scholarly journals Input organization and plasticity of hypocretin neurons

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamas L. Horvath ◽  
Xiao-Bing Gao
Keyword(s):  
1970 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 711-725
Author(s):  
DEFOREST MELLON ◽  
DAVID J. PRIOR

1. Electrical records from ganglion cells in the central nervous system and from intact muscle groups controlling siphon retraction and shell-valve adduction have revealed qualitative similarities in the response characteristics of two neurone-effector systems following stimulation of tactile afferents. 2. Simultaneous electrical records from neurones and muscle indicate that Type I ganglion cells are motoneurones to the fast portion of the posterior adductor muscle. 3. The waveform and polarity of the post-synaptic responses of Type 1 cells depend critically upon the intensity of stimulation over intact sensory pathways. High-intensity input transiently excites the fast portion of the adductor; low-intensity input inhibits the adductor motoneurones. The input organization of Type I neurones therefore permits discrimination of stimulus magnitude and thus controls the characteristics of the response programme.


2006 ◽  
Vol 116 (12) ◽  
pp. 3229-3239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Abizaid ◽  
Zhong-Wu Liu ◽  
Zane B. Andrews ◽  
Marya Shanabrough ◽  
Erzsebet Borok ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 967-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. C. Rind ◽  
D. I. Bramwell

1. We describe a four-layered neural network (Fig. 1), based on the input organization of a collision signaling neuron in the visual system of the locust, the lobula giant movement detector (LGMD). The 250 photoreceptors ("P" units) in layer 1 are excited by any change in illumination, generated when an image edge passes over them. Layers 2 and 3 incorporate both excitatory and inhibitory interactions, and layer 4 consists of a single output element, equivalent to the locust LGMD. 2. The output element of the neural network, the "LGMD", responds directionally when challenged with approaching versus receding objects, preferring approaching objects (Figs. 2-4). The time course and shape of the "LGMD" response matches that of the LGMD (Fig. 4). Directionality is maintained with objects of various sizes and approach velocities. The network is tuned to direct approach (Fig. 5). The "LGMD" shows no directional selectivity for translatory motion at a constant velocity across the "eye", but its response increases with edge velocity (Figs. 6 and 9). 3. The critical image cues for a selective response to object approach by the "LGMD" are edges that change in extent or in velocity as they move (Fig. 7). Lateral inhibition is crucial to the selectivity of the "LGMD" and the selective response is abolished or else much reduced if lateral inhibition is taken out of the network (Fig. 7). We conclude that lateral inhibition in the neuronal network for the locust LGMD also underlies the experimentally observed critical image cues for its directional response. 4. Lateral inhibition shapes the velocity tuning of the network for objects moving in the X and Y directions without approaching the eye (see Fig. 1). As an edge moves over the eye at a constant velocity, a race occurs between the excitation that is caused by edge movement and which passes down the network and the inhibition that passes laterally. Excitation must win this race for units in layer 3 to reach threshold (Fig. 8). The faster the edge moves over the eye the more units in layer 3 reach threshold and pass excitation on to the "LGMD" (Fig. 9). 5. Lateral inhibition shapes the tuning of the network for objects moving in the Z direction, toward or away from the eye (see Fig. 1). As an object approaches the eye there is a buildup of excitation in the "LGMD" throughout the movement whereas the response to object recession is often brief, particularly for high velocities. During object motion, a critical race occurs between excitation passing down the network and inhibition directed laterally, excitation must win this race for the rapid buildup in excitation in the "LGMD" as seen in the final stages of object approach (Figs. 10-12). The buildup is eliminated if, during object approach, excitation cannot win this race (as happens when the spread of inhibition laterally takes < 1 ms Fig. 13, D and E). Taking all lateral inhibition away increases the "LGMD" response to object approach, but overall directional selectivity is reduced as there is also a lot of residual network excitation following object recession (Fig. 13B). 6. Directional selectivity for rapidly approaching objects is further enhanced at the level of the "LGMD" by the timing of a feed-forward, inhibitory loop onto the "LGMD", activated when a large number of receptor units are excited in a short time. The inhibitory loop is activated at the end of object approach, truncating the excitatory "LGMD" response after approach has ceased, but at the initiation of object recession (*Fig. 2, 3, and 13). Eliminating the feed-forward, inhibitory loop prolongs the "LGMD" response to both receding and approaching objects (Fig. 13F).


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (30) ◽  
pp. 9805-9811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Farrow ◽  
Juergen Haag ◽  
Alexander Borst
Keyword(s):  

1970 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford J. Drew ◽  
Reuben Altman

The free recall performance of college students was compared as a function of 2 degrees of external input organization and 2 levels of material associative strength. Ss recalled significantly more responses from organized than unorganized lists. S's performance was significantly influenced by difficulty of material. Material difficulty did not interact with degree of organization.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asier Aristieta ◽  
Massimo Barresi ◽  
Shiva A. Lindi ◽  
Gregory Barriere ◽  
Gilles Courtand ◽  
...  

AbstractBasal ganglia (BG) inhibit movement through two independent pathways, the indirect- and the hyperdirect-pathways. The globus pallidus (GP) has always been viewed as a simple relay within these two pathways, but its importance has changed drastically with the discovery of two functionally-distinct cell types, namely the prototypic and the arkypallidal neurons. Classic BG models suggest that all GP neurons receive GABAergic inputs from striato-pallidal indirect spiny projection neurons and glutamatergic inputs from subthalamic neurons. However, whether this synaptic connectivity scheme applies to both GP cell-types is currently unknown. Here, we optogenetically dissect the input organization of prototypic and arkypallidal neurons and further define the circuit mechanism underlying action inhibition in BG. Our results highlight that an increased activity of arkypallidal neurons is required to inhibit locomotion. Finally, this work supports the view that arkypallidal neurons are part of a novel disynaptic feedback loop that broadcast inhibitory control on movement execution.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document