Neuromagnetic imaging reveals timing of volitional and anticipatory motor control in bimanual load lifting

2013 ◽  
Vol 247 ◽  
pp. 182-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommy H.B. Ng ◽  
Paul F. Sowman ◽  
Jon Brock ◽  
Blake W. Johnson
2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 828-840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettina Pollok ◽  
Joachim Gross ◽  
Daniel Kamp ◽  
Alfons Schnitzler

The posterior parietal cortex and the cerebellum are assumed to contribute to anticipatory motor control. Thus, it is reasonable that these areas act as a functional unit. To identify a neural signature of anticipatory motor control, 11 healthy volunteers performed a bimanual finger-tapping task with respect to isochronous (i.e., regular) and randomized (i.e., irregular) auditory pacing. Neuromagnetic activity was recorded using a 122-channel whole-head neuromagnetometer. Functional interaction between spatially distributed brain areas was determined by measures of tap-related phase synchronization. Assuming that (i) the cerebellum predicts sensory events by an internal model and (ii) the PPC maintains this prediction, we hypothesized that functional interaction between both structures varies depending on the predictability of the pacing signal. During isochronous pacing, functional connectivity within a cerebello-diencephalic-parietal network before tap onset was evident, suggesting anticipatory motor control. During randomized pacing, however, functional connectivity after tap onset was increased within a parietal-cerebellar loop, suggesting mismatch detection and update of the internal model. Data of the present study imply that anticipatory motor control is implemented in a network-like manner. Our data agree well with the hypothesis that functional connectivity in a cerebello-diencephalic-parietal loop might be crucial for anticipatory motor control, whereas parietal-cerebellar interaction might be critical for feedback processing.


2018 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 45-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan C. Kirkland ◽  
Alice Chen ◽  
Matthew B. Downer ◽  
Brett J. Holloway ◽  
Elizabeth M. Wallack ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 800-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Krause ◽  
Juliane Weber ◽  
Bettina Pollok

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-36
Author(s):  
Erin M. Wilson ◽  
Ignatius S. B. Nip

Abstract Although certain speech development milestones are readily observable, the developmental course of speech motor control is largely unknown. However, recent advances in facial motion tracking systems have been used to investigate articulator movements in children and the findings from these studies are being used to further our understanding of the physiologic basis of typical and disordered speech development. Physiologic work has revealed that the emergence of speech is highly dependent on the lack of flexibility in the early oromotor system. It also has been determined that the progression of speech motor development is non-linear, a finding that has motivated researchers to investigate how variables such as oromotor control, cognition, and linguistic factors affect speech development in the form of catalysts and constraints. Physiologic data are also being used to determine if non-speech oromotor behaviors play a role in the development of speech. This improved understanding of the physiology underlying speech, as well as the factors influencing its progression, helps inform our understanding of speech motor control in children with disordered speech and provide a framework for theory-driven therapeutic approaches to treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document