scholarly journals Apnoeic oxygenation in morbid obesity: a randomised controlled trial comparing facemask and high-flow nasal oxygen delivery

Author(s):  
John Schutzer-Weissmann ◽  
Thomas Wojcikiewicz ◽  
Anil Karmali ◽  
Asta Lukosiute ◽  
Ruoyi Sun ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e025442
Author(s):  
Lorenz Theiler ◽  
Fabian Schneeberg ◽  
Thomas Riedel ◽  
Heiko Kaiser ◽  
Thomas Riva ◽  
...  

IntroductionApnoeic oxygenation using nasal high-flow oxygen delivery systems with heated and humidified oxygen has recently gained popularity in the anaesthesia community. It has been shown to allow a prolonged apnoea time of up to 65 min as CO2increase was far slower compared with previously reported data from CO2increase during apnoea. A ventilatory exchange due to the high nasal oxygen flow was proposed explaining that phenomenon. However, recent studies in children did not show any difference in CO2clearance comparing high-flow with low-flow oxygen. To investigate this ventilatory exchange in adults, we plan this study comparing different oxygen flow rates and the increase of CO2during apnoea. We hypothesise that CO2clearance is non-inferior when applying low oxygen flow rates.Methods and analysisIn this single-centre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial, we randomly assign 100 patients planned for elective surgery to either control (oxygen 70 L/min, airway opened by laryngoscopy) or one of three intervention groups: oxygen 70, or 10, or 2 L/min, all with jaw thrust to secure airway patency. After anaesthesia induction and neuromuscular blockage, either one of the interventions or the control will be applied according to randomisation. Throughout the apnoea period, we will measure the increase of transcutaneous pCO2(tcpCO2) until any one of the following criteria is met: time=15 min, SpO2<92%, tcpCO2>10.67 kPa, art. pH <7.1, K+>6.0 mmol/L. Primary outcome is the mean tcpCO2increase in kPa/min.Ethics and disseminationAfter Cantonal Ethic Committee of Bern approval (ID 2018–00293, 22.03.2018), all study participants will provide written informed consent. Patients vulnerable towards hypoxia or hypercarbia are excluded. Study results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberThis study was registered onwww.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT03478774,Pre-results) and the Swiss Trial Registry KOFAM (SNCTP000002861).


The Lancet ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 389 (10072) ◽  
pp. 930-939 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Kepreotes ◽  
Bruce Whitehead ◽  
John Attia ◽  
Christopher Oldmeadow ◽  
Adam Collison ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e037964
Author(s):  
Shahan Waheed ◽  
Nazir Najeeb Kapadia ◽  
Muhammad Faisal Khan ◽  
Salima Mansoor Kerai ◽  
Ahmed Raheem ◽  
...  

IntroductionApnoeic oxygenation is a process of delivering continuous oxygen through nasal cannula during direct laryngoscopy. The oxygen that is delivered through these nasal cannulas is either low flow or high flow. Although the effectiveness of apnoeic oxygenation has been shown through systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials, a comparison of high-flow versus low-flow oxygen delivery has not been tested through a superiority study design. In this study we propose to assess the effectiveness of giving low-flow oxygen with head side elevation versus high-flow oxygen with head side elevation against the usual practice of care in which no oxygen is provided during direct laryngoscopy.Methods and analysisThis will be a three-arm study instituting a block randomisation technique with a sample size of 46 in each arm (see table 1). Due to the nature of the intervention, no blinding will be introduced. The primary outcomes will be lowest non-invasive oxygen saturation measurement during direct laryngoscopy and during the 2 min after the placement of the tube and the first pass success rate. The intervention constitutes head side elevation up to 30° for improving glottis visualisation together with low-flow or high-flow oxygen delivery through nasal cannula to increase safe apnoea time for participants undergoing endotracheal intubation. Primary analysis will be intention to treat.Ethics and disseminationThe study is approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Aga Khan University Hospital (2019-0726-2463). The project is an institution University Research Committee grant recipient 192 002ER-PK. The results of the study will be disseminated among participants, patient communities and healthcare professionals in the institution through seminars, presentations and emails. Further, the findings will be published in a highly accessed peer-reviewed medical journal and will be presented at both national and international conferences.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04242537).


2014 ◽  
Vol 99 (6) ◽  
pp. 511-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bueno Campana ◽  
J. Olivares Ortiz ◽  
C. Notario Munoz ◽  
M. Ruperez Lucas ◽  
A. Fernandez Rincon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document