Asymmetrical loading during sit-to-stand movement in patients 1 year after total hip arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 ◽  
pp. 89-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Namika Miura ◽  
Keiichi Tagomori ◽  
Hisashi Ikutomo ◽  
Norikazu Nakagawa ◽  
Kensaku Masuhara
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (7) ◽  
pp. 529-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Namika Miura ◽  
Keiichi Tagomori ◽  
Hisashi Ikutomo ◽  
Norikazu Nakagawa ◽  
Kensaku Masuhara

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artaban Johnson Jeldi ◽  
Margaret Grant ◽  
David J. Allen ◽  
Angela H. Deakin ◽  
David A. McDonald ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (11) ◽  
pp. 2027-2033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumayeh B. Abujaber ◽  
Adam R. Marmon ◽  
Federico Pozzi ◽  
James J. Rubano ◽  
Joseph A. Zeni

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna-Clara Esbjörnsson ◽  
Josefine E. Naili

Abstract Background Methods to quantify and evaluate function are important for development of specific rehabilitation interventions. This study aimed to evaluate functional movement compensation in individuals with hip osteoarthritis performing the five times sit-to-stand test and change following total hip arthroplasty. To this end, trajectories of the body’s center of mass in the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior dimensions were quantified prior to and 1 year after total hip arthroplasty and compared to a healthy control group. Methods Twenty-eight individuals with hip osteoarthritis and 21 matched healthy controls were enrolled in this prospective study. Within 1 month prior to and 1 year after total hip arthroplasty, performance on the five times sit-to-stand test was evaluated using three-dimensional motion analysis and perceived pain using a visual analog scale. The center of mass trajectories for the medial-lateral and the anterior-posterior dimensions were identified, and the area under the curve was calculated, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVA were used to evaluate differences in the area under the curve, between pre- and postoperative performance, and between participants with hip osteoarthritis and controls. Results Preoperatively, individuals with hip osteoarthritis displayed a larger contralateral shift (p < 0.001) and forward displacement of the center of mass (p = 0.022) compared to controls. After surgery, deviations in both dimensions were reduced (medial-lateral p = 0.013; anterior-posterior p = 0.009). However, as compared to controls, the contralateral shift of the center of mass remained larger (p = 0.010), indicative of persistent asymmetric limb loading. Perceived pain was significantly reduced postoperatively (p < 0.001). Conclusions By quantifying the center of mass trajectory during five times sit-to-stand test performance, functional movement compensations could be detected and evaluated over time. Prior to total hip arthroplasty, individuals with hip osteoarthritis presented with an increased contralateral shift and forward displacement of the center of mass, representing a strategy to reduce pain by unloading the affected hip and reducing required hip and knee extension moments. After surgery, individuals with total hip arthroplasty displayed a persistent increased contralateral shift as compared to controls. This finding has implications for rehabilitation, where more focus must be directed towards normalizing loading of the limbs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 148-156
Author(s):  
Junsig Wang ◽  
Safeer F. Siddicky ◽  
Michael P. Dohm ◽  
C. Lowry Barnes ◽  
Erin M. Mannen

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 566-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuray Elibol ◽  
Bayram Unver ◽  
Vasfi Karatosun ◽  
Izge Gunal

Purpose: The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between self-reported and performance-based tests in the assessment of patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: Ninety four patients (35 males, 59 females) were included in the study with mean age 57.1 ± 14.6 years. Patients performed four performance tests (Timed “Up & Go” Test, Sit to Stand Test, Self-paced Walk Test and Stair Test) and two self-reported measurements (Harris Hip Score [HHS] and SF-36 [36-Item Short Form Health Survey]) were preferred to assess patients. Results: There were varying correlations between performance tests and subscales of the SF-36 including physical function, energy/fatigue, pain, general health. Strong correlation was found between HHS and Timed “Up and Go”( r = −0.59, p < 0.001), self-paced walk test ( r = −0.58, p < 0.001). Moderate correlation was found between HHS and sit to stand test ( r = −0.406, p < 0.001), stair test ( r = 0.32, p < 0.001). Conclusions: There were especially moderate-to-strong correlations between self-reported measurements and performance-based tests in the evaluation of patients with THA. Therefore, outcomes assessment after THA may include self-reported measurements or performance-based tests.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document