Is surgical excision necessary in benign papillary lesions initially diagnosed at core biopsy?

44 Background: Papillary lesions of the breast are frequently diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB). The ability to distinguish benign from atypical/malignant papillary lesions is limited by the representative nature of the biopsy method; thus follow-up excision is usually recommended. We aimed to determine if larger CNB samples can more reliably predict the true benign nature of a papillary lesion, thereby sparing certain patients a formal surgical excision. Methods: We reviewed medical records of 53 female patients diagnosed with histologically benign papillary lesions on CNB from 2000 to 2010, who subsequently underwent surgical excision. Pathology slides of the CNB were reviewed to document the benign histologic features of the papilloma, the number of cores sampled and the area of tissue biopsied (mm2). Statistical analysis was performed to identify the characteristics of the CNB that were associated with retention of benign histology on excision. Results: Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and carcinoma were identified in 6% (3/53) and 8% (4/53) of papillary lesions, respectively, when excised. Clinical and radiographic characteristics did not distinguish the ADH/malignant lesions from benign papillomas. The CNB needle sizes ranged from 9- to 18-gauge (median 14). The number of cores sampled ranged from 3-16 (mean 4.5). Patients with benign excisions had a significantly larger area of tissue sampled by CNB than those found to have ADH/malignant lesions on excision (mean ± SD: 95.6 ± 101.2 vs. 41.7 ± 21.9, respectively, p=0.003). By logistic regression, CNB tissue samples consisting of ≥7 cores, or measuring >96 mm2 in aggregate, had a negative predictive value for ADH/malignancy of 100% (AUC of 0.69 and 0.68, respectively). Conclusions: Although no clinical or radiologic features distinguished benign from pathologically significant papillary lesions, larger sample sizes significantly improved the predictive value of benign histology on CNB. A papilloma sampled by ≥ 7 cores or > 96 mm2 showing benign histology at CNB, retained benign features upon excision. Close surveillance may be a reasonable option for patients whose benign papillomas are generously sampled at the time of CNB.

Download Full-text

A multivariate model to predict cancer upgrade from atypical ductal hyperplasia by core needle biopsy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2014.32.26_suppl.3 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽

pp. 3-3 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Alvaro Pena ◽

Robert T. Fazzio ◽

Sejal Shah ◽

Tanya L. Hoskin ◽

Rushin D Brahmbhatt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Needle Biopsy ◽

Core Biopsy ◽

Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia ◽

Individual Cell ◽

Surgical Excision ◽

Multivariate Model ◽

Low Risk ◽

Cell Necrosis ◽

Core Needle ◽

Ductal Hyperplasia

3 Background: Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is a high-risk breast lesion usually diagnosed with core needle biopsy. Although upgraded to cancer at surgical excision in ~15 to 25% of cases, routine excision is questioned due to cost and overtreatment. We evaluated clinical, imaging, and histologic features associated with cancer upgrade and developed a multivariate model to predict risk of upgrade. Methods: With IRB approval a single institution retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent surgical excision of ADH diagnosed by core biopsy from 06/2005 to 06/2013. Review was performed of electronic records, breast imagin,g and biopsy slides. Multiple imputations were used for missing data. Association of cancer upgrade with various features was assessed with logistic regression. Results: 409 biopsies with ADH on core biopsy, with later surgical excision, were included. The overall upgrade rate was (16.1%, 95% CI:12.9-20.0%); 10 patients had invasive cancer at excision and 56 DCIS only. Features on core biopsy most strongly associated with upgrade were imaging estimated percent of lesion removed (upgrade 9% for 90% removed, 14% for 50 to 75%, and 27% for < 50% removed), individual cell necrosis (upgrade 34% with necrosis vs. 9.5% without), and # foci of ADH (22% for >1 focus vs 8% for 1 focus). A multivariate predictive model (see Table) showed an average C-statistic of 0.77. Women with no necrosis and either 1 focus with ≥ 50% removal or >1 focus with 90% removal (36% of the sample) have low risk of upgrade (5.0%, 95% CI:1.3-8.7%). Conclusions: ADH on core biopsy with low risk of upgrade to cancer is defined by percent of imaging lesion removed, # of foci of ADH, and lack of individual cell necrosis. If findings are validated, women whose biopsies meet low-risk criteria might be considered for chemoprevention and surveillance rather than surgical excision.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text