scholarly journals Prospective assessment of rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus, a tool for improving access to care

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 459.e1-459.e6 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Chevaliez ◽  
L. Poiteau ◽  
I. Rosa ◽  
A. Soulier ◽  
F. Roudot-Thoraval ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e0210556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arati Mane ◽  
Jilian Sacks ◽  
Sadhya Sharma ◽  
Harpreet Singh ◽  
Alexandra Tejada-Strop ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing Chen ◽  
Zhong‐Hui Ma ◽  
Bing Xu ◽  
Hao Chang ◽  
Xiao‐Xia He ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 399-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Poiteau ◽  
A. Soulier ◽  
I. Rosa ◽  
F. Roudot-Thoraval ◽  
C. Hézode ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Beatrice N Vetter ◽  
Elena Ivanova Reipold ◽  
Stefano Ongarello ◽  
Rosemary Audu ◽  
Fehintola A Ige ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening is critical to HCV elimination efforts. Simplified diagnostics are required for low-resource settings and difficult-to-reach populations. This retrospective study assessed performance of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for detection of HCV antibodies. Methods Two lots of 13 RDTs were evaluated at 3 laboratories using archived plasma samples from 4 countries (Nigeria, Georgia, Cambodia, and Belgium). HCV status was determined using 3 reference tests according to a composite algorithm. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected populations. Operational characteristics were also assessed. Results In total, 1710 samples met inclusion criteria. In HIV-uninfected samples (n = 384), the majority of RDTs had sensitivity ≥98% in 1 or both lots and most RDTs had specificity ≥99%. In HIV-infected samples (n = 264), specificity remained high but sensitivity was markedly lower than in HIV-uninfected samples; only 1 RDT reached >95%. The majority of HIV-infected samples for which sensitivity was low did not have detectable HCV viral load/core antigen. Interreader variability, lot-to-lot variability, and rate of invalid runs were low for all RDTs (<2%). Conclusions HCV RDTs should be evaluated in the intended target population, as sensitivity can be impacted by population factors such as HIV status. Clinical Trials Registration NCT04033887


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphane Chevaliez ◽  
Françoise Roudot-Thoraval ◽  
Christophe Hézode ◽  
Jean-Michel Pawlotsky ◽  
Richard Njouom

Aim: HCV diagnosis will become the bottleneck in eliminating hepatitis C. Simple, accurate and cost-effective testing strategies are urgently needed to improve hepatitis C screening and diagnosis. Materials & methods: Performance of seven rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) have been assessed in a large series (n = 498) of serum or plasma specimens collected in France and in Cameroon. Results: Specificity varied from 96.1 to 100%. The clinical sensitivity, compared with immunoassays as the reference, was high for all seven RDT (97.2–100%). The Multisure HCV antibody assay and OraQuick HCV rapid antibody test reached sensitivity ≥99%. Conclusion: A number of RDT may be suitable for WHO prequalification and may be implemented in the framework of large-scale low-cost treatment programs to achieve the WHO viral hepatitis objectives by 2030.


1998 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 204
Author(s):  
S. Soviero ◽  
S. Barmat ◽  
L. Cheng ◽  
K. Hasselbring ◽  
M. Hinchey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document