Ultrasound-guided non-targeted liver core biopsy: comparison of the efficacy of two different core needle biopsy systems using an ex-vivo animal model and retrospective review of clinical experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 36-42
Author(s):  
Lisa M. Ho ◽  
Avani A. Pendse ◽  
James Ronald ◽  
Marcus Luciano ◽  
Daniele Marin ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1039-1054
Author(s):  
Alyaa Saad Bunyan ◽  
◽  
Sarah Saad Bonyan ◽  
Akeel Saad Bonyan ◽  
◽  
...  

Back ground: Breast microcalcifications are considered an early mammographic sign of breast cancer which are present with tiny bright spots of different morphology. In an ultrasound (US) image, the presence of microcalcifications within breast is an important indicator of malignancy.With an improved sonographic detection of microcalcification, ultrasound could be used for biopsy guidance for target sampling of tissue containing suspicious microcalcifications. If the biopsied lesions had a suspicious microcalcifications, specimen radiograph is mandatory to confirm the presence of microcalcifications in which a core containing any calcification on specimen radiography was defined as asuccessfully retrieved core. 14-G(Gauge) semi-automated core needle biopsy(CNB) device is less costly than other biopsy device. Methods:A prospective study was conducted on thirty female patients with thirty- two lesions their mean age was 48.53 years (age range, 21-75 years) radiologically classified as BIRADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data system) 4 (b, c) and5 from those referred to women imaging health unit in Radiology department for Sono- Mammography and those patients were referred from the inpatient wards and outpatient clinics of the surgery departments during the period from September 2018 till May 2019.All patients underwent conventional digital mammography and B-mode ultrasound examination and Ultrasound guided biopsy, specimen radiography then tissue samples were sent to histopathology department in which slide picture was done.Then (28) females done surgery and (2) patient still for follow up. Results: Radiological diagnosis of our lesions using BIRADS(Breast Imaging Reporting and Data system) categorical method were identified as two intermediate suspicious lesions (BIRADS 4B 6.3 %), twelve moderate suspicious lesions (BIRADS 4C 34.4 %), and 19 highly suggestive of malignancy lesions (BIRADS 5 59.4 %). Retrieval rate of calcifications according to specimen radiography were successfully retrieved in 30/32 lesions (93.8 %) and confirmed on specimen radiography .CNB( core needle biopsy) identified 28 lesions (87.5 %) malignant and four (12.5 %) benign lesions. Distribution of lesions according to pathological diagnosis in successful and fail retrieval group, the successful retrieval group comprised 26 malignant (22 IDC(Invasive ductal carcinoma), 2 DCIS(Ductal carcinoma Insitu), 2 ILC(Invasive Lobuler carcinoma) ) and four benign lesions.After CNB( core needle biopsy), 30 lesions underwent surgical excision and final pathology results were provided. All 24 IDC on 14-G semi-automated CNB (core needle biopsy) were confirmed to be IDC(Invasive ductal carcinoma) on final pathology. Of the two DCIS(Ductal carcinoma Insitu) on US(Ultrasound) guided CNB( core needle biopsy), one DCIS, were upgraded to IDC, the other one confirmed to be DCIS on final pathology,the two ILC were confirmed to be ILC on final pathology.Of the four benign lesions, the two ADH(Atypical Ductal hyperplasia) underwent surgical excision, finally diagnosed as DCIS,the other two benign lesions (fibroadenoma and fibroadenosis) their BIRADS assessments were category 4C and were recommended for follow-up.The overall accuracy of US-guided 14-G(Gauge) semi-automated CNB( core needle biopsy) was 90.0 % (27/32). Conclusion: The present study confirms the good retrieval rate (93.8%) of US-guided 14-G semi-automated CNB and diagnostic accuracy of (90.0%). Thus, this could be useful procedure for suspicious microcalcifications apparent on sonography.Specimen radiography proved to be a great help in deciding the accurate retrieval of microclcifications by core biopsy. It should be done in all cases of core biopsy for calcifications with marking of the core containing calcifications to be specially assessed by histopathology. We should try to do core biopsy before using VAB (Vaccum-Assisted Biobsy)for calcifications if well seen by ultrasound.


2017 ◽  
Vol 297 (2) ◽  
pp. 387-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina B. Walter ◽  
Andreas D. Hartkopf ◽  
Dorit Schoeller ◽  
Bernhard Kraemer ◽  
Felix Neis ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 909-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean D. Raj ◽  
Jordana Phillips ◽  
Tejas S. Mehta ◽  
Liza M. Quintana ◽  
Michael D. Fishman ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 488-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlie Zhang ◽  
Darrell R. Lewis ◽  
Paola Nasute ◽  
Malcolm Hayes ◽  
Linda J. Warren ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
Taher Abdullah Hawramy ◽  
Dara Ahmed Mohammed ◽  
Hasan Abdullah Ahmed

Breast cancer is the global health problem. It is the highest prevalent site-specific cancer in women throughout the world and the most common reason of death in middle age women,  following lung cancer. Up to 5% of breast cancers are caused by inheritance. Male breast cancer accounts for less than 1%. Mammography is the first imaging study to evaluate breast abnormalities, Ultrasound is particularly useful in young women with dense breasts. Core needle biopsy permits the analysis of breast tissue architecture and whether invasive cancer is present. To compare core needle biopsy and imaging, the accuracy of each modality for purpose of the diagnosis and their impact on preoperative planning before surgical treatment. A retrospective cohort study was performed in 70 cases of breast cancer during 2015-2017 at Slemani Breast Center/ Kurdistan region. Inclusion criteria any patient with diagnosed with breast cancer for whom core biopsy and imaging techniques (ultrasound and mammography) were done, Age 25 years and above. Exclusion criteria, a patient with breast mass who did not underwent: one of the two modalities, Age below 25 years, pregnant women. In the current study: mean age/year for the  participants were Mean age = 51.34 year ± 12.85 SD), Sixty-nine cases were female and one male. By core biopsy (97.1%) is positive for malignancy. In this study: results about 34.28% of BIRADS V (ultrasound)lesions proved to be positive for malignancy by core biopsy, 1.43% of BIRADS V were negative for malignancy and the association was statistically highly significant, for BIRADS III lesions 17.14% were proved as positive for malignancy by core biopsy. About 45.7% of BIRADS V (mammography were positive for malignancy by core biopsy and the associations were found to be statistically highly significant and for BIRADS III 12.85% of lesions were positive for malignancy by core biopsy. There was a statistically significant association between radiological investigation(ultrasound, mammography) and histopathological finding (core biopsy).  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document