scholarly journals Meta-analysis of tree diversity effects on the abundance, diversity and activity of herbivores' enemies

Author(s):  
Stemmelen Alex ◽  
Jactel Hervé ◽  
Brockerhoff G Eckehard ◽  
Castagneyrol Bastien
Authorea ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liting Zheng ◽  
Han Y H Chen ◽  
Shekhar Biswas ◽  
Difeng Bao ◽  
Xiaochen Fang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Stemmelen ◽  
Hervé Jactel ◽  
Eckehard Brockerhoff ◽  
Bastien Castagneyrol

The natural enemies hypothesis predicts that the abundance and diversity of antagonists such as predators and parasitoids of herbivores increases with the diversity of plants, which can lead to more effective top-down control of insect herbivores. However, although the hypothesis has received large support in agricultural systems, fewer studies have been conducted in forest ecosystems and a comprehensive synthesis of previous research is still lacking. We conducted a meta-analysis of 65 publications comparing the diversity, abundance or activity of various groups of natural enemies (including birds, bats, spiders and insect parasitoids) in pure vs. mixed forest stands. We tested the effects of forest biome, natural enemy taxon and type of study (managed vs experimental forest). We found a significant positive effect of forest tree diversity on natural enemy abundance and diversity but not on their activity. The effect of tree diversity on natural enemies was stronger towards lower latitudes but was not contingent on the natural enemy taxon. Overall, our study contributes substantially toward a better understanding of the natural enemies hypothesis in forest systems and provides new insights about the mechanisms involved. Furthermore, we outline potential avenues for strengthening forest resistance to the growing threat of herbivorous insects.


2020 ◽  
Vol 89 (8) ◽  
pp. 1775-1787
Author(s):  
Yanely May‐Uc ◽  
Colleen S. Nell ◽  
Víctor Parra‐Tabla ◽  
Jorge Navarro ◽  
Luis Abdala‐Roberts

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime Madrigal-Gonzalez ◽  

<p>Increasing evidence now exists for a tight connection between tree diversity and carbon storage capacity. As part of the Paris Agreement (COP21), forests play a critical and prominent role to reach the ambitious goal of net-zero emissions in the second half of this century. Besides reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (also known as REDD), maintaining and enriching tree assemblages could thus help mitigating climate change via increased abundance and more efficient resource use.</p><p>However, recent evidence questions this widespread idea of positive diversity effects on forest carbon storage. Specifically, tree diversity may not always be a causal mechanism but rather a consequence of tree abundance and productivity (following the ‘more individuals hypothesis’). To test these contrasting hypotheses, this contribution analyses the most plausible causal pathways and their stability along global climatic gradients in the diversity-abundance relationship across the World’s main forest biomes, using a dataset comprising more than 2,500 forest plots and 83,800 trees sampled in pristine forest landscapes in all continents (except Antarctica).</p><p>We demonstrate that causal relations can be reconciled along global climate gradients, with diversity effects prevailing in the most productive environments, and abundance effects becoming dominant towards the most limiting conditions. These findings have major implications on climate change mitigation strategies aimed at carbon sequestration: we find that future nature-based mitigation solutions focused on fostering biodiversity will only be cost-effective in productive forest landscapes. In less productive environments, by contrast, mitigation measures should promote the abundance of locally adapted functional strategies. Conservation of species diversity in equatorial and tropical areas is thus a priority, not only to preserve the inherent value of biodiversity but also to achieve the global goals on atmospheric decarbonization. In less productive lands on Earth, the conservation of abundance through productivity should be posed, next to diversity, as a major element in environmental policies and land management.</p><p> </p>


2019 ◽  
Vol 433 ◽  
pp. 287-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastien Castagneyrol ◽  
Brice Giffard ◽  
Elena Valdés-Correcher ◽  
Arndt Hampe

Author(s):  
Stefan Trogisch ◽  
Xiaojuan Liu ◽  
Gemma Rutten ◽  
Helge Bruelheide

2019 ◽  
Vol 286 (1898) ◽  
pp. 20182399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Fornoff ◽  
Alexandra-Maria Klein ◽  
Nico Blüthgen ◽  
Michael Staab

Multi-trophic interactions maintain critical ecosystem functions. Biodiversity is declining globally, while responses of trophic interactions to biodiversity change are largely unclear. Thus, studying responses of multi-trophic interaction robustness to biodiversity change is crucial for understanding ecosystem functioning and persistence. We investigate plant–Hemiptera (antagonism) and Hemiptera–ant (mutualism) interaction networks in response to experimental manipulation of tree diversity. We show increased diversity at both higher trophic levels (Hemiptera and ants) and increased robustness through redundancy of lower level species of multi-trophic interactions when tree diversity increased. Hemiptera and ant diversity increased with tree diversity through non-additive diversity effects. Network analyses identified that tree diversity also increased the number of tree and Hemiptera species used by Hemiptera and ant species, and decreased the specialization on lower trophic level species in both mutualistic and antagonist interactions. Our results demonstrate that bottom-up effects of tree diversity ascend through trophic levels regardless of interaction type. Thus, local tree diversity is a key driver of multi-trophic community diversity and interaction robustness in forests.


eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Kou ◽  
Lei Jiang ◽  
Stephan Hättenschwiler ◽  
Miaomiao Zhang ◽  
Shuli Niu ◽  
...  

Plant species diversity affects carbon and nutrient cycling during litter decomposition, yet the generality of the direction of this effect and its magnitude remains uncertain. With a meta-analysis including 65 field studies across the Earth’s major forest ecosystems, we show here that decomposition was faster when litter was composed of more than one species. These positive biodiversity effects were mostly driven by temperate forests but were more variable in other forests. Litter mixture effects emerged most strongly in early decomposition stages and were related to divergence in litter quality. Litter diversity also accelerated nitrogen, but not phosphorus release, potentially indicating a decoupling of nitrogen and phosphorus cycling and perhaps a shift in ecosystem nutrient limitation with changing biodiversity. Our findings demonstrate the importance of litter diversity effects for carbon and nutrient dynamics during decomposition, and show how these effects vary with litter traits, decomposer complexity and forest characteristics.


2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 724-735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evalyne W. Muiruri ◽  
Harriet T. Milligan ◽  
Simon Morath ◽  
Julia Koricheva

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document