Risk of second primary neoplasm and mortality in childhood cancer survivors based on a national registry database

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 127-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samah Hayek ◽  
Rita Dichtiar ◽  
Tamy Shohat ◽  
Barbara Silverman ◽  
Anneke Ifrah ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Kovalchik ◽  
Cécile M. Ronckers ◽  
Lene H.S. Veiga ◽  
Alice J. Sigurdson ◽  
Peter D. Inskip ◽  
...  

Purpose We developed three absolute risk models for second primary thyroid cancer to assist with long-term clinical monitoring of childhood cancer survivors. Patients and Methods We used data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) and two nested case-control studies (Nordic CCSS; Late Effects Study Group). Model M1 included self-reported risk factors, model M2 added basic radiation and chemotherapy treatment information abstracted from medical records, and model M3 refined M2 by incorporating reconstructed radiation absorbed dose to the thyroid. All models were validated in an independent cohort of French childhood cancer survivors. Results M1 included birth year, initial cancer type, age at diagnosis, sex, and past thyroid nodule diagnosis. M2 added radiation (yes/no), radiation to the neck (yes/no), and alkylating agent (yes/no). Past thyroid nodule was consistently the strongest risk factor (M1 relative risk [RR], 10.8; M2 RR, 6.8; M3 RR, 8.2). In the validation cohort, 20-year absolute risk predictions for second primary thyroid cancer ranged from 0.04% to 7.4% for M2. Expected events agreed well with observed events for each model, indicating good calibration. All models had good discriminatory ability (M1 area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC], 0.71; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.77; M2 AUC, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.86; M3 AUC, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.69 to 0.82). Conclusion We developed and validated three absolute risk models for second primary thyroid cancer. Model M2, with basic prior treatment information, could be useful for monitoring thyroid cancer risk in childhood cancer survivors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 7-7
Author(s):  
Renata Abrahão ◽  
Raul C. Ribeiro ◽  
Ann Brunson ◽  
Theresa H. M. Keegan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Waespe ◽  
Sven Strebel ◽  
Denis Marino ◽  
Veneranda Mattiello ◽  
Fanny Muet ◽  
...  

Research on germline genetic variants relies on a sufficient number of eligible participants which is difficult to achieve for rare diseases such as childhood cancer. With self-collection kits using saliva or buccal swabs, participants can contribute genetic samples conveniently from their home. We identified determinants of participation in DNA self-collection in this cross-sectional study. We invited 928 childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland with a median age of 26.5 years (interquartile range 18.8-36.5), of which 463 (50%) participated. Foreign nationality (odds ratio [OR] 0.5, 95%-confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.7), survivors aged 30-39 years at study versus other age groups (OR 0.5, CI 0.4-0.8), and those with a known cancer predisposition syndrome (OR 0.5, CI 0.3-1.0) participated less. Survivors with a second primary neoplasm (OR 1.9, CI 1.0-3.8) or those living in a French or Italian speaking region (OR 1.3, 1.0-1.8) tended to participate more. We showed that half of survivors participate in germline DNA self-sampling relying completely on mailing of sample kits. Foreign nationality, age 30-39 years, and cancer predisposition syndromes were associated with less participation. More targeted recruitment strategies may be advocated for these subgroups. To increase participation in DNA self-sampling, understanding and perceptions of survivors need to be better understood.


Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (20) ◽  
pp. 3623-3630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Austin L. Brown ◽  
Vidal M. Arroyo ◽  
Jennifer E. Agrusa ◽  
Michael E. Scheurer ◽  
M. Monica Gramatges ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Waespe ◽  
Sven Strebel ◽  
Denis Marino ◽  
Veneranda Mattiello ◽  
Fanny Muet ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Research on germline genetic variants relies on enough eligible participants which is difficult to achieve for rare diseases such as childhood cancer. With self-collection kits, participants can contribute genetic samples conveniently from their home. Demographic and clinical factors were identified previously that influenced participation in mailed self-collection. People with pre-existing heritable diagnoses might participate differently in germline DNA collection which might render sampling biased in this group. In this nationwide cross-sectional study, we analysed predictive factors of participation in DNA self-collection including heritable diagnoses. Methods We identified childhood cancer survivors from the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry for invitation to germline DNA self-sampling in September 2019. Participants received saliva sampling kits by postal mail at their home, were asked to fill them, sign an informed consent, and send them back by mail. Two reminders were sent to non-participants by mail. We compared demographic, clinical, and treatment information of participants with non-participants using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Results We invited 928 childhood cancer survivors in Switzerland with a median age of 26.5 years (interquartile range 19-37), of which 463 (50%) participated. After the initial send out of the sampling kit, 291 (63%) had participated, while reminder letters led to 172 additional participants (37%). Foreign nationality (odds ratio [OR] 0.5; 95%-confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.7), survivors aged 30-39 years at study versus other age groups (OR 0.5; CI 0.4-0.8), and survivors with a known cancer predisposition syndrome (OR 0.5; CI 0.3-1.0) were less likely to participate in germline DNA collection. Survivors with a second primary neoplasm (OR 1.9; CI 1.0-3.8) or those living in a French or Italian speaking region (OR 1.3; CI 1.0-1.8) tended to participate more. Conclusions We showed that half of childhood cancer survivors participated in germline DNA self-sampling relying completely on mailing of sample kits. Written reminders increased the response by about one third. More targeted recruitment strategies may be advocated for people of foreign nationality, aged 30-39 years, and those with cancer predisposition syndromes. Perceptions of genetic research and potential barriers to participation of survivors need to be better understood. Trial registration Biobank: https://directory.bbmri-eric.eu/#/collection/bbmri-eric:ID:CH_HopitauxUniversitairesGeneve:collection:CH_BaHOP Research project: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04702321.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document