization were not significantly different among the three groups. Two patients in the first group, one patient in the second group, and one patient in the third group developed nausea. Preemptive analgesia is proven to reduce postoperative usage of morphine independent of the dosage. We recommend the use of combined celecoxib and pregabalin as preemptive analgesia after the total knee arthroplasty procedure. This trial is registered with NCT03523832 (ClinicalTrials.gov).


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 567-570
Author(s):  
Pradeep P ◽  
Thiyagarajan U ◽  
Senthil Loganathan ◽  
Raghavendar B

Total knee arthroplasty is becoming a more frequently performed orthopedics surgery these days aimed mainly to improve the functional outcome and correct deformity in patients suffering from arthritis of the knee joint. To evaluate the results, we conducted a prospective study from March 2017 to December 2019. The pain was evaluated every 4th hourly during the first 24 hours and thereon every 6th hourly till 5th POD. The 2MWT was administered during the 2nd POD and 6MWT was administered during the 6 weeks follow up to check for the muscle endurance when walking. In our study, we had 22 patients who were between 55-60 years, 21 patients between 61-70 years and 17 patients between 71-80 years. Based on analysis of our results, the mean VAS pain score was 4 on POD 0 and VAS pain score was 3 on Post-operative day 1 and 2. The 2 MWT administered on the 2nd POD showed that 35 patients (58.3%) were able to walk 30 meters. The rest of the 25 patients (42%) were not able to do the 2MWT due to various reasons like pain (15) and dizziness (10). The 6MWT administered at 6 weeks showed that all the patients were able to walk an average of 480 meters. Periarticular cocktail of analgesics used in Total knee arthroplasty was associated with a favorable improvement in walking capacity, pain management in the immediate post-operative period and improved knee function. Periarticular administration of a cocktail of analgesics helped to improve the patient's ambulatory status.


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 2222-2227
Author(s):  
George Viscopoleanu ◽  
Bogdan Sendrea ◽  
Emil Haritinian

The objectives of the current study were to identify the causes leading to revision knee arthroplasty, analyse implant choices and assess the short-term outcome. The current study is a retrospective on including a group of 33 patients operated between Jan 2013-Dec 2016 in a single institution. Data was collected from the Romanian National Arthroplasty Register. The cause for revision surgery was noted, as well as the type of implant used during the surgical procedure. The bony defect was classified according to the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) Classification and the reconstruction method was analysed. Functional outcome was assessed using Oxford Knee Score preoperatively and at one year follow-up. Infection was the cause of failure in 18 cases, aseptic loosening in 11 cases, malposition of implants in 2 cases, instability in 1 case and periprosthetic fracture in 1 case. Revision implants were chosen based on joint stability and degree bone loss. The preferred implant was a condylar constrained knee type (20 cases), followed by a rotating hinge type (5 cases). An unconstrained implant was used in 2 cases. Six infected cases required an arthrodesis of the knee. Based on the AORI Classification, there were 10 type III defects, 14 type IIB, 8 type IIA and only one type I defect. Metal augments were preferred for reconstruction of bone defects. Bone graft was used in 8 cases. The mean Oxford Knee Score was 15 pre-op (12-20) and 38 post-op (32-45). Implant survival at final follow-up was 100%. The most common cause of failure of primary total knee arthroplasty is prosthetic joint infection. Bone defects can be addressed using metal augments or bone allograft. Postoperative functional outcome is improved irrespective of the type of implant used.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document