The role of Exclusive Enteral Nutrition in the pre-operative optimisation of adult patients with Crohn’s disease. A Systematic Review

Author(s):  
Ayeshah Gordon-Dixon ◽  
Jessica Gore-Rodney ◽  
Rumneek Hampal ◽  
Rose Ross ◽  
Anur Miah ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S505-S508
Author(s):  
P Kakkadasam Ramaswamy ◽  
R Mutsekwa ◽  
X Lan ◽  
Y Chen ◽  
R Angus ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Exclusive Enteral nutrition (EEN) is not routinely used as induction therapy for adults with active Crohn’s disease (CD)due to limited adherence and palatability. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety of EEN in adult patients with CD. Methods Retrospective analysis of data from patients with active CD who underwent induction therapy with EEN at a single centre from January 2018 to July 2019. All patients who completed at least 4 weeks of polymeric EEN diet were included in the final analysis. Primary Endpoint (PE) was steroid-free clinical remission (CDAI ≤150) or response (100 point decrease in CDAI) at the end of therapy. Secondary endpoint (SE) was achievement of biochemical remission (CRP <5 mg/l or Calprotectin <150 μg/g) at 8–10 weeks. Results Sixty-three patients were initiated on EEN, 50 patients who completed at least 4 weeks of EEN were included in the final analysis. Mean age was 42.4 years, 25 (50%) were females. Mean CDAI score at baseline was 260. Forty per cent of patients were on concurrent biologics and 66.6% were on concurrent immunomodulators. At the completion of EEN, 72% (36/50) of patients achieved PE (29 remission, 7 response). SE was achieved in 65.7% (23/35) of patients. EEN duration ≥ 6 weeks was more likely to achieve PE (75% vs. 55.5%, OR 2.7, P 0.01) and SE (71% vs. 25%, OR 7.3, P 0.001).EEN duration < 6 weeks and current smoking were less likely to achieve PE and SE. Patients with concomitant steroid use at baseline had PE of 77.7% (vs. 68.8% with EEN alone; OR 0.9, P 0.5), and SE of 66.6% (vs. 60.9% with EEN alone, OR 0.77, P 0.74). Disease location, behaviour, sex, disease duration, concurrent biologic use or concurrent immunomodulator use did not affect the PE or SE. Six patients reported adverse effects (3 nausea,2 diarrhoea,1 constipation). Male sex, ileal location, B2/B3 phenotype were more likely to complete a 6 week EEN course. Conclusion Polymeric EEN is well-tolerated, safe and efficacious in inducing remission in adults with active CD. EEN duration of ≥ 6 weeks has better outcomes. EEN alone or in combination with steroids induces remission in adult patients with active CD. Further controlled trials using polymeric EEN are necessary.


Author(s):  
Sanchit Sharma ◽  
Arti Gupta ◽  
Saurabh Kedia ◽  
Samagra Agarwal ◽  
Namrata Singh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175628481988130
Author(s):  
Yihan Xu ◽  
Zhen Guo ◽  
Liangyu Huang ◽  
Jianfeng Gong ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
...  

Background: Isolated colonic Crohn’s disease (cCD) responds less well to induction therapy with exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) compared with ileal or ileocolonic disease in adult patients; therefore, we aimed to identify the factors that influence the response to EEN and develop a predictive nomogram model to optimize the use of EEN in cCD patients. Materials and methods: Eighty-five cCD patients treated with EEN as first-line therapy at our center between 1 June 2012 and 30 June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed as the primary cohort. The primary endpoint was clinical remission after EEN therapy. Potential predictive factors for the efficacy of EEN were assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses, and a nomogram to predict the response to EEN therapy in cCD patients was designed. Another 19 cCD patients were retrospectively included in the validation cohort to verify the accuracy of the nomogram model. Results: The clinical remission rates for the primary cohort and validation cohort were 52.9% and 47.4%, respectively. Pancolitis was the greatest contributor to the risk of failure to respond to EEN [odds ratio (OR) = 4.896; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.223–19.607; p = 0.025], lean body mass index (LBMI), colonic lesion features, simple endoscopic scores for Crohn’s disease, C-reactive protein before treatment and ∆prealbumin were also related to the efficacy of EEN in cCD. The nomogram model showed robust discrimination, with an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.906. Conclusion: Several predictive factors for response to EEN therapy in cCD adult patients were identified, and a promising nomogram that can predict the effect of EEN in cCD was developed.


Nutrients ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Gatti ◽  
Tiziana Galeazzi ◽  
Elisa Franceschini ◽  
Roberta Annibali ◽  
Veronica Albano ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000745
Author(s):  
Nikola Mitrev ◽  
Hin Huang ◽  
Barbara Hannah ◽  
Viraj Chandana Kariyawasam

BackgroundExclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is a potentially effective but underused therapy for Crohn’s disease (CD) in adults. It is first-line induction treatment for paediatric patients but remains a second-line or third-line therapy in adults.ObjectiveTo analyse the evidence for EEN in adult patients with CD, and summarise this in a narrative review.MethodsIn April/May 2020 and July 2021, a literature search was performed using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms: ‘Crohn’s disease’, ‘CD’, ‘inflammatory bowel disease’, ‘IBD’, ‘exclusive enteral nutrition’, ‘enteral nutrition’, ‘EEN’, in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane. Additional studies were obtained from references of search result articles as well as general reading. Studies with adult patients with CD treated with EEN were selected. 79 articles of relevance were found. Where data in adults were lacking, data from paediatric studies as extrapolated with care.ResultsEEN in adult patients been shown to improve clinical, biomarker, endoscopic and radiologic measures of disease activity. EEN avoids the potential adverse effects of recurrent corticosteroids for induction such as metabolic derangements and opportunistic infections. EEN has also demonstrated benefits among adult patients with fistulising and stricturing CD. It may avoid surgery in such patients. Preoperative EEN has also been shown to reduce postoperative complications and recurrence. There appears to be benefits in combing EEN with antitumour necrosis factor agents, however, benefits of combination therapy with other biologics are less clear. A major drawback of EEN therapy in adults has been poor compliance. More palatable polymeric formulations improved patient education and dietitian support may overcome this. Evidence in adults is limited to small studies, often with suboptimal control arms and lack of blinding. Larger scale studies with improved study design are needed to confirm these beneficial effects.ConclusionDespite limitations in evidence EEN should be considered in treating adults with CD.


JGH Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Day ◽  
Jessica Wood ◽  
Sarah Melton ◽  
Robert V Bryant

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evgen Benedik ◽  
Darja Urlep ◽  
Anija Orel ◽  
Rok Orel

Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) has proven to be a highly effective treatment option in inducing remission in active Crohn’s disease (CD) in the paediatric population. In adults with CD, the results of meta-analyses demonstrated that therapy with corticosteroids was more effective in comparison with EEN. The most important limitation of the success of EEN treatment is patients’ compliance. Exclusivity of enteral nutrition and its substantial impact on the quality of life are the main reasons why EEN is not acceptable to many patients. Therefore, the treatment with partial enteral nutrition (PEN), where patients are allowed to eat some ordinary food besides enteral formulas, is becoming an important treatment option, not only in inducing, but also in maintaining remission in CD. However, strong evidence on the efficacy of PEN for induction and maintenance of CD remission is still lacking. Due to the excellent safety profile of the treatment with enteral nutrition in comparison with other treatment modalities, further well-designed, randomised, controlled studies are necessary to elucidate the exact role of PEN in inducing and maintaining of remission in CD patients. Herein, the most relevant studies on the efficacy and the role of PEN in active and quiescent CD are reviewed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document