scholarly journals Anisotropic elastoplastic phase field fracture modeling of 3D printed materials

2021 ◽  
Vol 386 ◽  
pp. 114086
Author(s):  
Pengfei Li ◽  
Julien Yvonnet ◽  
Christelle Combescure ◽  
Hamid Makich ◽  
Mohammed Nouari
2020 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 103941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Russ ◽  
Viacheslav Slesarenko ◽  
Stephan Rudykh ◽  
Haim Waisman

2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Floor ◽  
Bas van Deursen ◽  
Erik Tempelman

2021 ◽  
pp. 106934
Author(s):  
Belal M.K. Alnajjar ◽  
André Buchau ◽  
Lars Baumgártner ◽  
Jens Anders
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A564
Author(s):  
M Alband ◽  
RM Lee ◽  
M Penny ◽  
S Brocchini ◽  
ST Hilton

2021 ◽  
pp. 2101749
Author(s):  
Simha Sridharan ◽  
Marcel B. J. Meinders ◽  
Leonard M. Sagis ◽  
Johannes H. Bitter ◽  
Constantinos V. Nikiforidis

2021 ◽  
Vol 384 ◽  
pp. 113951
Author(s):  
Keita Yoshioka ◽  
Mostafa Mollaali ◽  
Olaf Kolditz

Author(s):  
M.A. SEREZHKIN ◽  
D.O. KLIMYUK ◽  
A.I. PLOKHIKH

The article presents the study of the application of 3D printing technology for rapid tooling in sheet metal forming for custom or small–lot manufacturing. The main issue of the usage of 3D printing technology for die tooling was discovered. It is proposed to use the method of mathematical modelling to investigate how the printing parameters affect the compressive strength of FDM 3D–printed parts. Using expert research methods, the printing parameters most strongly affecting the strength of products were identified for further experiments. A method for testing the strength of 3D–printed materials has been developed and tested.


Author(s):  
Dika Handayani ◽  
Nicole Wagner ◽  
Victor Okhuysen ◽  
Michael Seitz ◽  
Kyle Garibaldi

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (s2) ◽  
pp. E65-E70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Hui Kang ◽  
Brett G. Compton ◽  
William T. Heller ◽  
Shuo Qian ◽  
Gregory S. Smith ◽  
...  

Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
pp. 4544
Author(s):  
Osman Konuray ◽  
Arnau Sola ◽  
Jordi Bonada ◽  
Agnieszka Tercjak ◽  
Albert Fabregat-Sanjuan ◽  
...  

Versatile acrylate–epoxy hybrid formulations are becoming widespread in photo/thermal dual-processing scenarios, especially in 3D printing applications. Usually, parts are printed in a stereolithography or digital light processing (DLP) 3D printer, after which a thermal treatment would bestow the final material with superior mechanical properties. We report the successful formulation of such a hybrid system, consisting of a commercial 3D printing acrylate resin modified by an epoxy–anhydride mixture. In the final polymeric network, we observed segregation of an epoxy-rich phase as nano-domains, similar to what was observed in a previous work. However, in the current work, we show the effectiveness of a coupling agent added to the formulation to mitigate this segregation for when such phase separation is undesired. The hybrid materials showed significant improvement of Young’s modulus over the neat acrylate. Once the flexible, partially-cured material was printed with a minimal number of layers, it could be molded into a complex form and thermally cured. Temporary shapes were readily programmable on this final material, with easy shape recovery under mild temperatures. Inspired by repairable 3D printed materials described recently, we manufactured a large object by printing its two halves, and then joined them covalently at the thermal cure stage with an apparently seamless union.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document