scholarly journals On the Relationship of Tissue Surface Tension to Microscopic Parameters

2010 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 367a
Author(s):  
Eva-Maria Schoetz ◽  
M. Lisa Manning
Development ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 144 (10) ◽  
pp. 1798-1806 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. F. Gabriel Krens ◽  
Jim H. Veldhuis ◽  
Vanessa Barone ◽  
Daniel Čapek ◽  
Jean-Léon Maître ◽  
...  

HFSP Journal ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas Mgharbel ◽  
Hélène Delanoë‐Ayari ◽  
Jean‐Paul Rieu

HFSP Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva‐Maria Schötz ◽  
Rebecca D. Burdine ◽  
Frank Jülicher ◽  
Malcolm S. Steinberg ◽  
Carl‐Philipp Heisenberg ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 57-60
Author(s):  
Elias Stamboliadis

AbstractThe relationship of the energy required to break a particle or a particulate material vs. particle size has been studied by many researchers. On the one hand, mineral processing engineers, who are interested in the specific energy (in joules per cubic meter or joules per kilogram) required for grinding, almost agree that it is inversely proportional to the particle size, although they might disagree on the type of the relationship. On the other hand, building and structural engineers, who are mainly interested in the strength of materials (in newtons per square meter or pascals), they almost agree that at the size range of the elements used, their strength depends on the quality of the material rather than its size. The present article shows that both groups of engineers are right about the size range of the bodies used by each one. However, there is a critical size that determines the fracture behavior of a brittle material. The definition of the critical size can be used to understand the practical results obtained as well as to measure the surface tension of the tested materials.


2010 ◽  
Vol 107 (28) ◽  
pp. 12517-12522 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lisa Manning ◽  
Ramsey A. Foty ◽  
Malcolm S. Steinberg ◽  
Eva-Maria Schoetz

Author(s):  
Mauricio De Carvalho Ramos

In this paper I will compare two conceptions of basic elements or units of living organisms from the second half of the nineteenth century: Goodsir’s cellular centers and Bütschli’s protoplam. The comparison will be made from the proposition of a nucleoplasmic form, and the referred conceptions are historical expressions of this general form. The nutrition center is a form that combines the functions of nutrition, germination and reproduction, responsible for the production of tissues (textures), organs, tumors and the whole organism from the fertilized egg. Microscopic foams produce organic differentiation through dynamic stabilization of the surface tension between the alveoli. I will conclude critically by discussing the relationship of these two expressions in terms of their continuity or exhaustion as scientific achievements of the biology of the period cited.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document