Assessing Response to Treatment in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Role of Tumor Volume Evaluated By Computed Tomography

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedrich D. Knollmann ◽  
Rohan Kumthekar ◽  
David Fetzer ◽  
Mark A. Socinski
2022 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Corral de la Fuente ◽  
Maria Eugenia Olmedo Garcia ◽  
Ana Gomez Rueda ◽  
Yolanda Lage ◽  
Pilar Garrido

Kirsten Rat Sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is the most frequently altered oncogene in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). KRAS mutant tumors constitute a heterogeneous group of diseases, different from other oncogene-derived tumors in terms of biology and response to treatment, which hinders the development of effective drugs against KRAS. Therefore, for decades, despite enormous efforts invested in the development of drugs aimed at inhibiting KRAS or its signaling pathways, KRAS was considered to be undruggable. Recently, the discovery of a new pocket under the effector binding switch II region of KRAS G12C has allowed the development of direct KRAS inhibitors such as sotorasib, the first FDA-approved drug targeting KRAS G12C, or adagrasib, initiating a new exciting era. However, treatment with targeted KRAS G12C inhibitors also leads to resistance, and understanding the possible mechanisms of resistance and which drugs could be useful to overcome it is key. Among others, KRAS G12C (ON) tricomplex inhibitors and different combination therapy strategies are being analyzed in clinical trials. Another area of interest is the potential role of co-mutations in treatment selection, particularly immunotherapy. The best first-line strategy remains to be determined and, due to the heterogeneity of KRAS, is likely to be based on combination therapies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pankaj Kumar Garg ◽  
Saurabh Kumar Singh ◽  
Gaurav Prakash ◽  
Ashish Jakhetiya ◽  
Durgatosh Pandey

1984 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 1359-1365 ◽  
Author(s):  
C A Griffin ◽  
C Lu ◽  
E K Fishman ◽  
N Khouri ◽  
M Markman ◽  
...  

Despite the wide application of computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis and management of lung cancer, the role of this diagnostic modality in the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCC) has not yet been defined. We therefore compared information gained from routine chest radiography (CXR) and CT scans performed on 32 patients with SCC who were treated on an intensive chemotherapy-radiotherapy protocol. Seventy-nine pairs of CXRs and CT scans were retrospectively reviewed. We found that although CT delineates a greater extent of intrathoracic disease in each of nine anatomic areas evaluated than does CXR, agreement between CT and CXR was significant for all areas except the pericardium. Pericardial thickening was seen only on CT scan and is more frequent in SCC patients than has previously been appreciated, but both its etiology and prognostic significance are unclear at this time. CT also allowed interpretation of disease status in cases where radiation-induced fibrosis made interpretation of the CXR impossible. We do not recommend routine use of chest CT at time of diagnosis of SCC, but we recommend that its use be reserved for evaluation of new symptoms or suspected relapse, or when radiation fibrosis on CXR is severe.


2019 ◽  
Vol 195 (8) ◽  
pp. 734-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerio Nardone ◽  
Sara Nanni ◽  
Pierpaolo Pastina ◽  
Claudia Vinciguerra ◽  
Alfonso Cerase ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 210
Author(s):  
Sara Pellegrino ◽  
Rosa Fonti ◽  
Alessandro Pulcrano ◽  
Silvana Del Vecchio

Despite the recent advances in lung cancer biology, molecular pathology, and treatment, this malignancy remains the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common form found at diagnosis. Accurate staging of the disease is a fundamental prognostic factor that correctly predicts progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients. However, outcome of patients within each TNM staging group can change widely highlighting the need to identify additional prognostic biomarkers to better stratify patients on the basis of risk. 18F-FDG PET/CT plays an essential role in staging, evaluation of treatment response, and tumoral target delineation in NSCLC patients. Moreover, a number of studies showed the prognostic role of imaging parameters derived from PET images, such as metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). These parameters represent three-dimensional PET-based measurements providing information on both tumor volume and metabolic activity and previous studies reported their ability to predict OS and PFS of NSCLC patients. This review will primarily focus on the studies that showed the prognostic and predictive role of MTV and TLG in NSCLC patients, addressing also their potential utility in the new era of immunotherapy of NSCLC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document