Contralateral C7 transfer to lower trunk via the prespinal route in the repair of brachial plexus injury: An experimental study in rats

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 1282-1287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Wang ◽  
Ye Jiang ◽  
Jie Lao ◽  
Xin Zhao
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. e233788
Author(s):  
Tiam M Saffari ◽  
Christopher J Arendt ◽  
Robert J Spinner ◽  
Alexander Y Shin

We report a patient who has been on tacrolimus for bilateral lung transplantation and presented with a brachial plexus injury (BPI), with unusual improvement of lower trunk innervated hand function. The lower trunk injury with resultant left hand paralysis had developed after his sternotomy 18 months ago. He has been treated with tacrolimus as part of his immunosuppression protocol since the surgery, without severe side effects. Physical examination at 18 months demonstrated unusual excellent grip pattern and full opposition of his thumb with slight claw deformity of his ulnar two digits. While the neurotoxic effects of tacrolimus are more emphasised, the neuroregenerative properties have been recently explored. The recovery in this patient is unique and unusual after BPI and is most likely as a result of the low dose tacrolimus treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Khrisna Adi Pinardi Fundhi

Brachial Plexus Injury (BPI) results in decreased motor function in upper extremity and leads to reduced hand grasping movement. Orthotic prehension is designed to create artificial grasp movements in paralyzed hand. This study was to compare grasp kinematic improvement between body powered and myoelectric prehension orthosis usage in patients with BPI. This study was a single group without control and post test with experimental study. The subjects of the study (n = 11) were brachial plexus injury patients with non-functional hand strength. Joint motion and angular velocity of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of index finger were evaluated. There was an improvement in joint motion and angular velocity after both orthosis usage. Joint motion in MCP and PIP, Angular velocity in MCP were not significantly different between myoelectric and body powered and myoelectric prehension orthosis usage. PIP angular velocity improvement were better after body powered prehension orthosis usage (p= 0.03).In conclusion, body powered and myolectric prehension orthosis usage improved kinematic parameter of index finger’s MCP and PIP joint. PIP angular velocity was better after body powered prehension orthosis usage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document