Instability of syllable repetition in Parkinson's disease—Impairment of automated speech performance?

Basal Ganglia ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Skodda ◽  
Julia Lorenz ◽  
Uwe Schlegel
1989 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 610-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce E. Murdoch ◽  
Helen J. Chenery ◽  
Simon Bowler ◽  
John C. L. Ingram

The respiratory abilities of a group of 19 speech-disordered subjects with idiopathic Parkinson's disease were assessed using both spirometric and kinematic techniques and compared to those of a group of 19 nonneurologically impaired controls matched for age and sex. Results of the spirometric assessment showed that only a minority of the Parkinson's subjects had lung volumes and capacities outside normal limits. Consequently in the majority of eases, the speech disorder could not be related to any abnormality in lung function determined spirometrically. Chest wall dynamics during both conversation and reading were essentially normal in all cases. Approximately half of the Parkinson's subjects, however, exhibited irregularities in their chest wall movements while performing vowel prolongation and syllable repetition tasks. The same irregularities were not present in the chest wall movements exhibited by the control subjects, suggesting that their presence was in some way related to the Parkinson's disease. Results are discussed in terms of the effects of Parkinson's disease on neuromuscular function.


2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 316-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Schmitz-Hübsch ◽  
Oleksandr Eckert ◽  
Uwe Schlegel ◽  
Thomas Klockgether ◽  
Sabine Skodda

Basal Ganglia ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Skodda ◽  
Uwe Schlegel ◽  
Martin Südmeyer ◽  
Alfons Schnitzler ◽  
Lars Wojtecki

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika D. Andreetta ◽  
Scott G. Adams ◽  
Allyson D. Dykstra ◽  
Mandar Jog

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of selected speech amplification devices in individuals with hypophonia and idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD). Method This study compared the effectiveness of seven devices (ADDvox, BoomVox, ChatterVox, Oticon Amigo, SoniVox, Spokeman, and Voicette) to unamplified speech for 11 participants with PD during conversation in 65-dB SPL multitalker noise, using experience ratings collected from participant questionnaires and speech performance measures (i.e., speech-to-noise ratio [SNR], speech intensity, and intelligibility) obtained from audio recordings. Results Compared with unamplified speech, device use increased SNR by 1.07–4.73 dB SPL and speech intensity by 1.1–5.1 dB SPL, and it significantly increased transcribed intelligibility from 13.8% to 58.9%. In addition, the type of device used significantly affected speech performance measures (e.g., BoomVox was significantly higher than most of the other devices for SNR, speech intensity, and intelligibility). However, experience ratings did not always correspond to performance measures. Conclusions This study found preliminary evidence of improved speech performance with device use for individuals with PD. A tentative hierarchy is suggested for device recommendations. Future research is needed to determine which measures will predict long-term device acceptance in PD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document