Normalization of Left Ventricular Systolic Function After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Minimizes ICD Therapy

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. S83
Author(s):  
Tracy Webster ◽  
Kelly L. Brooke ◽  
Ammar M. Killu ◽  
Paul A. Friedman ◽  
David O. Hodge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular Systolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Systolic Function ◽  
Icd Therapy

scholarly journals P797 Assessment of right ventricular systolic function with 3D echocardiography following cardiac resynchronization therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Jenei ◽  
E Papp ◽  
M Clemens ◽  
Z Csanadi
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
3D Echocardiography ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Ventricular Systolic Function ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background In approximately 30-40% of cases, the left ventricular systolic function does not improve following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT; non-responders). Currently, the role of right ventricular (RV) systolic function is not yet completely clear in the background. Our aim was to assess the RV systolic function with 3D echocardiography in CRT patients. Methods We selected 19 patients who received CRT in our department between May and June 2017, and whose 1-year follow-up data were available. We characterized several 2D parameters of RV systolic function, such as RV free wall strain (RV GLSFW), annular s’ wave velocity (TDI s), tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), RV fractional area change (RV FAC). A number of 3D parameters were also assessed, such as RV ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic (EDV) and end-systolic (ESV) volumes, using a dedicated RV analysis software. Moreover, we measured the LV EF and considered the patients "responder", when the LV EF improved with at least 10% after CRT implantation. Results From 19 patients, 12 was identified as responders (R) and 7 as non-responders (NR). No significant difference was seen in the mean age of patients in the two groups (NR: 68 ± 6 year; R: 67 ± 9 year, p = 0.76), however, the proportion of male individuals was higher in the NR group (8/12 vs. 1/7). The RV EF was higher in the R group (41 ± 8% vs.29 ± 10%; p = 0.012), while the EDV or ESV did not differ between the two groups. The RV GLSFW (–21.2 ± 7% vs.–13.9 ± 7%, p = 0.045) and the TAPSE (16.8 ± 5 mm vs.11.4 ± 3 mm, P = 0.03) values were significantly different between the two groups. Based on logistic regression analysis, the RV EF was an independent predictor of non-respondence. Conclusions The lower RV EF indicates non-respondence to CRT, however, it is not associated with RV dilation, i.e.adverse remodelling. These results suggest mechanical abnormality of RV function in the background of impaired EF.

Abstract 1604: Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Differs Between Patients With and Without Previous Right Ventricular Pacing

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea M Thelen ◽  
Christopher L Kaufman ◽  
Kevin V Burns ◽  
Daniel R Kaiser ◽  
Aaron S Kelly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Radial Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Doppler Imaging ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Peak Displacement

Background: Previous large studies on the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure have generally excluded patients previously paced from the right ventricle (RV). Previously RV paced patients (RVp) can exhibit an iatrogenic cause of dyssynchrony and reduced systolic function and thus, may respond differently to CRT than patients not previously RV paced (nRVp). The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that RVp patients have greater improvements in left ventricular systolic function, volumes, and dyssynchrony in response to CRT than nRVp. Methods: Standard echocardiograms with tissue Doppler imaging were performed before and after chronic CRT in RVp (n = 21, 16 male) and nRVp (n = 70, 54 male) heart failure patients. Ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular end diastolic (LVEDV) and systolic (LVESV) volumes were calculated using the biplane Simpson’s method. Longitudinal dyssynchrony was calculated as the standard deviation of time to peak displacement (TT-12) of 12 segments in the apical views. Using mid-ventricular short axis views and speckle-tracking methods, radial dyssynchrony (Rad dys ) was calculated as the maximal time difference between six myocardial segments for peak radial strain. Echo response was defined as ≥ 15% reduction in LVESV. Results are reported as mean ± SD. Results: Significant baseline differences (p < 0.05) were observed between groups (RVp vs. nRVp) for age (74 ± 13 vs. 67 ± 13 year), follow-up time (6.1 ± 1.8 vs. 4.6 ± 2.1 months), LVEDV (154.3±50.8 vs.185.3±56.9 mL), and a trend for LVESV (112.4 ± 40.6 vs. 134.9 ± 47 mL, p = 0 .05). No differences were observed for EF, etiology of heart failure, and dyssynchrony measures between groups at baseline. Echo response rate was significantly ( p < 0.05) greater in RVp (76%) than nRVp (57%). After adjusting for baseline differences, RVp had greater improvement in EF (14 ± 9 vs. 8 ± 7%, p < 0.05) and LVESV (−33 ± 18 vs. −20 ± 21%, p < 0.05). After adjustment for follow-up time, no difference was observed for change in dyssynchrony between groups. Conclusion: RVp patients upgraded to CRT exhibit greater improvements in systolic function and ventricular remodeling as compared to nRVp patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document