scholarly journals Opposite Charge Movements Within the Photoactive Site Modulate Two-Step Channel Closing in GtACR1

2019 ◽  
Vol 117 (10) ◽  
pp. 2034-2040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oleg A. Sineshchekov ◽  
Elena G. Govorunova ◽  
Hai Li ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
John L. Spudich
1994 ◽  
Vol 269 (33) ◽  
pp. 21016-21020
Author(s):  
M. Panayotova-Heiermann ◽  
D.D. Loo ◽  
M.P. Lostao ◽  
E.M. Wright

1994 ◽  
Vol 269 (34) ◽  
pp. 21620-21626
Author(s):  
B. Schwappach ◽  
W. Stürmer ◽  
H.J. Apell ◽  
S.J. Karlish
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (26) ◽  
pp. 7160-7165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver J. Harrison ◽  
Julia Brasch ◽  
Gorka Lasso ◽  
Phinikoula S. Katsamba ◽  
Goran Ahlsen ◽  
...  

Desmosomes are intercellular adhesive junctions that impart strength to vertebrate tissues. Their dense, ordered intercellular attachments are formed by desmogleins (Dsgs) and desmocollins (Dscs), but the nature of trans-cellular interactions between these specialized cadherins is unclear. Here, using solution biophysics and coated-bead aggregation experiments, we demonstrate family-wise heterophilic specificity: All Dsgs form adhesive dimers with all Dscs, with affinities characteristic of each Dsg:Dsc pair. Crystal structures of ectodomains from Dsg2 and Dsg3 and from Dsc1 and Dsc2 show binding through a strand-swap mechanism similar to that of homophilic classical cadherins. However, conserved charged amino acids inhibit Dsg:Dsg and Dsc:Dsc interactions by same-charge repulsion and promote heterophilic Dsg:Dsc interactions through opposite-charge attraction. These findings show that Dsg:Dsc heterodimers represent the fundamental adhesive unit of desmosomes and provide a structural framework for understanding desmosome assembly.


ChemInform ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (19) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
Igor Shevchenko ◽  
Vasyl Andrushko ◽  
Enno Lork ◽  
Gerd-Volker Roeschenthaler

1995 ◽  
Vol 270 (45) ◽  
pp. 27099-27105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Panayotova-Heiermann ◽  
Donald D. F. Loo ◽  
Ernest M. Wright

1991 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
C S Hui

Charge movements were measured in frog intact fibers with the three-microelectrode technique and in cut fibers with the double Vaseline gap technique. At 13-14 degrees C, the ON segments of charge movement records from both preparations showed an early I beta component and a late I gamma hump component. When an intact fiber was cooled to 4-7 degrees C, the time-to-peak of I gamma (tp,gamma) was prolonged, but I gamma still appeared as a hump. Q-V plots from intact fibers at 4-7 degrees C were fitted with a sum of two Boltzmann distribution functions (method 1). The more steeply voltage-dependent component, identified with Q gamma, accounted for 32.1% (SEM 2.2%) of the total charge. This fraction was larger than the 22.6% (SEM 1.5%) obtained by separating the ON currents with a sum of two kinetic functions (method 2). The total charge in cut fibers stretched to a sarcomere length of 3.5 microns at 13-14 degrees C was separated into Q beta and Q gamma by methods 1 and 2. The fraction of Q gamma in the total charge was 51.3% (SEM 1.7%) and 53.7% (SEM 1.8%), respectively, suggesting that cut fibers have a larger proportion of Q gamma:Q beta than intact fibers. When cut fibers were stretched to a sarcomere length of 4 microns, the proportion of Q gamma:Q beta was unchanged. Between 4 and 13 degrees C, the Q10 of l/tp,gamma in intact fibers was 2.33 (SEM 0.33) and that of 1/tau beta was less than 1.44 (SEM 0.04), implying that the kinetics of I gamma has a steeper temperature dependence than the kinetics of I beta. When cut fibers were cooled from 14 to 6 degrees C, I gamma in the ON segment generally became too broad to be manifested as a hump. In a cut fiber in which I gamma was manifested as a hump, the Q10 of l/tp,gamma was 2.08 and that of l/tau beta was less than 1.47. Separating the Q-V plots from cut fibers at different temperatures by method 1 showed that the proportion of Q gamma:Q beta was unaffected by temperature change. The appearance of I gamma humps at low temperatures in intact fibers but generally not in cut fibers suggests an intrinsic difference between the two fiber preparations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document