Open surgical treatment of acute spontaneous isolated abdominal aortic dissection

Author(s):  
Petar Zlatanovic ◽  
Marko Dragas ◽  
Slobodan Cvetkovic ◽  
Andreja Dimic ◽  
Aleksandar Mitrovic ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 556.e1-556.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa Khalife ◽  
Jean-Marc Alsac ◽  
Marc Lambert ◽  
Emmanuel Messas ◽  
Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 1424-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian-qian Zhu ◽  
Dong-lin Li ◽  
Ming-chun Lai ◽  
Xu-dong Chen ◽  
Wei Jin ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20150332
Author(s):  
John Colville ◽  
Manmohan Madan ◽  
Khalid Bashaeb ◽  
Riza Ibrahim ◽  
Abysinia Sibanda

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 224
Author(s):  
Rui Machado ◽  
Duarte Rego ◽  
Luís Loureiro ◽  
Rui Almeida

Isolated acute abdominal aortic dissection is a relatively rare event. Its natural history is not fully understood and its optimal treatment is not established. Open surgery represents the most described treatment but endovascular intervention has had increasing application. Isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection  is even less described in the literature. We describe three patients with isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection who underwent endovascular treatment in our institution. Mean age at presentation was 82 years. Indication for surgical intervention was aneurismal degeneration. Mean aortic diameter at presentation was 46.7 mm. There was no perioperative mortality or reinterventions. Mean follow-up was 5.3 years (2-12 years). Late reintervention was needed in one patient, eight years after initial surgery, due to type 1 endoleak. According to our experience, endovascular intervention represents an effective and durable treatment option in isolated chronic abdominal aortic dissection. However, long-term follow-up is mandatory. Furthermore, larger studies are still needed to understand this disease and its adequate treatment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (7) ◽  
pp. 770-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yifei Pei ◽  
Qingsheng Lu ◽  
Junmin Bao ◽  
Zhiqing Zhao ◽  
Zaiping Jing

We present two cases of infrarenal abdominal aortic dissection (IAAD) that were treated by endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The EVAR procedure was successful, although one patient developed a proximal Type I endoleak several months after the procedure; both patients remain symptom-free more than 24 months after surgery. A literature search revealed that EVAR has been performed in only 14 cases of IAAD. Based on these 14 cases, we believe EVAR is feasible and effective for the treatment of IAAD. Moreover, this treatment strategy represents a reasonable alternative to open surgery, especially in cases of complicated juxtarenal abdominal aortic dissection.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (feb14 2) ◽  
pp. bcr2013203097-bcr2013203097 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. S. Tang ◽  
C. S. Chong ◽  
S. Narayanan

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. e67-e68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos R. Cámara-Lemarroy ◽  
José R. Azpiri-López ◽  
Luis A. Vázquez-Díaz ◽  
Dionicio A. Galarza-Delgado

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document