Dissociation between coronary artery calcium and cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic patients in a risk assessment clinic

2018 ◽  
Vol 275 ◽  
pp. e40
Author(s):  
C. Vargas garcía ◽  
J. Pang ◽  
Gf. Watts ◽  
W. Bishop
Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabela M Bensenor ◽  
Alessandra C Goulart ◽  
Itamar S Santos ◽  
Dora Chor ◽  
Alexandre C Pereira ◽  
...  

Introduction: Few studies evaluated the relationship between a favorable lifestyle a healthy profile of cardiovascular risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis measured by Coronary Artery Calcium Score (CAC). Hypothesis: to identify the association between lifestyle profile and CAC among mid-elderly men and women. Methods: We included 4058 participants of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Health aged 35-74 years who underwent CAC measurement. The 2010 Task Force of the American Heart Association cut-offs were used to define the ideal profile and included smoking, physical activity, diet, blood pressure, glucose/cholesterol levels, and body-mass index. Only 21 participants had at least 6 ideal metrics. Participants were categorized according the number of ideal risk factors (IRF): 0-1 (n=1152, 28.4%), 2 (n=1234, 30.4%), 3-4 (n=1489, 36.7%), or 5-7 (n=183, 4.5%). (Figure 1). Results: Compared to individuals with 0-1 IRF, the odds ratio (OR) of participants with 2 IRF presenting with CAC of 0 (compared to >0), <100 (compared to ≥100), and <400 (compared to ≥400) was 0.65 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-0.79), 0.59 (95%CI: 0.45-0.77), and 0.61 (95%CI: 0.39-0.94), respectively. Similarly, the ORs of CACs of 0, <100, and <400 in individuals with 3-4 IRF were 0.54 (95%CI: 0.44-0.66), 0.42 (95%CI: 0.31-0.57), and 0.56 (95%CI: 0.34-0.92), respectively. The ORs of CACs of 0, <100, and <400 in individuals with 5-7 IRF were 0.33 (95%CI: 018-0.58), 0.17 (95%CI: 0.04-0.72), and zero, respectively. Conclusion: Subjects with more IRF had lower CAC compared to subjects with lower ICH metrics, but CAC >0 was found even in these individuals.


Circulation ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 128 (10) ◽  
pp. 1076-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Pletcher ◽  
Christopher T. Sibley ◽  
Michael Pignone ◽  
Eric Vittinghoff ◽  
Philip Greenland

Circulation ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 103 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 1350-1350
Author(s):  
Ann Mertens ◽  
Peter P Verhamme ◽  
Raymond Verhaeghe ◽  
Erik Muls ◽  
Desire Collen ◽  
...  

0032 BACKGROUND: Coronary artery disease is associated with an increase in circulating oxidized (Ox)LDL (Circulation 1998; 98:1487-1494). OBJECTIVES: 1) To determine the usefulness of OxLDL for identifying cardiovascular disease patients and 2) to study the relation of OxLDL with cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: 1) To determine the diagnostic value of OxLDL 308 subjects were studied: 178 patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease and 130 age-matched subjects without cardiovascular disease (controls) confirmed by B mode ultrasonography of their carotid arteries. 2) Additional 307 patients without cardiovascular disease were studied to determine the relation of OxLDL with cardiovascular risk factors. Levels of OxLDL were directly measured in plasma using a mAb-4E6 based competition ELISA. RESULTS: Compared with controls, patients had 2.3-fold higher levels of circulating OxLDL. At a cutoff value of 2.30 mg/dL, the sensitivity of OxLDL for cardiovascular disease was 73% with a specificity of 90%. The Global Risk Assessment Score (GRAS) was calculated using age, total and HDL cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, diabetes mellitus and smoking. GRAS was 8.65±3.41 for patients versus 6.09±5.10 (p≤0.001) for controls. Compared with subjects with low OxLDL (≤2.30 mg/dL) and low GRAS (≤12), risk of having cardiovascular disease was 3.2 times higher for subjects with low OxLDL and high GRAS, 6.4 times higher for subjects with high OxLDL and low GRAS and 27 times higher for subjects with both high OxLDL and high GRAS. Among patients without cardiovascular disease, stepwise multivariate analysis showed that Body Mass Index (p<0.001), LDL cholesterol (p<0.001), diabetes type 2 (p=0.003), triglycerides (p=0.017) and smoking (p=0.046) were the strongest predictors of OxLDL. Conclusion: Circulating OxLDL is a sensitive marker of cardiovascular disease. Circulating oxidized LDL correlates with obesity, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes and smoking. Addition of OxLDL to the established risk factors may improve cardiovascular risk prediction. Inclusion of OxLDL in prospective studies of risk factors of cardiovascular disease seems to be warranted.


Diabetes ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 849-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Mazzone ◽  
P. M. Meyer ◽  
G. T. Kondos ◽  
M. H. Davidson ◽  
S. B. Feinstein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document