P120 Asymmetric function of the right and left inferior parietal lobule in mind wandering – A tDCS and fMRI study

2017 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. e73-e74
Author(s):  
S. Kajimura ◽  
T. Kochiyama ◽  
R. Nakai ◽  
N. Abe ◽  
M. Nomura
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Coulborn ◽  
Howard Bowman ◽  
Chris Miall ◽  
Davinia Fernández-Espejo

Mind-wandering is associated with switching our attention to internally directed thoughts and is by definition an intrinsic, self-generated cognitive function. Interestingly, previous research showed that it may be possible to modulate its propensity externally, with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting different regions in the default mode and executive control networks. However, these studies used highly heterogeneous montages (targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL), or both concurrently), often showed contradicting results, and in many cases failed to replicate. Our study aimed to establish whether tDCS of the default mode network, via targeting the right IPL alone, could modulate mind-wandering propensity using a within-subjects double-blind, counterbalanced design. Participants completed a sustained attention to response task (SART) interspersed with thought-probes to capture their subjective reports of mind-wandering before and after receiving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS over the right IPL (with the reference over the left cheek). We found evidence for the lack of an effect of stimulation on subjective reports of mind-wandering (JZS-BF01 = 5.19), as well as on performance on the SART task (errors (JZS-BF01 = 6.79) and reaction time (JZS-BF01 = 5.94). Overall, we failed to replicate previous reports of successful modulations of mind-wandering propensity with tDCS over the IPL, instead providing evidence in support of the lack of an effect. This, and other recent unsuccessful replications call into question whether it is indeed possible to externally modulate spontaneous or self-generated cognitive processes.


Author(s):  
Sean Coulborn ◽  
Howard Bowman ◽  
R. Chris Miall ◽  
Davinia Fernández-Espejo

NeuroImage ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Hoenig ◽  
Frank Jessen ◽  
Dirk Granath ◽  
Nikolaus Freymann ◽  
Jürgen Reul ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
HanShin Jo ◽  
Chiu-Yueh Chen ◽  
Der-Yow Chen ◽  
Ming-Hung Weng ◽  
Chun-Chia Kung

Abstract One of the typical campus scenes is the social interaction between college couples, and the lesson couples must keep learning is to adapt to each other. This fMRI study investigated the shopping interactions of 30 college couples, one lying inside and the other outside the scanner, beholding the same item from two connected PCs, making preference ratings and subsequent buy/not-buy decisions. The behavioral results showed the clear modulation of significant others’ preferences onto one’s own decisions, and the contrast of the “shop-together vs. shop-alone”, and the “congruent (both liked or disliked the item, 68%) vs. incongruent (one liked but the other disliked, and vice versa)” together trials, both revealed bilateral temporal parietal junction (TPJ) among other reward-related regions, likely reflecting mentalizing during preference harmony. Moreover, when contrasting “own-high/other-low vs. own-low/other-high” incongruent trials, left anterior inferior parietal lobule (l-aIPL) was parametrically mapped, and the “yield (e.g., own-high/not-buy) vs. insist (e.g., own-low/not-buy)” modulation further revealed left lateral-IPL (l-lIPL), together with left TPJ forming a local social decision network that was further constrained by the mediation analysis among left TPJ–lIPL–aIPL. In sum, these results exemplify, via the two-person fMRI, the neural substrate of shopping interactions between couples.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e0155291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Royal ◽  
Dominique T. Vuvan ◽  
Benjamin Rich Zendel ◽  
Nicolas Robitaille ◽  
Marc Schönwiesner ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 610-610
Author(s):  
R. T. Oliver ◽  
E. J. Geiger ◽  
B. C. Lewandowski ◽  
S. L. Thompson-Schill

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
HanShin Jo ◽  
Chiu-Yueh Chen ◽  
Der-Yow Chen ◽  
Ming-Hung Weng ◽  
Chun-Chia Kung

AbstractOne of the typical campus scenes is the social interaction between college couples, and the lesson couples must keep learning is to adapt to each other. This fMRI study investigated the shopping interactions of 30 college couples, one lying inside and the other outside the scanner, beholding the same item from two connected PCs, making preference ratings and subsequent buy/not-buy decisions. The behavioral results showed the clear modulation of significant others’ preferences onto one’s own decisions, and the contrast of the “shop-together vs. shop-alone”, and the “congruent (both liked or disliked the item, 68%) vs. incongruent (one liked but the other disliked, and vice versa)” together trials, both revealed bilateral temporal parietal junction (TPJ) among other reward-related regions, likely reflecting mentalizing during preference harmony. Moreover, when contrasting “own-high/other-low vs. own-low/other-high” incongruent trials, left anterior inferior parietal lobule (l-aIPL) was parametrically mapped, and the “yield (e.g., own-high/not-buy) vs. insist (e.g., own-low/not-buy)” modulation further revealed left lateral-IPL (l-lIPL), together with left TPJ forming a local social decision network that was further constrained by the mediation analysis among left TPJ-lIPL-aIPL. In sum, these results exemplify, via the two-person fMRI, the neural substrate of shopping interactions between couples.


eNeuro ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. ENEURO.0310-17.2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Crottaz-Herbette ◽  
Eleonora Fornari ◽  
Isabel Tissieres ◽  
Stephanie Clarke

2018 ◽  
Vol 197 ◽  
pp. 593-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Przemysław Adamczyk ◽  
Miroslaw Wyczesany ◽  
Aleksandra Domagalik ◽  
Kamil Cepuch ◽  
Artur Daren ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document