Risk of cataract surgery in subjects with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in prolonged treatment with statins

2020 ◽  
Vol 315 ◽  
pp. e81
Author(s):  
V. Marco Benedí ◽  
M. Laclaustra ◽  
J.M. Casado-Dominguez ◽  
R. Villa Pobo ◽  
R. Mateo-Gallego ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. 3494
Author(s):  
Victoria Marco-Benedí ◽  
Martín Laclaustra ◽  
Rosa M. Sánchez-Hernández ◽  
Emilio Ortega-Martínez de Victoria ◽  
Juan Pedro-Botet ◽  
...  

Background: Cataracts are the main cause of blindness and represent one fifth of visual problems worldwide. It is still unknown whether prolonged statin treatment favors the development of cataracts. We aimed to ascertain the prevalence of cataract surgery in elderly subjects with genetically diagnosed heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) receiving statin treatment for ≥5 years, and compare this with controls. Methods: This is an observational, multicenter, case–control study from five lipid clinics in Spain. We collected data with the following inclusion criteria: age ≥65 years, LDL cholesterol levels ≥220 mg/dL without lipid-lowering drugs, a pathogenic mutation in a candidate gene for HeFH (LDLR, APOB, or PCSK9) and statin treatment for ≥5 years. Controls were selected from relatives of HeFH patients without hypercholesterolemia. Linear and logistic regressions based on generalized linear models and generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used. Cataract surgery was used as a proxy for cataract development. Results: We analyzed 205 subjects, 112 HeFH, and 93 controls, with a mean age of 71.8 (6.5) and 70.0 (7.3) years, respectively. HeFH subjects presented no difference in clinical characteristics, including smoking, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared with controls. The mean duration of lipid-lowering treatment in HeFH was 22.5 (8.7) years. Cataract surgery prevalence was not significantly different between cases and controls. The presence of cataracts was associated neither with LDLc nor with the length of the statin therapy. Conclusion: In the present study, HeFH was not a risk factor for cataract surgery and prolonged statin treatment did not favor it either. These findings suggest that statin treatment is not related with cataracts.


2019 ◽  
Vol 287 ◽  
pp. e182
Author(s):  
V. Marco-Benedí ◽  
J.M. Casado-Dominguez ◽  
R. Villa Pobo ◽  
R. Mateo-Gallego ◽  
S. Perez Calahorra ◽  
...  

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 235
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Roy ◽  
Anykim Boucher ◽  
Patrick Couture ◽  
Jean-Philippe Drouin-Chartier

Background: Conclusive data on the effectiveness of dietary interventions in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) management are unavailable. Whether this is due to a true lack of effects or biases in intervention designs remains unsettled. We systematically assessed the impact on LDL-C of published dietary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted among individuals with HeFH in relation to their design and risk of bias. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase in November 2020 to identify RCTs that assessed the impact of: (1) food-based interventions; (2) dietary counseling interventions; or (3) dietary supplements on LDL-C in individuals with HeFH. We evaluated the risk of bias of each study using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 method. Results: A total of 19 RCTs comprising 837 individuals with HeFH were included. Of those, five were food-based interventions, three were dietary counseling interventions and 12 were dietary supplement-based interventions (omega-3, n = 3; phytosterols, n = 7; guar gum, n = 1; policosanol, n = 1). One study qualified both as a food-based intervention and as a dietary supplement intervention due to its factorial design. A significant reduction in LDL-C levels was reported in 10 RCTs, including eight dietary supplement interventions (phytosterols, n = 6, omega-3, n = 1; guar gum, n = 1), one food-based intervention and one dietary counseling intervention. A total of 13 studies were judged to have some methodological biases in a way that substantially lowers confidence in the results. Studies at low risk of biases were more likely to report significant reductions in LDL-C concentrations, compared with studies at risk of bias (chi-square statistic: 5.49; p = 0.02). Conclusion: This systemic review shows that the apparent lack of effectiveness of diet manipulation in modulating plasma levels of LDL-C among individuals with HeFH is likely due to biases in study designs, rather than a true lack of effects. The likelihood of reporting significant reductions in LDL-C was associated with the concurrent risk of bias.


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 1411
Author(s):  
Khurram Nasir ◽  
Reed Mszar ◽  
Miguel Cainzos-Achirica ◽  
Gowtham Grandhi ◽  
Rodrigo Alonso Karlezi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document