Depiction of branch vessels arising from intracranial aneurysm sacs: Time-of-flight MR angiography versus CT angiography

2014 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. 177-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masami Goto ◽  
Akira Kunimatsu ◽  
Masaaki Shojima ◽  
Harushi Mori ◽  
Osamu Abe ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 480-486
Author(s):  
Yan Song ◽  
Peng Qi ◽  
Juan Huang ◽  
Sheng Jiao ◽  
Jintao Zhang ◽  
...  

Background Intracranial aneurysm with endovascular treatment needs to be followed-up with a proper imaging method. Purpose To evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with zero echo time at 1.5-T in assessing the intracranial aneurysm remnant and in-stent lumen as compared with time-of-flight MRA, with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard. Material and Methods A total of 46 patients (17 men; mean age = 56.6±13.7 years) with 54 aneurysms who underwent coil embolization with or without stent were enrolled in this study. The presence of aneurysm remnant and the visualization of in-stent lumen were evaluated. The agreement of remnant identification between MRA with zero echo time and time-of-flight MRA with digital subtraction angiography was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa analysis. The performance of in-stent lumen visualization between MRA with zero echo time and time-of-flight MR angiography was compared with Chi-square test. Results Of 54 aneurysms, 27 were found to have remnants by digital subtraction angiography. The kappa value in identification of remnant of aneurysm was 0.852 between MRA with zero echo time and digital subtraction angiography and 0.741 between time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography. In detecting remnant of aneurysm, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 96.3%, 88.9%, 89.7%, and 96.0% for MRA with zero echo time and 91.7%, 83.3%, 81.5%, and 92.6% for time-of-flight MRA, respectively. In visualizing in-stent lumen, MRA with zero echo time had better performance than time-of-flight MRA ( P < 0.001). Conclusion MR angiography with zero echo time might be a better non-invasive approach in assessing remnant of aneurysms and in-stent lumen as compared with time-of-flight MRA.


VASA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Chen ◽  
Rongfeng Qi ◽  
Xiaoqing Cheng ◽  
Changsheng Zhou ◽  
Song Luo ◽  
...  

Background: To evaluate the value of time-of-flight MR angiography (TOF MRA) for the assessment of extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass in Moyamoya disease in comparison with computed tomography angiography (CTA). Patients and methods: A consecutive series of 23 patients with Moyamoya disease were analyzed retrospectively. Twenty three patients underwent 25 procedures of extracranial-intracranial bypass. Cranial CTA was performed within one week after the surgery to assess bypass patency. Then TOF MRA was scanned within 24 h after CTA on a 3T MRI system. Using 5-point scales (0 = poor to 4 = excellent), two radiologists rated the image quality and vessel integrity of bypass for three segments (extracranial, trepanation, intracranial). Results: Image quality was high in both CTA and TOF MRA (mean quality score 3.84 ± 0.37 and 3.8 ± 0.41), without statistical difference (p = 0.66). Mean scores of TOF MRA with respect to bypass visualization were higher than CTA in the intracranial segment (p = 0.026). No significant difference of bypass visualization regarding the extracranial and trepanation segments was found between TOF MRA and CTA (p = 0.66 and p = 0.34, respectively). For the trepanation segment, TOF MRA showed pseudo lesions in 2 of all 25 cases. Conclusions: 3T TOF MRA, a non-contrast technique not exposing the patients to radiation, proved to be at least equal to CTA for the assessment of EC-IC bypass, and even superior to CTA with respect to the intracranial segment. In addition, readers should be aware of a potential overestimation showing focal pseudo lesions of the bypass at the trepanation segment in TOF MRA.


2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimio Gotoh ◽  
Tomohisa Okada ◽  
Yukio Miki ◽  
Masato Ikedo ◽  
Ayako Ninomiya ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 195 (2) ◽  
pp. 445-449 ◽  
Author(s):  
D A Katz ◽  
M P Marks ◽  
S A Napel ◽  
P M Bracci ◽  
S L Roberts

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 697-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Woo Goo ◽  
In-Sook Park ◽  
Jae Kon Ko ◽  
Young Hwee Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document