Fibroblast heterogeneity in prostate carcinogenesis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sathyavathi ChallaSivaKanaka ◽  
Renee E. Vickman ◽  
Mamatha Kakarla ◽  
Simon W. Hayward ◽  
Omar E. Franco
2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 105-105
Author(s):  
Vasundara Venkateswaran ◽  
Haiyan Xu ◽  
Neil E. Fleshner ◽  
Linda Sugar ◽  
Laurence H. Klotz

10.2741/1625 ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 1355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suman, Kambhampati

Author(s):  
Mirazkar D. Pandareesh ◽  
Vivek Hamse Kameshwar ◽  
Kullaiah K. Byrappa

: Prostate cancer is a multifactorial disease that mainly occurs due to the accumulation of somatic, genetic and epigenetic changes, resulting in the inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes and activation of oncogenes. Mutations in genes, specifically those that control cell growth and division or the repair of damaged DNA, make the cells grow and divide uncontrollably to form a tumor. The risk of developing prostate cancer depends upon the gene that has undergone the mutation. Identifying such genetic risk factors for prostate cancer pose a challenge for the researchers. Besides genetic mutations, many epigenetic alterations including DNA methylation, histone modifications (methylation, acetylation, ubiquitylation, sumoylation, and phosphorylation) nucleosomal remodelling, and chromosomal looping, have been significantly contributed to the onset of prostate cancer as well as the prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment of prostate cancer. Chronic inflammation also plays a major role in the onset and progression of human cancer, via. modifications in the tumor microenvironment by initiating epithelial-mesenchymal transition and remodelling the extracellular matrix. In this article, the authors present a brief history of the mechanisms and potential links between the genetic aberrations, epigenetic changes, inflammation and inflammasomes that are known to contribute to the prognosis of prostate cancer. Furthermore, the authors examine and discuss clinical potential of prostate carcinogenesis in relation to epigenetics and inflammation for its diagnosis and treatment.


Burns ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajiv S. Raktoe ◽  
Marion H. Rietveld ◽  
Jacoba J. Out-Luiting ◽  
Marianna Kruithof-de Julio ◽  
Paul P.M. van Zuijlen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachana N. Pradhan ◽  
Akshay T. Krishnamurty ◽  
Anne L. Fletcher ◽  
Shannon J. Turley ◽  
Sören Müller

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Cheng Deng ◽  
Yong-Fei Hu ◽  
Ding-Heng Zhu ◽  
Qing Cheng ◽  
Jing-Jing Gu ◽  
...  

AbstractFibrotic skin disease represents a major global healthcare burden, characterized by fibroblast hyperproliferation and excessive accumulation of extracellular matrix. Fibroblasts are found to be heterogeneous in multiple fibrotic diseases, but fibroblast heterogeneity in fibrotic skin diseases is not well characterized. In this study, we explore fibroblast heterogeneity in keloid, a paradigm of fibrotic skin diseases, by using single-cell RNA-seq. Our results indicate that keloid fibroblasts can be divided into 4 subpopulations: secretory-papillary, secretory-reticular, mesenchymal and pro-inflammatory. Interestingly, the percentage of mesenchymal fibroblast subpopulation is significantly increased in keloid compared to normal scar. Functional studies indicate that mesenchymal fibroblasts are crucial for collagen overexpression in keloid. Increased mesenchymal fibroblast subpopulation is also found in another fibrotic skin disease, scleroderma, suggesting this is a broad mechanism for skin fibrosis. These findings will help us better understand skin fibrotic pathogenesis, and provide potential targets for fibrotic disease therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document