A Meta-Analysis of the Association between the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI) and Suicidality

2020 ◽  
pp. 101539
Author(s):  
David Detullio ◽  
Danielle H. Millen ◽  
Tom D. Kennedy
2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 1897-1905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Liang ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Guoqiang Rui

By retrieving literature published from 2005 to 2015 from Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, Vip, PubMed, and Web of Science, we filtered out studies using the Children’s Depression Inventory only and compared left-behind children and non-left-behind children. The methodological quality of the papers was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Finally, we included six studies to carry out a meta-analysis. The results showed that the Children’s Depression Inventory scores of left-behind children are significantly higher than those of non-left-behind children (standardized mean difference: −0.233, 95% confidence interval: −0.036 to −0.430, p < 0.05).


2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 637-637
Author(s):  
C. Huang ◽  
N. Dong

This study used meta-analysis to comprehensively examine the factor analysis of the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI). Twenty-five studies (N = 18,897) consisting of 36 independent samples were identified. Generally, the CDI comprises five factors: Self-Depreciation, Somatic Concerns, Externalizing, Lack of Personal and Social Interest, and Dysphoric Mood. When reviewing individual items, the results of this meta-analysis suggest that self-depreciation had salient loadings on factors similar to Self-Depreciation, Externalizing, and Somatic Concerns. The variability in this item makes self-depreciation a poor marker for symptoms of Self-Depreciation, Externalizing, and Somatic Concerns, and hence suggests that it should be revised or excluded in future revisions of the CDI. The equivalence of factor structure is a prerequisite to comparing mean scores across groups. Hence, the factor structure of the CDI was examined for subgroups of studies. The 5-factor structure of the CDI was generally appropriate except in studies assessing depression of at-risk/clinical participants and participants using non-English versions of the CDI. For studies assessing depression among at-risk/clinical participants and participants using non-English versions of the CDI, factors similar to Self-Depreciation, Lack of Personal and Social Interest, and Externalizing were identified. The at-risk/clinical samples had an independent factor of Depressive Mood and Loneliness, while studies using non-English versions of the CDI had an independent factor of Sadness and Somatic Notably, the factor of Somatic Concerns was not identified in at-risk/clinical samples and items of sleep disturbance, fatigue, and reduced appetite had no salient loadings.


1987 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. Finch Jr. ◽  
Conway F. Saylor ◽  
Garry L. Edwards ◽  
Julia A. McIntosh

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-227
Author(s):  
Diego Grasel Barbosa ◽  
Rubian Diego Andrade ◽  
Clarissa Stefani Teixeira ◽  
Manoel Gomes Filho Neto ◽  
Érico Pereira Gomes Felden

Resumo Objetivo Identificar os principais indicadores de depressão de amostra de adolescentes em vulnerabilidade social e associar com variáveis sociodemográficas e comportamentais. Método: A amostra foi composta por 135 adolescentes em vulnerabilidade social de Florianópolis, Santa Catarina. Indicadores de depressão foram investigados por meio do Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). Para comparação entre os sexos, utilizou-se o teste U de Mann-Whitney. Com o objetivo de identificar os fatores de agrupamento entre os sintomas depressivos, recorreu-se à análise fatorial com rotação ortogonal varimax normalized. Além disso, a Regressão de Poisson foi utilizada no sentido de identificar as razões de prevalências, tendo como variável desfecho o tercil superior da pontuação do CDI. Resultados: Os indicadores “perda ou ganho de peso”, “baixa autoestima” e “fadiga” apresentaram maior poder explicativo dos escores do CDI. Os meninos atingiram maior pontuação média (24,9 pontos). Os índices do CDI foram altos independentemente de questões sociodemográficas, como etnia, e comportamentais, tempo em frente à televisão e ao computador ou videogame. Conclusão: Foram observadas altas prevalências de sintomatologia depressiva nos adolescentes em situação de vulnerabilidade social, com destaque para os meninos, que possuíram 2,24 vezes maior probabilidade de apresentar pontuação elevada no CDI em comparação às meninas.


1998 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Edward Craighead ◽  
Mervin R. Smucker ◽  
Linda Wilcoxon Craighead ◽  
Stephen S. Ilardi

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 1317-1332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy J. Taylor ◽  
Kathryn E. Grant ◽  
Kelly Amrhein ◽  
Jocelyn Smith Carter ◽  
Farahnaz Farahmand ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document