Clinical Significance of HER2-Positive and Triple-Negative Status in Small (≤ 1 cm) Node-Negative Breast Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 309-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elan Gorshein ◽  
Paula Klein ◽  
Susan K. Boolbol ◽  
Theresa Shao
2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (18) ◽  
pp. 2966-2973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Colleoni ◽  
Bernard F. Cole ◽  
Giuseppe Viale ◽  
Meredith M. Regan ◽  
Karen N. Price ◽  
...  

Purpose Retrospective studies suggest that primary breast cancers lacking estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and not overexpressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; triple-negative tumors) are particularly sensitive to DNA-damaging chemotherapy with alkylating agents. Patients and Methods Patients enrolled in International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials VIII and IX with node-negative, operable breast cancer and centrally assessed ER, PR, and HER2 were included (n = 2,257). The trials compared three or six courses of adjuvant classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) with or without endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone. We explored patterns of recurrence by treatment according to three immunohistochemically defined tumor subtypes: triple negative, HER2 positive and endocrine receptor absent, and endocrine receptor present. Results Patients with triple-negative tumors (303 patients; 13%) were significantly more likely to have tumors > 2 cm and grade 3 compared with those in the HER2-positive, endocrine receptor–absent, and endocrine receptor–present subtypes. No clear chemotherapy benefit was observed in endocrine receptor–present disease (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.11). A statistically significantly greater benefit for chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy was observed in triple-negative breast cancer (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.73; interaction P = .009 v endocrine receptor–present disease). The magnitude of the chemotherapy effect was lower in HER2-positive endocrine receptor–absent disease (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.29 to 1.17; interaction P = .24 v endocrine receptor–present disease). Conclusion The magnitude of benefit of CMF chemotherapy is largest in patients with triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer.


Gland Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 2255-2265
Author(s):  
Qiyun Shi ◽  
Ju Wang ◽  
Xiang Ai ◽  
Juncheng Xuhong ◽  
Dandan Ma ◽  
...  

Gland Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 166-174
Author(s):  
Zhiqiang Shi ◽  
Xueer Wang ◽  
Pengfei Qiu ◽  
Yanbing Liu ◽  
Tong Zhao ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12021-e12021
Author(s):  
Samip R. Master ◽  
Neelakanta Dadi ◽  
Chintan Shah ◽  
Gary Von Burton ◽  
Runhua Shi

e12021 Background: There is currently lack of adequate data to support for or against the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for small( < = 5mm) hormone negative and node negative breast cancer. We did a retrospective analysis from National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 positive/ Hormone receptor negative (HER+HR-) and triple negative breast cancer. Methods: Data was analyzed from approximately nine thousand women registered in the (NCDB) who were diagnosed with triple negative and HER+ HR-small ( < = 5mm) and node negative breast cancer between 2010 and 2014 and had follow-up to the end of 2015. The primary predictor variable was the receipt of chemotherapy, and outcome variable was overall survival. Additional variables addressed and adjusted included age, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index and grade of cancer. Results: Approximately 59% patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The five year overall survival in women with triple negative for breast cancer who received chemotherapy was 79% , compared to 87% , for those who did not receive chemotherapy(p < 0.00001). The five year overall survival in women with Her2+HR- for breast cancer who received chemotherapy was 68% , compared to 84% , for those who did not receive chemotherapy(p < 0.00001).In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for secondary predictor variables, avoidance of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with 59.5% reduction in risk of death. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that there are no role for adjuvant chemo in small breast cancers that are Her+ HR- and triple negative. The receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy lead to decrease in overall survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document